ساشـ ْSASH

1400 years ago, God says….. listen to what He says. 👇🏻

@ahmedbassii شريف مصطفى

اعطوني اسم قارئ قرآن صوته يريحك نفسيًا ♥️ ولك أجر من يسمعه !

@GodlyAction x.com/eeora_/status/…

Wrong. In Quran 5:32, Allah is speaking to the Children of Israel, not to Muslims. Muslims are commanded to kill non-believers (Quran 9:5).

The Qur’an is full of verses of forgiveness that command kindness, forbid aggression, and instruct believers and Muslims to build and improve the earth and not to cause corruption in it. There are many such examples and many verses in the Qur’an. However, you like distortion and love and are devoted to lying, and without lying and distortion, Christianity would not have continued to exist.

1.John 8:58 – “Before Abraham was born, I am. The phrase “I am” means that he existed in God’s knowledge; it does not mean he is God. Even we existed in God’s knowledge before the creation of the heavens and the earth. 2.John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one.” The context here refers to the unity of purpose and mission, meaning Jesus works according to God’s will, not that his essence is divine. 3.John 14:9 – Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.” This means that Jesus reflects God’s teachings and attributes, like a mirror or messenger, and does not equal God in essence. 4.John 5:18 – He calls God his Father and makes himself equal with God. This text is taken from the Church’s interpretation, but the original language refers to “Son of God” metaphorically, meaning his special prophecy, not that he is God. 5. John 17:2 – You have given Him authority over all people This shows that the authority is given by God, meaning Jesus is dependent on God and not independent in divinity. 6. John 17:5 – Glorify me as You glorified me before the world.” The glory here refers to a distinguished status or message with God, not self-divinity. 7. John 20:28-29 – My Lord and my God!” Thomas’ exclamation is an expression of shock; many of us say “Oh my God” in a shocking event, and it is not a declaration of actual divinity for Jesus. 8. Revelation 1:17-18 – I am the First and the Last… I was dead, and now I am alive forevermore.” These are John’s nightmares and not directly from Jesus. 9.Revelation 22:13 – “I am the Alpha and the Omega. These are John’s nightmares due to insomnia and not from Jesus. As for Revelation 22:13: “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last,” this is just a vision and nightmare of John when he was sleep-deprived, and I am not obliged to accept it. You cannot compel me to accept your interpretation because the text itself is ambiguous and allows many interpretations. Therefore, I ask you for a clear and explicit text that allows only one interpretation, which you do not have. Not to mention that John is unknown, never met Jesus, and did not even know the details of his face. Now it’s my turn to provide clear and explicit texts that show that Jesus is a messenger and unites God، clear texts that do not allow any other interpretations, allegories, or quotes, nor nightmares. Do you still deny these texts? If you tell me it is symbolic or humility, I ask you for a clear and explicit text that cannot be interpreted otherwise, proving that you are correct in turning the words of monotheism into symbolism or humility. So far, there is no such text. The result: Jesus’ words in the Gospel directly affirm monotheism, and the other interpretations are intrusive and have no textual basis.

From yahoo AI’s assistant Scout: Jesus does not explicitly say "I am God" in the Bible, but he makes several claims that imply his divinity. Key Statements •In John 10:30, Jesus states, "I and the Father are one," which indicates a unity with God the Father
. •In John 14:9, he says, "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father," further asserting his divine nature
. Scriptural Evidence •Various passages throughout the Gospels affirm Jesus' divine attributes, such as his authority to forgive sins (Mark 2:5-7) and his eternal existence (John 8:58)

. •The New Testament letters also reinforce this belief, with verses like Colossians 2:9 stating, "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form" These statements and others collectively support the understanding of Jesus as God incarnate, even if he does not use the exact phrase.

Trump demands Iran “Open the F*ckin Strait, you crazy bastards”, warns Tuesday will be “Power Plant Day and Bridge Day” and that they will be “living in Hell”.

@markku60906522 @TheThornBird @PeteHegseth x.com/eeora_/status/…

@eeora_ @TheThornBird @PeteHegseth The doctrine of Islam and Islamic law were canonized centuries later. Hadith collections were fully organized and classified in terms of reliability mostly between 800 and 1000 AD in Sunni Islam at least, IIRC.

God is good.

Let’s be clear: If you worship a person named Jesus, then where is the explicit, direct text in which he clearly says: I am God? I don’t want ambiguous texts, nor symbolic ones, nor statements that allow ten different interpretations. I want only one sentence ،from Jesus himself or from a direct divine source ،that can be understood in only one meaning. And you know this well: A doctrine cannot be built on interpretations, nor on late explanations, nor on human conclusions. A doctrine is built on a decisive, explicit text that cannot be manipulated or interpreted in multiple ways. So take this clear principle: 1. Any divine doctrine requires a clear text that carries only one meaning. 2. If the text is vague or open to multiple interpretations, then it is a human doctrine, not a divine one. 3. If you rely on later interpretations to prove that Jesus is God, this is an admission that the original explicit text does not exist. So I ask you plainly: In which Gospel, in which conversation,did Jesus say:I am God, so worship me? If you don’t have this text, then you have no real foundation to worship Jesus as a god, and everything built after that is mere human interpretation and speculation ،not a divinely established doctrine ________ Even if, for the sake of argument, we concede that Jesus is God ،despite the impossibility of this and the absence of texts ،we will concede it just for the sake of argument 👇🏻 Do you not worship a God-man who used to defecate after having carried himself by himself in the womb of his mother when she was 14 years old? Then he died and screamed at himself while dying, hanging on the cross completely naked, begging himself to lift the burden he placed upon himself in order to give himself the ability to forgive humanity as the sacrificial lamb that he himself sent to die for humanity on behalf of himself,in glorification and worship of himself,to give himself closure for the horrible crime of Adam and Eve eating an apple This is why God sent himself to earth by impregnating his own creation with himself,preached for three years, then was killed. The God who ‘alone has immortality’ died at the hands of his own creations, then went on to forgive the ancestors of those creations because they ate an apple ،even though the descendants of Adam and Eve had just committed a worse sin than eating the apple: killing God ______________ Even if we hypothetically assume that Jesus is a god, despite the impossibility of that and the absence of any texts, and despite the contradictions of him coming to crucify himself and asking for help from himself, what you have in front of you is the most ridiculous doctrine humanity has ever known: the Trinity. The fundamental paradox here is this: you say that God is one, but at the same time you say He is three: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Meaning 1 + 1 + 1 = 1.This is a blatant logical contradiction.Mathematical and logical principles simply state: three separate things cannot be one thing at the same time. The flaw here is not interpretive but fundamental: if the three are different,then they are three; and if the one is itself, then it cannot be the three at the same time.The result: there is no rational way to turn three separate entities into one without violating all basic rules of logic Even Hinduism, despite worshipping the mouse and the dust, at least has an internal logical explanation for each god or force they worship, whereas the Trinity has no real logical explanation that unites the three in the one.This makes the doctrine impossible to understand rationally,and is often the reason it is considered one of the most ridiculous doctrines on earth from the perspective of reason and logic. And this is not to mention that the authors of the Gospels are unknown, and none of them ever met Jesus or even knew what he looked like! Not to mention the existence of additional texts in the Bible and others that were removed! Wake up

2 HOURS UNTIL THE BIG STREAM

Let’s be clear: If you worship a person named Jesus, then where is the explicit, direct text in which he clearly says: I am God? I don’t want ambiguous texts, nor symbolic ones, nor statements that allow ten different interpretations. I want only one sentence ،from Jesus himself or from a direct divine source ،that can be understood in only one meaning. And you know this well: A doctrine cannot be built on interpretations, nor on late explanations, nor on human conclusions. A doctrine is built on a decisive, explicit text that cannot be manipulated or interpreted in multiple ways. So take this clear principle: 1. Any divine doctrine requires a clear text that carries only one meaning. 2. If the text is vague or open to multiple interpretations, then it is a human doctrine, not a divine one. 3. If you rely on later interpretations to prove that Jesus is God, this is an admission that the original explicit text does not exist. So I ask you plainly: In which Gospel, in which conversation,did Jesus say:I am God, so worship me? If you don’t have this text, then you have no real foundation to worship Jesus as a god, and everything built after that is mere human interpretation and speculation ،not a divinely established doctrine ________ Even if, for the sake of argument, we concede that Jesus is God ،despite the impossibility of this and the absence of texts ،we will concede it just for the sake of argument 👇🏻 Do you not worship a God-man who used to defecate after having carried himself by himself in the womb of his mother when she was 14 years old? Then he died and screamed at himself while dying, hanging on the cross completely naked, begging himself to lift the burden he placed upon himself in order to give himself the ability to forgive humanity as the sacrificial lamb that he himself sent to die for humanity on behalf of himself,in glorification and worship of himself,to give himself closure for the horrible crime of Adam and Eve eating an apple This is why God sent himself to earth by impregnating his own creation with himself,preached for three years, then was killed. The God who ‘alone has immortality’ died at the hands of his own creations, then went on to forgive the ancestors of those creations because they ate an apple ،even though the descendants of Adam and Eve had just committed a worse sin than eating the apple: killing God ______________ Even if we hypothetically assume that Jesus is a god, despite the impossibility of that and the absence of any texts, and despite the contradictions of him coming to crucify himself and asking for help from himself, what you have in front of you is the most ridiculous doctrine humanity has ever known: the Trinity. The fundamental paradox here is this: you say that God is one, but at the same time you say He is three: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Meaning 1 + 1 + 1 = 1.This is a blatant logical contradiction.Mathematical and logical principles simply state: three separate things cannot be one thing at the same time. The flaw here is not interpretive but fundamental: if the three are different,then they are three; and if the one is itself, then it cannot be the three at the same time.The result: there is no rational way to turn three separate entities into one without violating all basic rules of logic Even Hinduism, despite worshipping the mouse and the dust, at least has an internal logical explanation for each god or force they worship, whereas the Trinity has no real logical explanation that unites the three in the one.This makes the doctrine impossible to understand rationally,and is often the reason it is considered one of the most ridiculous doctrines on earth from the perspective of reason and logic. And this is not to mention that the authors of the Gospels are unknown, and none of them ever met Jesus or even knew what he looked like! Not to mention the existence of additional texts in the Bible and others that were removed! Wake up

🚨🇫🇷 Castello Lukeba, expected to leave RB Leipzig this summer with clubs on alert over potential move. The release clause worth €80m can be negotiated and the price can be lower. Leipzig are expected to consider bids as player wants new challenge, as @philipphinze24 reported.

@NMedarts914 @BleacherHaters @PeteHegseth hi is 14

@eeora_ @BleacherHaters @PeteHegseth What about Aisha?

@NMedarts914 @BleacherHaters @PeteHegseth x.com/eeora_/status/…

@eeora_ @BleacherHaters @PeteHegseth Aisha Abi Bakr? 6 year ols, mariage consumed at het 9th.

Who honors and loves Jesus more 👇🏻 Christian: Jesus died Muslim: Jesus did not die and was raised as an honor Christian: He was crucified and was let down Muslim: God saved him and did not let him down Christian: Jesus is cursed because he was crucified Muslim: Jesus is honored and is living in bliss now Christian: Jesus is God Muslim: Jesus is a prophet from the greatest prophets of Islam Christian: I worship the Trinity meaning 1+1+1=1 Muslim: I worship one God with absolute oneness

Happy Easter to all those celebrating in Minnesota and beyond! Wishing you a day filled with peace, joy, and love. 💙

Let’s be clear: If you worship a person named Jesus, then where is the explicit, direct text in which he clearly says: I am God? I don’t want ambiguous texts, nor symbolic ones, nor statements that allow ten different interpretations. I want only one sentence ،from Jesus himself or from a direct divine source ،that can be understood in only one meaning. And you know this well: A doctrine cannot be built on interpretations, nor on late explanations, nor on human conclusions. A doctrine is built on a decisive, explicit text that cannot be manipulated or interpreted in multiple ways. So take this clear principle: 1. Any divine doctrine requires a clear text that carries only one meaning. 2. If the text is vague or open to multiple interpretations, then it is a human doctrine, not a divine one. 3. If you rely on later interpretations to prove that Jesus is God, this is an admission that the original explicit text does not exist. So I ask you plainly: In which Gospel, in which conversation,did Jesus say:I am God, so worship me? If you don’t have this text, then you have no real foundation to worship Jesus as a god, and everything built after that is mere human interpretation and speculation ،not a divinely established doctrine ________ Even if, for the sake of argument, we concede that Jesus is God ،despite the impossibility of this and the absence of texts ،we will concede it just for the sake of argument 👇🏻 Do you not worship a God-man who used to defecate after having carried himself by himself in the womb of his mother when she was 14 years old? Then he died and screamed at himself while dying, hanging on the cross completely naked, begging himself to lift the burden he placed upon himself in order to give himself the ability to forgive humanity as the sacrificial lamb that he himself sent to die for humanity on behalf of himself,in glorification and worship of himself,to give himself closure for the horrible crime of Adam and Eve eating an apple This is why God sent himself to earth by impregnating his own creation with himself,preached for three years, then was killed. The God who ‘alone has immortality’ died at the hands of his own creations, then went on to forgive the ancestors of those creations because they ate an apple ،even though the descendants of Adam and Eve had just committed a worse sin than eating the apple: killing God ______________ Even if we hypothetically assume that Jesus is a god, despite the impossibility of that and the absence of any texts, and despite the contradictions of him coming to crucify himself and asking for help from himself, what you have in front of you is the most ridiculous doctrine humanity has ever known: the Trinity. The fundamental paradox here is this: you say that God is one, but at the same time you say He is three: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Meaning 1 + 1 + 1 = 1.This is a blatant logical contradiction.Mathematical and logical principles simply state: three separate things cannot be one thing at the same time. The flaw here is not interpretive but fundamental: if the three are different,then they are three; and if the one is itself, then it cannot be the three at the same time.The result: there is no rational way to turn three separate entities into one without violating all basic rules of logic Even Hinduism, despite worshipping the mouse and the dust, at least has an internal logical explanation for each god or force they worship, whereas the Trinity has no real logical explanation that unites the three in the one.This makes the doctrine impossible to understand rationally,and is often the reason it is considered one of the most ridiculous doctrines on earth from the perspective of reason and logic. And this is not to mention that the authors of the Gospels are unknown, and none of them ever met Jesus or even knew what he looked like! Not to mention the existence of additional texts in the Bible and others that were removed! Wake up

Your statement is correct in that the human mind cannot fully comprehend God, but the mind must accept this from the messenger himself. Now, where did Jesus say that he is God, sharing the same essence with the Father and the Holy Spirit, and that we cannot grasp this because our human mind cannot? Where did Jesus say that? Where did you get this concept from? Who said this? If you can provide a clear and explicit text from Jesus, then I will accept you.

@eeora_ @PeteHegseth Have you not read. Why did he die and take our punishment. What was he trying to save us from. Answer is hell. The Father = GOD, the son = GOD, thinking your human mind can comprehend GOD in all his glory is pure hubris. Again, have you not read. Obviously not

Your statement is correct in that the human mind cannot fully comprehend God, but the mind must accept this from the messenger himself. Now, where did Jesus say that he is God, sharing the same essence with the Father and the Holy Spirit, and that we cannot grasp this because our human mind cannot? Where did Jesus say that? Where did you get this concept from? Who said this? If you can provide a clear and explicit text from Jesus, then I will accept you.

@BleacherHaters @PeteHegseth You say he is the prophet of children. Then why did your god allow Isaac to marry a child?

@eeora_ @PeteHegseth Sorry, we’ll take Jesus’ word for it, and not people obligated to kill, convert or subjugate His followers. The pedoprophet didn’t even know the names of the Apostles.

The sacred texts, such as the Gospel, were not written by people who saw Jesus, peace be upon him, and they never met him during his lifetime. As for the Qur’an, it was compiled and transmitted by the companions of the Prophet ﷺ, who lived with him, accompanied him from the beginning of the message, shared with him in both ease and hardship, and strove and achieved victories with him. They witnessed all that was revealed to him, memorized the Qur’an, and then compiled and transmitted it to later generations. Therefore, it is not possible to equate a book written by unknown people who never met its subject with the Qur’an, which was transmitted and preserved by people who lived with the Prophet and witnessed the revelation.

@eeora_ @PeteHegseth Oy! The Koran contains no eyewitness accounts - it was compiled after the death of Mohammed from oral tradition. There are more written eyewitness account of the life and times of Jesus Christ than any major historical figure of antiquity.

@realBob_Johnson @PeteHegseth The Qur’an cannot be of human origin. The Qur’an saved me from the darkness of atheism to the openness of faith after I discovered through scientific evidence that its source is purely non-human.

@eeora_ @PeteHegseth Islam is completely made up. You can match the quran to what was going on in Mohammed's life. He just added to it when he needed to manipulate a situation.

@grok @PrinzwillD @FabrizioRomano So, was what he did wrong or not?

eeora_ He's claiming the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) raped women and children for pleasure, and questions why Allah chose such a man as prophet. This refers to historical reports of his marriages—like to Aisha (betrothed young, consummated at 9 per hadiths) and others from alliances or captives in 7th-century Arabia. It's a standard polemical attack that applies modern standards to ancient norms common across cultures then.

🚨🔵 Valentín Barco has said yes to Chelsea move, personal terms agreed ahead of potential summer transfer. Colo Barco wants #CFC and it’s all set on player side. Up to Chelsea if/when to proceed, in total control of the deal being at Strasbourg. 🇦🇷 🎥 youtu.be/3dJIobOrecQ