Sedna.icp ∞

3.4K posts

Sedna.icp ∞ banner
Sedna.icp ∞

Sedna.icp ∞

@icprevolution

in @dfinity We trust - check https://t.co/bnI1W1m7oJ

Infinite ocean Se unió Mayıs 2022
149 Siguiendo185 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
VOTE yes $ICP mission 70 As dom said. Its not only about having as many tokens as possible. 1 token montly can have another month higher value if the price is double, tripple or 10x Gains 🚀will bring more people = more hype = more value of your holdings. Adoption–>inflation
English
0
0
2
145
Zach ∞
Zach ∞@Zach898989·
A parasite feeds off it's host until the host dies. ICP needs a parasite cleanse. Vote Yes. 🧹🫧
English
5
4
20
546
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
@novahodler @itsmejeremy77 How will be called all the hodlers and 8y gang when icp hits 0.03$ or zero thanks to fail to adopt and high inflation?
GIF
English
0
0
0
33
Mo icp
Mo icp@novahodler·
I voted No on the current proposal. It needs to be revisited after good discussions with the community. $ICP
English
5
2
8
511
RVD ∞ 🌱
RVD ∞ 🌱@Crypto_RVD·
@ZeroFuxBJ @icprevolution @iPhelipeVR Yep - Adoption. It's the only thing long-term that will drive more #ICP interest and ultimately higher prices. And the "fight the evil whales" propaganda being spread by some Mission 70 supporters is some of the worst, low I.Q. bullshit I've ever seen in any crypto community. 🤦‍♂️
English
1
0
2
53
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
@itsmejeremy77 @ZeroFuxBJ @iPhelipeVR If you think you know better than whole dfinity. Then ok. I dont know. I just always believed them because i have no choice. For 5 years i dont see adoption, ofc markets were hard on alts. But they want to make a change and i am for it. Keep locking you who voted no until zero
English
1
0
0
20
itsmejeremy
itsmejeremy@itsmejeremy77·
@icprevolution @ZeroFuxBJ @iPhelipeVR I voted NO on the current proposal, YES on the previous. There is zero thought-out reasoning given mathematically considering markets and derivatives including what exchanges hold and buys and sells from large holders to explain why this will be beneficial, it's all just hope.
English
1
0
2
21
itsmejeremy
itsmejeremy@itsmejeremy77·
@icprevolution @ZeroFuxBJ @iPhelipeVR There better be benefits to locking for 8 years. This is not Bitcoin, it's a compute network. Completely different. And there are Bitcoin rewards for mining. Many neurons will flood market because of this in 2 years if passed.
English
2
0
0
26
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
@itsmejeremy77 @ZeroFuxBJ @iPhelipeVR Can longterm holders sell their rewards? I feel like long term holders have a lot of benefits. There are longterm hodlers of btc. Are they recieving something? No, just price going up. For longterm holders would be fair to be able to sell after the dissolve then.
English
1
0
0
24
itsmejeremy
itsmejeremy@itsmejeremy77·
@ZeroFuxBJ @icprevolution @iPhelipeVR Absolutely, cutting rewards favors short term traders and punishes long term stakers and early believers/backers of the network. It also definitely introduces many unseen risks with network security and short term mindset along with massive unlocks in just 2 years. Need Adoption.
English
1
0
3
68
codecustard
codecustard@0xcodecustard·
@icprevolution @OWHistory Tokenomics. Incentives. You burn money to start subnet... stake.... you earn it back. People call it AI chain but its not. Its multi purpose.
English
2
0
0
41
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
Also, is the waiting for the team to start winning a good approach? Or is it better to move on and start to be a fan of another club? :) After 5 years of not winning for example. WhAt do you think haha🤯🫣💀
English
0
0
1
17
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
IQ question $ICP Is football team Full of best trainers and players still the best while not winning the league or most of the matches? Asking for a friend If answer is no, why am i seeing so much winning posts about icp as we would be winning.
English
1
0
3
151
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
@Hikikomori_Arc @OWHistory How Does Tao works? How are more tokens being spread? What will happen if there will be maximum total of tokens. Is there a halving?
English
2
0
1
58
Sedna.icp ∞ retuiteado
Felipe.icp ∞
Felipe.icp ∞@iPhelipeVR·
As 8 Years Gang, I could simply defend the current reward structure. Higher inflation benefits long-lock conviction directly. But long-term strength is not built by protecting what benefits us individually when a structural weakness remains unresolved. ICP already proved something very few networks have achieved: the technology is not the weak side. Compute works. The architecture works. The infrastructure is real. What has remained sensitive is price perception. And whether we like it or not, markets still react first to charts before they understand architecture. Traders bring liquidity. Liquidity shapes visibility. Visibility accelerates adoption. That does not diminish technology. It means that even the strongest technology must eventually solve the part the market keeps discounting. Inflation has long been one of ICP’s visible pressure points. Mission 70 may give us the opportunity to confront that directly. Not by abandoning rewards, but by beginning the transition from inflation-financed security to demand-financed infrastructure. Because what ultimately burns ICP is not theory. It is compute. It is Caffeine growing. It is Cloud Engines becoming real. It is agents using ICP at scale. If that engine expands, burn begins to matter structurally. And if burn matters structurally, price formation changes. That is why, despite having all my neurons locked at 8 years non-dissolving, I voted yes. Because sometimes defending long-term value requires accepting change even when the current model benefits you. The graph is not everything. But without fixing the graph, adoption always arrives slower than it should. Mission 70 is delicate. But if execution succeeds, this may be remembered as the moment ICP began addressing its Achilles’ heel without touching its technological superiority. ∞ #WorldComputer #InternetComputer
Felipe.icp ∞@iPhelipeVR

Mission 70 is not simply about lowering inflation. It reflects a deeper transition: from a network where rewards sustain infrastructure to one where infrastructure is increasingly sustained by real compute demand. That changes the economic philosophy of ICP. Cloud Engines are central to that shift: 80% of revenues go to node providers. 20% burns ICP. Every new cloud engine therefore creates direct burn. This transforms node providers from passive reward recipients into commercial infrastructure actors. That is no longer theoretical. Caffeine is already generating real ICP burn. Compute demand is already observable. At the same time, Mission 70 attempts to reduce supply pressure without destroying historical conviction: 8-year neurons receive recognition through a +10% reward flag. The objective is clear: reduce voting rewards (~40%) reduce node rewards aggressively while preserving long-term alignment. But the true variable remains demand. If compute does not grow, burn cannot compensate. Mission 70 ultimately requires: • Caffeine to expand • Cloud Engines to become real infrastructure • Agents to build and operate on ICP Because reducing inflation alone is not enough. A new economic engine must emerge. Another important element is the future dissolution queue, conceptually similar to Ethereum’s validator queue: supply release management. That matters because it may reduce abrupt market shocks and improve confidence around future unlocks. Execution will decide whether Mission 70 becomes a tokenomic adjustment or the beginning of a new economic phase for ICP. In my case, all my neurons remain locked at 8 years, non-dissolving — and despite being directly affected by the proposed changes, I voted yes. Because I believe this paradigm shift can be positive for long-term price formation. ICP inflation has long remained one of the most sensitive variables for traders, and traders still provide much of the liquidity through which long-term valuation is discovered. In summary: Strategically: very intelligent. Politically: very delicate. Economically: if execution succeeds, Mission 70 may be remembered as the point where ICP began financing itself less through inflation and more through real economic gravity. ∞ #WorldComputer #InternetComputer

English
4
9
53
4.1K
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
The right words.
Felipe.icp ∞@iPhelipeVR

As 8 Years Gang, I could simply defend the current reward structure. Higher inflation benefits long-lock conviction directly. But long-term strength is not built by protecting what benefits us individually when a structural weakness remains unresolved. ICP already proved something very few networks have achieved: the technology is not the weak side. Compute works. The architecture works. The infrastructure is real. What has remained sensitive is price perception. And whether we like it or not, markets still react first to charts before they understand architecture. Traders bring liquidity. Liquidity shapes visibility. Visibility accelerates adoption. That does not diminish technology. It means that even the strongest technology must eventually solve the part the market keeps discounting. Inflation has long been one of ICP’s visible pressure points. Mission 70 may give us the opportunity to confront that directly. Not by abandoning rewards, but by beginning the transition from inflation-financed security to demand-financed infrastructure. Because what ultimately burns ICP is not theory. It is compute. It is Caffeine growing. It is Cloud Engines becoming real. It is agents using ICP at scale. If that engine expands, burn begins to matter structurally. And if burn matters structurally, price formation changes. That is why, despite having all my neurons locked at 8 years non-dissolving, I voted yes. Because sometimes defending long-term value requires accepting change even when the current model benefits you. The graph is not everything. But without fixing the graph, adoption always arrives slower than it should. Mission 70 is delicate. But if execution succeeds, this may be remembered as the moment ICP began addressing its Achilles’ heel without touching its technological superiority. ∞ #WorldComputer #InternetComputer

English
0
0
1
68
Sedna.icp ∞
Sedna.icp ∞@icprevolution·
@bighab247 @dfinity Also i believe there are MF as ICPhub Poland which is minting tokens while moved to other project and left ICP…
English
1
0
1
36
ℏGnome 🇺🇸 ∞
ℏGnome 🇺🇸 ∞@bighab247·
The difference for $ICP Mission 70? My understanding You got the whales voting no, because they want to keep control of their free minted tokens and unsustainable rewards? You have the yes votes. Understanding @dfinity concept for tokenomics? What do think the difference is
ℏGnome 🇺🇸 ∞ tweet media
English
13
1
33
1.9K