Tweet fijado
idode
9.7K posts
idode
@idode_k
always up to something. stuff i’ve built is in my highlights. prev: meta, intel.
everywhere Se unió Kasım 2011
586 Siguiendo899 Seguidores
Introducing NoLimit
It's a pair of underwear that prevents injuries and makes you 3x times stronger
We track muscle activation, fatigue, and movement all in real time. And use AI to predict an injury minutes before it occurs.
English
I built the most accurate TSA wait time tracker in the country. Most services are using outdated APIs or simply inaccurate ones. I aggregate data from multiple different sources to get you the most accurate estimate. Check it out!
English
i'm datz (@190k), the one behind velocity.
moved to silicon valley at 18. did a startup right after high school, raised millions, and failed.
silicon valley has always been my dream.
i think it's not silicon valley without legendary founding stories.
as a founder, that's what has always excited me the most.
but here's the problem:
English
@jakemclain_ yo! super cool product. i'm working on something similar w/ some musician friends. i see you're in sf. would love to link for a 20min coffee this week.
English
Update: Strava is letting Caiden stay live! (previously StravaChat)
After some back and forth with their team I was able to demonstrate that Caiden's use of AI was entirely in alignment with their API agreement terms.
Users can continue to dig into their data at caiden dot app
Matt Ambrogi@matt_ambrogi
Strava wants me to shut down my app because it uses AI to help athletes analyze their training data. Full story: I built StravaChat to help athletes understand their training. Ask it anything - "What's my average pace this month?" "Compare my last 6 months total milage" - it analyzes your data like a personal coach. Users love it. Nothing else like it exists. Imo they're weaponizing vague API terms against AI. Their API agreement states: "You may not use the Strava API Materials (including Strava Data), directly or indirectly, for any model training related to artificial intelligence, machine learning or similar applications." I purposefully architected it to comply with their API terms: - AI writes analysis code - Code runs in isolated sandbox - Only numerical results go back to model / user The AI is just a code generator. It has no ability to access or train on Strava data. Strava's position: If a human developer writes average(pace), that's fine. If AI writes the exact same code, that's banned. The code is identical. The data never touches AI. But one is prohibited? I think this is what's really happening here: Strava is scared of AI, so they're killing innovation with overly broad, yet misplaced, terms while they figure out their own AI strategy. Meanwhile, athletes lose access to tools that actually help them improve. Full response I sent them below. **side note I absolutely was violating the term regarding the name and will change that.
English