Georgi 💁🏻‍♀️

I’m not left, I’m not right…. I beg people to stop making assumptions on others! You are like brain dead sheep flocking together to feel comforted by a sense of belonging and acceptance. I don’t need that, I’m good alone! The attacks on people since the right wing split is vile! It’s not debating, it’s out right bullying! It’s like being back at school. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve been called a slag the past few days simply for having a different opinion. It doesn’t bother me, it secretly turns me on. 🤷🏻‍♀️ Right now you are classed as a leftie for having an opinion. The amount of people who assume I am a “leftie” is ridiculous! I mean, is it meant to be an insult? I see it as someone else with a different view to mine. 🤯 Saying “They all must go”, “Deport them all” MUST be questioned. This isn’t a dictatorship where the leader of the party says something and everyone has to agree. Nor should people be intimidated or humiliated for not agreeing. Who is all? To me, in MY opinion, illegal immigrants and foreign criminals should go. But beyond that is where I feel uncertain. If you start to force people out because of their religion or colour it becomes dangerous. Why? Because being hostile to innocent people will bite you on the ass. A range of ethnicities work within our NHS, they speak English, they work hard, they save lives, they care for our loved ones. If we start ejecting innocent people, we may lose people who are valuable to our country, who should be respected. Let’s be clear, those who say it would open up jobs for English folk, if ethnic groups walked, there isn’t English people ready to step in because university fees are too high! It goes beyond that and the problem actually starts at the bottom, our schools are understaffed and under trained. Some schools have teachers teaching subjects they aren’t even qualified in, some have SEN children in a mainstream school with no staff qualified to support them. Colleges don’t have enough places for every student. How are these children suppose to get grades to go to university?! British vs British Citizenship They are two different things, agreed, but BOTH are legally living in Britain. Those people should be left alone in my opinion. Stripping someone’s citizenship when they have been settled for years is hostile. If they commit crimes then for sure it should happen. Currently to claim asylum in the UK you have to be in the UK in person - that is a huge balls up. This is why small boats are flowing, there is no way of applying until you get here! Halal meat, no animal should suffer, I barely eat meat to be honest. Humane killing it has to be. Voting in the UK - only British and British citizens in my personal opinion. Transgender - decisions should not be made until a lot older and should not be encouraged. I personally also don’t agree with parents Christening their children, your faith and religion shouldn’t be decided for you. I have my own thoughts and opinions, I’m not a sheep, I will not follow to please others and I will express my opinion and ask questions when I want to. All you angry pricks sweating in mummy’s basement need to get a grip! We do not need a dictator, we do not need someone who makes one rule for one and then another rule for others! Hypocrisy! We do not need racism! We do not need someone who tries to block investigations against them but wants everyone else investigated. 😩 We need strong minded people who ask questions and are willing to stand up and disagree when they don’t agree! 💪🏻 If you made it to here you get a medal 🏆 Love Georgi 💁🏻‍♀️

@darrensutton1 @KnucklesNp26684 @RupertLowe10 Ok? And the UK is in Europe

@imtheproblem666 @KnucklesNp26684 @RupertLowe10

Six years on from lockdown. Restore Britain will quash all convictions for non-violent breaches of lockdown rules - nobody will have a criminal record for breaking insane laws that should never have been implemented. We will refund fines, and the state will apologise. A line will be drawn. Vast non-COVID medical harm directly caused by lockdown and fear messaging will be properly investigated. The truth will not be concealed any longer by an establishment complicit in the guilt. We will tell the truth. Life years lost will be how we measure lockdown's impact - demonstrating the horrific suffering that was inflicted on the young. Delayed diagnosis/missed treatment for cancer, heart attacks, everything. The impact on children's development will be fairly and independently analysed. The results will be presented, to show the damage that lockdown did to millions of children. For ZERO benefit. Targeted tax breaks will be introduced to industries still reeling from the impact. Those who lost their jobs because they refused to take the COVID vaccine will also be properly compensated for financial loss and reputational damage. A Restore Britain Government would apologise for vaccine mandates and passports. That was morally repugnant - it would be formally accepted by Parliament. Those who have lost their lives because of that will be recognised. The Vaccine Damage Payment scheme will be overhauled to actually deliver proper compensation to those affected today, and to the families of those who have lost loved ones. It should always have been an entirely free choice for adults - no persuasion, no blackmail, no mandates. None of it. I hated it. Those who implemented all of this will be investigated by a fully independent commission. If they have been found to falsely manipulate and twist the evidence to push a damaging pro-lockdown agenda, they will go to prison. If they were found to allow the injection of healthy young children with that vaccine, knowing the damage that would be caused? Prosecutions will follow. To the many decent Reform voters who hold the same concerns… If you want to campaign to put Nadhim Zahawi into Parliament, that is your choice. Stay in Reform. The man wanted to allow children to overrule their parents in order to take the COVID vaccine? Can you back him? Ask yourself that honestly. Restore Britain will fight to keep him out. Join us. Accountability is what we need. And that is what Restore Britain would deliver. A political party to finally fight for lockdown accountability. We won’t simply pretend none of it ever happened. We will ensure that it doesn’t happen again, and we will ensure that those who were responsible are held accountable.

@darrensutton1 @KnucklesNp26684 @RupertLowe10 Well actually….. I am 😝

@imtheproblem666 @KnucklesNp26684 @RupertLowe10 Neither are you!

@foundthelight22 @1StarImpact @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 @elonmusk You don’t act very British

@1StarImpact @imtheproblem666 @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 @elonmusk Spineless

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 GDP is growth of economy 😩 fiscal spending is what you use! “Bint”? I’m clearly brighter than you! I’m not here for your shitty insults so be gone! Dumbass!

@imtheproblem666 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 None of the the things ive mentioned are not costed into the GDP figure, you midwitted bint 🤣🤣 And using AI is pathetic 🙄

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 I suggest you go do your own research as you are chatting bollocks! The link is at the top of the screenshot if you can’t be arsed to look into it yourself! Seriously get your head out your ass and out of Rupies!

@imtheproblem666 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 Link the source so I can read all the data.

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 Look at that graph, it’s embarrassing….

@badgers_hate_me @imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 Housing costs. Schooling costs. NHS costs. Social services costs. Police costs. Interpretation costs. Benefits costs. Court costs. Prison costs. And then there are the societal costs. How much do you think the damage the muslim rape gangs do, cost the tax payer?

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10

@imtheproblem666 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 🤣🤣 Random screenshot = facts

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 Maybe do your research bub

@GingerWitchy78 @badgers_hate_me @RupertLowe10 How do we know the lower burden aren’t family members of the high skilled? The burden is so low anyway

@badgers_hate_me @imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 No. The stats don't say that. The tiny % high earning migrants cover the vast majority of burden migrants. So we deport the detritus burden migrants and keep the high earners Win win. We lose no tax revenue and save billions.

@GingerWitchy78 @RupertLowe10 Then legal fees will be massive 🙄 stop chatting bollocks! Things aren’t simple, face that and it will be easier and less disappointing. A lot of Rupies plans will take years!

@imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 We ignore the notice period and take the "diplomatic consequences" which won't happen becuase they can't do fuck all about it.

@foundthelight22 @1StarImpact @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 Explains a lot??? Because someone is against all rape?! Are you ok? 🤯

@1StarImpact @imtheproblem666 @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 Explains alot Whats your ethnicity

@KnucklesNp26684 @RupertLowe10 You aren’t even in the UK 😩😩😩

@imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 "planning to give money away" That was STOLEN by the state in the first place. I got fined thousands of quid. I want my fucking money back, bitches.

@JonBellHistory @RestoreBritain_ Jehovah witness

@imtheproblem666 @RestoreBritain_ Joho? 🤔

Restore Britain would end political Islam.

@RupertLowe10 It loaded like this….. I wish I hadn’t clicked it….. I feel like I’m in a time warp!!!

I am pleased to have Jacob Rees-Mogg’s support for my legal action against an administrative body related to Parliament - my argument is aimed at empowering elected MPs over unelected officials. On Tuesday 17 March my Barrister, Christopher Newman, and I were in the Administrative Court in London at a hearing in front of High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain. It is a significant case for the power of parliament, and therefore the power of the voters. As the MP for Great Yarmouth, I am seeking to challenge the legality of the processes of the ‘Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme’, also known as the ICGS - importantly, it is entirely legally separate from Parliament. The scheme’s genesis is driven by the ‘Me Too’ movement in 2018. The ICGS are seeking to use the doctrine of ‘Parliamentary Privilege’ to assert that they are, in effect, beyond the scrutiny of the law. Parliamentary privilege exists to allow MPs to do our job away from legal threats, it does not exist to protect bureaucratic bodies. As Jacob Rees-Mogg, former Leader of the House of Commons, points out in his analysis: “As the ICGS is independent, it cannot in its workings be a Commons body, as it would then not be independent. It is really very straightforward and Rupert Lowe seems to be right." This is arguably the most significant constitutional case in years with the ICGS now arguing the polar opposite of the position the state took in the case of R v Chaytor where MPs unsuccessfully tried to use Parliamentary Privilege to avoid prosecution for abuse of expense claims. ICGS staff are not legally qualified, and this administrative body is outside the orbit of the Chamber and has no link to MPs. It has not reported to a Parliamentary Committee of MPs since 2020 when all links were severed and a panel was inserted. It is our argument that this body cannot claim to be above the law - it is not right that a bureaucratic body separate from Parliament is attempting to use parliamentary privilege, designed for elected politicians, to avoid reasonable scrutiny. Rees-Mogg ends his article: “Thus if Lowe wins, he will not have harmed Parliament, but defended it. For through cowardice we – and I was an MP at the time – abdicated our privileged responsibility and gave it to unelected boffins, who are not so much better than elected politicians after all, but much harder to eject.” We expect a Judgment after Easter, around 14 April 2026. For anyone interested, please find below links to the relevant Court documents and media coverage: Our skeleton argument. #wTfvSth2a99a" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">drive.proton.me/urls/C66EX752H… Jacobs Rees-Mogg article published - ‘Rupert Lowe and Parliamentary Privilege’. letters.jacobreesmogg.com/p/rupert-lowe-…

@GingerWitchy78 @RupertLowe10 There is a formal process!

@imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 We don need to retrieve how its defined. We just withdraw from the treaty. No legislation needed. What will happen? Nothing.

@LexiBeaChorlton We do not want dictatorship!!!

Hey Everyone; I've visited fantasy land I met a man called Rupert Lowe He could wave a magic wand and just like that we travelled in time all the way back to the Victorian age, Britain was restored 🥱 It was still shit 🤣 very shit If you're a realist and an achiever you vote Reform 🩵

@GingerWitchy78 @RupertLowe10 This is just for aid, let alone about immigration

@imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 You can absolutely legally organise before you are elected. No laws need to be scrapped. Policies need to be scrapped. And thats easy. We dont need to do anything other than stop paying the aid and there is nothing anybody can do

@GingerWitchy78 @RupertLowe10 Are you kidding me?!

@foundthelight22 @1StarImpact @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 This just gets better and better lol 😂 you are hilarious! Go put your head down the toilet and be done with it, god will then forgive you for your sins if you beg and pray!

@imtheproblem666 @1StarImpact @TalutellenduUle @PiRaticus @RupertLowe10 Im not Christian yet

@GingerWitchy78 @RupertLowe10 No, that isn’t how it works, you can’t legally organise until you are in power, laws need to be scrapped / changed, long term aid agreements stripped (legal issues and costly) and you have to get it past the other members and will be held accountable by the opposition

@imtheproblem666 @RupertLowe10 He has a lot of time to organise.