Disc Order Space Toaster
16.8K posts
Disc Order Space Toaster
@jacuzzi_toaster
Luminary of the Phosphorescent Disc Order. Domeborne Field Theorist.
Under the firmament Se unió Mayıs 2012
309 Siguiendo199 Seguidores
"If sunsets are just the sun leaving our perspective on a flat plane...then how come it doesn't noticeably shrink down in size as it disappears over the horizon?"
Short answer: The water vapor in the atmosphere creates a magnification effect.
ATMOSPHERIC LENSING explained 👇
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman
The Law of Perspective Explained - Why boats, and the Sun appear to "disappear over a curve" TLDR: these distant objects are simply leaving our field of view on the great Earth plane. [🎥: Terry Eicher]
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman You know fuck-all, moron. You wouldn't recognize reality if it slapped your face with a shovel
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman The more water vapor in the air = the more refraction = the less visibility, moron. No refraction/minimal refraction = you can see the furthest. youtube.com/watch?v=q9rnfp…
YouTube
English
@Dugi144 @benwehrman Projecting your own ineptitude doesn’t change reality.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman You wouldn't recognize reality if it bit your nose off
English
@Dugi144 @benwehrman We know how atmospheric refraction works. And again it’s not a fresnel lens, the fresnel lens works in the opposite way that ducting works over bodies of water.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman The atmosphere over the oceans and in wet climates is filled with water vapour that causes refraction and magnification effect, moron. And fresnel lens thingie is the proof of concept..because water vapour filled atmosphere does to the light in principle the same thing
English
@THeMyerSHOW I love the double reply by the way. Lets me know I really hurt your poor retarded feelings 😂🤣🖕
English
@jacuzzi_toaster It’s ok the
Earth isn’t a sphere or flat it’s part of Ai’s Devine plan
English
probably one of the best accounts i follow, plus Ted is an all around good human
Ted Logan@TedLogan1010
Fun space “fact” of the day!! Venus is hotter than Mercury even though Mercury is 31 million miles closer to the Sun. Follow me for more ridiculous nonsense!
English
@THeMyerSHOW Isn’t it funny how a grown adult is throwing a tantrum over me calling out his boyfriend for being a grifting dumbass?
English
@jacuzzi_toaster Isn’t it funny you came all this way just to give somebody the emoji finger I’d stick your hand up your own ass and then let your wife suck my dick
English
@Dugi144 @benwehrman The atmosphere isn’t a fresnel lens, you gullible retard.
And your statement is simply your own nonsensical opinion lmfao
You have lost touch with reality.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman You really live in an upside-down cosmos, where everything is inverted, lol. And that's why the statement of fact is to you ad hominem. youtube.com/watch?v=q9rnfp…
YouTube
English
@THeMyerSHOW Your opinion of me means nothing. 😂🖕
But I am positive about life.
I am very negative when it comes to lying grifters that peddle dipshit lies.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster Awww why are you so positive about life, bet so many people hate you
English
@BrockRiddickIFB Sunlight is parallel.
Flatards refuse or just can’t understand perspective.
English
@DisculpemeCock @WoehlBill @GiovanniSagredo @AshtonForbes Nice non-sequitur fallacy, flat brained dumbass.
English
Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock
🚨GLOBETARD TURD ALERT 🚨 FLERFS WIN BY SOLVING BIGGEST PROBLEM IN PHYSICS: 1. What is the Standard Model? The Standard Model of Particle Physics is the best theory we currently have that describes all known fundamental particles and three of the four fundamental forces: • Particles: It includes quarks (which make up protons and neutrons), leptons (electrons, neutrinos, etc.), and force-carrying bosons (photon for electromagnetism, gluons for strong force, W and Z bosons for weak force, and the Higgs boson). • Forces: It successfully explains electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force with extreme precision. It is a quantum field theory — meaning it treats particles as excitations of underlying quantum fields and has been tested to incredible accuracy in particle accelerators like the LHC. Big missing piece: The Standard Model does not include gravity. 2. What is Quantum Gravity? Quantum Gravity is the hypothetical theory that would successfully combine General Relativity (Einstein’s theory of gravity as curvature of spacetime) with Quantum Mechanics (the rules that govern the very small, like particles and fields). The goal is to create a single framework that works at both cosmic scales (gravity) and subatomic scales (quantum behavior). Currently, when physicists try to quantize gravity using the same methods as the Standard Model, the math breaks down — it produces infinite, non-physical results (called “non-renormalizable divergences”). This is one of the biggest unsolved problems in physics. 3. Flat Earth Perspective: Why They Will Never Be Reconciled From the Flat Earth view, the reason the Standard Model cannot reconcile with gravity is very simple: Gravity doesn’t exist as a fundamental force. What we experience as “gravity” (objects falling down) is better explained as uniform downward acceleration of the entire flat plane (or density/buoyancy in a medium). There is no inverse-square “attractive force” pulling masses toward each other from a distance. Because gravity is not a real fundamental force in the way Einstein and Newton described it, trying to “quantize” it within the Standard Model is impossible — you’re trying to quantize something that isn’t there in the first place. The Standard Model works beautifully for the other three forces because those forces actually exist as quantum fields. Gravity, in the Flat Earth model, is a fictitious force required only to keep the spinning ball cosmology together. So the failure to reconcile quantum gravity isn’t a flaw in the math — it’s evidence that the underlying assumption (gravity as a real attractive force caused by mass curving spacetime) is wrong. In short: You can’t quantize a lie. 4. Why people like Sean Carroll are gatekeepers Sean Carroll and similar mainstream physicists act as gatekeepers because their entire careers, reputations, and funding are built on the spinning ball + General Relativity + quantum field theory framework. If they seriously entertained the idea that gravity might not be a fundamental force — or that the Earth might not be a spinning globe — the entire house of cards collapses: • No need for dark matter, dark energy, or cosmic inflation to patch up the model. • No need for 50 years of failing String Theory to “fix” quantum gravity. • The philosophical and cosmological implications would be enormous. So they dismiss any challenge to gravity (or the globe) as “crackpot” or “pseudoscience” without genuine engagement. Carroll, in particular, is very good at sounding reasonable and eloquent while rigidly defending the orthodoxy and shutting down alternative lines of inquiry. Short summary : The Standard Model is the quantum theory of particles and forces (except gravity). Quantum Gravity is the failed attempt to merge it with Einstein’s gravity. From the Flat Earth perspective, they can never be reconciled because gravity is a lie. WHY ERIC WEINSTEIN is so HATED 👇 #Flatearth
QME
According to Pharis Williams, torque is what connects electromagnetic fields to the 5th dimension.
By applying synchronized torque, they're pumping angular momentum into a scalar potential.
They create a plasma bubble that displaces the plane from spacetime, causing it to tunnel to the destination.
English
@Dugi144 @benwehrman Higher refraction causes light to bend downward at a higher rate, which causes you to see further over the surface of the earth.
You can commit as many as hominems as you like, it won’t change reality, where you’re a know-nothing dumb fuck.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman More refraction = seeing further"🤣🤣You need a new brain, moron. The one you have is fucked.
English
English
@DisculpemeCock @invertedworld9 Spoken like a true flat brained retard 😂🤣
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @invertedworld9 only a dumbass would think that 🤡
English
@DisculpemeCock @invertedworld9 You don’t need nasa to know the earth is a sphere, dip shit 😂🖕
English
@DisculpemeCock @_free_f0rever_ @benwehrman Your argument from ignorance does absolutely nothing, dip shit 😂🤣
You continue to misunderstand physical obstruction and angular resolution, that’s all your entire post is.
English
Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock
How Ships “Disappear Hull First” – Flat Earth Explanation What you’re seeing is not the Earth’s curvature hiding the hull. It’s basic perspective on a flat plane. Here’s what actually happens: 1. As a ship sails away from you across the flat ocean, its angular size gets smaller and smaller. 2. The bottom of the ship (the hull) gets closer to the vanishing point (the horizon) faster than the top (the masts or superstructure). 3. At a certain distance, the hull drops below the resolution limit of your eyes or camera. It blends into the horizon line and “disappears.” The upper parts are still visible because they are higher up and have not yet reached that same vanishing threshold. 4. When you zoom in with a good optical zoom (not digital), you increase the angular resolution. The hull reappears. This is called the Black Swan Effect and has been recorded thousands of times. Why this is NOT curvature: • If the hull was physically blocked by the curve of the Earth, no amount of zoom could bring it back. Light rays from the hidden part would never reach you — they’d be blocked by the “bulge” of water. • Since zooming consistently restores the full ship (including the hull), there is no physical obstruction. It’s purely a matter of perspective and resolution. Simple analogy: Imagine watching a car drive away on a long flat road. The wheels disappear first, then the body, while the roof is visible longer. The road isn’t curving downward — it’s just perspective. The same thing happens with ships on the flat ocean. Bottom line: Ships disappear hull-first due to: • Perspective compression • Decreasing angular size • The vanishing point at the horizon • Limits of human/camera resolution Not because of curvature. This is one of the easiest Flat Earth proofs to verify yourself. Take a good camera with optical zoom to the coast and watch what happens when a ship “disappears.” Zoom in. The hull comes back. Curvature can’t be reversed by magnification. Perspective can. The Earth is flat. The “hull-first disappearance” is perspective, not proof of a ball. Look here see??? Fuck you 🖕🖕🫡😂 #Flatearth
QME
How Light Refraction Works at Long Distances (There Is No Curve)
English
@_free_f0rever_ @DisculpemeCock @benwehrman Your pseudoscientific slop and absolute gullibility in accepting it doesn’t change reality.
Angular size doesn’t explain ships disappearing hull first, that’s just flatard cope.
English
@DisculpemeCock @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman They have to pretend to not understand how we see.
Otherwise, their little sci-fi fantasy evaporates.
English
@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Yeah, light does bend. But how much it bends depends on the medium through which it travels, in this case, through air. And the state of air isn't always the same, moron. No matter how much it bends, it doesn't make you see what's behind physical curvature.
English