Mike Blake-Butler 🇬🇧🇸🇬🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

This is Shukri Yusuf - a migrant from Somalia. She fraudulently claimed £102,000 in benefits, which she spent on private school fees and a luxury car. She walked free from court with a suspended sentence. Meanwhile, white people are jailed for tweets. 🇬🇧 #twotierjustice

Bescot train station, 10 minutes from me, barely in the news for just one day.

Did you ask the people you represent? Was this in your manifesto? Of course you didn't. Of course it isn't. You are all corrupt traitors, you cannot be replaced quickly enough.

🚨All four of our local MP's in Sandwell have voted to scrap your right to a jury trial. For centuries, trial by jury has been a cornerstone of British justice — ensuring that ordinary people, not just the state, decide guilt or innocence. But MPs have now backed plans that would remove that right in thousands of cases. Less oversight. More power handed to the system. Fewer protections for ordinary citizens. This isn’t progress — it’s the erosion of a fundamental safeguard. When the right to be judged by your peers is weakened, everyone should pay attention. #TrialByJury #Justice #CivilLiberties #Tipton #Wednesbury #WestBrom #WestBromwich #Smethwick #Halesowen #Labour #KeirStarmer #DavidLammy #Jury #Trial

Labour MPs: "The country's a tinderbox at the moment what shall we do?" "Introduce blasphemy laws, that should calm things down."

Dear Prime Minister & Home Secretary, I hope this letter finds you well, fully caffeinated, and in possession of a calculator. I’m writing with what I believe is a modest, fiscally responsible proposal. I understand the Government is offering up to £40,000 to certain individuals to voluntarily leave the United Kingdom. First of all — bold strategy. Nothing says “strong borders” quite like a cashback scheme. Now, I regret to inform you that I am, in fact, a fully tax-paying, law-abiding British citizen. I know — awkward. I appreciate this may disqualify me from the premium exit package, but I’m willing to negotiate. I would like to formally apply for £35,000 to leave. You see, unlike some applicants, I haven’t broken any laws to get here. I didn’t arrive by dinghy. I didn’t require processing, housing, or legal appeals. I’ve actually been funding the whole operation through PAYE for years — which I believe makes me a loyal shareholder in this enterprise. Given that you’re prepared to offer £40,000 for someone to depart voluntarily after entering illegally, I feel £35,000 for someone who’s been here legally all along represents excellent value for money. Think of it as a “Buy British, Get One Gone” discount. For £35,000 I will:    •   Leave quietly.    •   Not require a press conference.    •   Not demand a diversity officer to wave me off.    •   Even carry my own suitcase to the airport. I may also tweet a polite thank-you note on departure, praising the efficiency of the scheme. Frankly, it feels like I’ve misunderstood how incentives work in modern Britain. All these years I thought obeying the law, paying taxes, and contributing to society were the winning strategy. Turns out the real pro-move is to arrive unlawfully and wait for a loyalty bonus. Who knew? While British families are juggling rent, energy bills, and the weekly food shop like contestants on a dystopian game show, it’s reassuring to know the Treasury has located a spare £40,000 per head for voluntary goodbyes. May I ask — is there a points card? Ten years of National Insurance contributions and I get a free exit bonus? If so, I believe I’m overdue. In the spirit of fairness and fiscal responsibility, I am not even asking for the full £40,000. I’m trimming £5,000 off to help balance the books. That’s the kind of responsible budgeting I was raised on. If successful, I promise to:    •   Leave via a scheduled flight (economy is fine).    •   Not stage a protest on the runway.    •   And refrain from re-entering on a small boat to see if I qualify twice. All I ask is equal treatment. If departure is now a funded career pathway, I would very much like to submit my CV. Yours in hopeful relocation, A slightly confused taxpayer

@Keir_Starmer I would honestly rather a toddler was running the economy. We would then at least have a random chance of hitting a correct decision or two - they can understand incentives which is one up on your crap pick. In any fair capitalist society, Reeves would be cleaning shoes.

Keir Starmer is the most dangerous prime minister in history. He has NO RIGHT to stand in front of our nation's flag. The man is a traitor. We need an *immediate* general election.

With the E – 2D Hawkeye circling above the Gulf of Oman at 20,000 feet the Iranian Salvo of 52 assorted missiles didn’t make a scratch on the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group. This United States Navy surveillance aircraft can monitor threats as far as 500 km. - Iran launched a coordinated attack of 52 missiles targeting the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group in the Gulf of Oman at approximately 2:23 AM. - Missile breakdown: - 28 × Ghadr Fars anti-ship ballistic missiles. - 16 × Emad medium-range ballistic missiles. - 8 × Hormuz-2 anti-radar missiles. - Detection: An E-2D Advanced Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft (flying at ~25,000 feet) detected all 52 inbound missile tracks during their boost phase using its AN/APY-9 radar. - Response time: The Hawkeye crew identified and cataloged the threats in under 40 seconds, then transmitted firing assignments via Link 16 data link. - Interception: The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group (using Naval Integrated Fire Control Counter Air - NIFC-CA architecture) engaged via Aegis combat systems on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (specifically named: USS Frank E. Petersen Jr., USS Pruance, USS Michael Murphy). - Outcome: All 52 missiles were successfully intercepted within eight minutes; no impacts on the carrier or group. - Additional context in narration: - Iran's missile arsenal was significantly depleted/weakened by prior Israeli strikes in June 2025. - Iranian media/claims of a successful hit or damage to the Lincoln are dismissed as false propaganda.

Oh dear the Green con artist has been caught out 😂

Amazing science experiments to do with your kids this weekend.

hey @grok, please put Daz in a pair of speedos

Regardless of what you're dealing with, keep in mind that a reggae version of Led Zeppelin featuring Elvis Presley on vocals actually exists.

@dom_lucre cv I bc65 I 4y56l4

🔥🚨BREAKING: This man was in pure disbelief when he spotted one of the infected papillomavirus rabbits with horns called ‘Frankenstein Bunnies’ that were originally reported in Colorado in Downtown Sioux Falls in South Dakota.

😂😂😂😂

@w_terrence kautysdz

I shared something deeply personal this week —getting my foster care records. And what did these woke Therapists say? That my story somehow “went wrong” because I support President Trump. Let me make one thing clear: I didn’t end up on drugs, in prison, or blaming the world. I BUILT something. I started my food company CousinTs.com from scratch. I wrote “From the Foster House to the White House” and a children’s book called “Little Kid Who Can.” I’m not a victim. I’m a fighter. I’m a builder. I’m a VICTOR. To everyone who’s shown love, shared my posts, bought my books or tried my food—thank you. You’re helping me prove the haters wrong every single day. I hope my books can inspire others to let go of the Victimhood Mentality and be a Victor You can find my books & food at 👉 CousinTs.com

Further to the news that the UK is going to spend £50 million on geoengineering experiments, being a chemist and having subsidiary degrees in other relevant arenas, I have done some top line research into the H&S implications of the chemicals that are being considered: - Sulphur dioxide: Used in stratospheric aerosol injection to form reflective aerosols that mimic volcanic eruptions, reflecting sunlight back into space. Risks: Respiratory Issues: Inhalation can irritate the lungs, causing asthma attacks, bronchitis, or worsening chronic respiratory conditions. Prolonged exposure may lead to reduced lung function. Acid Rain: Increased atmospheric sulphur dioxide could contribute to acid rain, indirectly affecting respiratory health by polluting air and water sources. Cardiovascular Risks: Fine sulphate aerosols may penetrate the bloodstream via inhalation, potentially increasing risks of heart disease or stroke. - Calcium carbonate: Proposed for stratospheric injection, potentially less harmful than sulphates, with possible benefits for ozone repair. Risks: Low Toxicity: Generally considered safer, but inhalation of fine particles could cause mild respiratory irritation or discomfort, especially in high concentrations. Environmental Deposition: If particles settle in water or soil, they could alter pH levels, potentially affecting ecosystems and indirectly impacting human health through food or water contamination. - Sea salt: Utilized in marine cloud brightening, where fine sea-salt particles are sprayed into low-lying clouds to enhance their reflectivity. Risks: Minimal Direct Risk: Sea salt is relatively benign, but large-scale spraying could increase atmospheric salinity, potentially irritating eyes, skin, or respiratory tracts in coastal areas. Indirect Effects: Altering cloud patterns might affect local climates, potentially impacting agriculture or water availability, with downstream health consequences. - Cellulose nanocrystals: Biodegradable particles derived from wood or cotton, studied as a potential alternative for stratospheric injection. Risks: Unknown Long-Term Effects: As biodegradable nanomaterials, they are considered low-risk, but inhalation of nanoparticles could cause lung inflammation or allergic reactions. Long-term health impacts are understudied. Bioaccumulation: Potential for accumulation in the environment or human tissues is not fully understood, raising concerns about chronic exposure. - Aluminum oxide: Mentioned in some discussions as a reflective aerosol, though less commonly cited in the UK context. Risks: Neurotoxicity: Inhalation of fine aluminum oxide particles may pose risks to the nervous system, with some studies linking aluminum exposure to cognitive impairments or Alzheimer’s-like effects. Respiratory Damage: Chronic exposure could lead to lung fibrosis or other pulmonary issues, particularly in high concentrations. Environmental Contamination: Deposition in soil or water could disrupt ecosystems, potentially affecting food chains and human health. - Sulphuric acid: Considered in some models for aerosol injection, but its use is controversial due to environmental risks. Risks: Severe Irritation: Inhalation or contact can cause burns to the skin, eyes, or respiratory tract. Even low-level exposure may exacerbate asthma or cause throat irritation. Aerosol Risks: Fine sulphuric acid aerosols can penetrate deep into the lungs, potentially causing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cardiovascular issues. Ozone Depletion: Increased sulphuric acid in the stratosphere could deplete ozone, raising UV exposure and skin cancer risks. There have also been assumptions made about the use of barium and iron although these are said to be 'conspiracy theories'. One would hope so because for iron atmospheric aerosol effects on ecological and human health remain uncertain due to their highly complex and evolving nature when suspended in air. With regard to barium, it is known that there is concern on several severe systemic effects in the body to exposure of barium. Although this is topline, my view is that without rigorous investigation of the risks outlined above, the government is being thoroughly irresponsible if they agree to running these trials. That comment applies to any government globally who are also involved in this. If business took such a cavalier approach to products and the potential dangers caused by their products, government agencies would rightly take strong actions. Government needs to abide by the same common sense rules.

@MidwesternDoc Meanwhile, another scientist, John Yudkin, warned that sugar added to food by the processed food industry was the real culprit. Which seems like a valid hypothesis. But what happened? You can probably guess… midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-ch…

🚨 In the last 24 hours, a leaked report revealed that Labour *admits* Ed Miliband's Net Zero insanity will OBLITERATE the economy. Meanwhile, economic figures show Rachel Reeves is already destroying it. Why do these two colossal failures still have a job?

what is the purpose of this part of a towel?