nullxiety

Midtown - Overwatch 2

Estos gringos izquierdistas tontos ¿De qué sirve tener supuestamente un sistema gratuito de salud? Si en Canadá prefieren hacerte eutanasia y en México no hay ni equipo, ni medicinas ni instalaciones Con que así se sienten los cubanos cuando ésta gente habla bien del régimen

Reseña de Don't Starve Together

tracking the period cycles of your league duos can lead to increased winrates i have 147 games of data on this. my friend yuulu tweeted about it earlier because she finally saw the CRM i've been keeping on her for months. overall winrate with her sits at 55.1%. on period games? 52%. off period? 57.5%. that's a 5.5% delta over 5 tracked cycles with a 94.3% confidence. the data doesn't lie. I have an excel with our accounts linked up to riots api and it pulls data based on kda, damage dealt & winrate. during her period her aggression rating spikes to 8.6 out of 10 based on damage dealt and deaths. that means during her period i'm playing TRISTANA. rocket jumping into every fight. matching her chaos with my chaos. if she's gonna flash forward i'm gonna flash forward with her. we're both committing war crimes at the SAME TIME off period? completely different player. aggression drops to 4.85. plays calculated. kda higher due to dying less. best vision score. she's entering her peak janna phase. so when she's off period i'm locking VAYNE. patient. scaling. tumbling around and waiting for good opportunities to fight. we play a slow methodical lane and farm up to late game. that's where we pop off. the 57.5% winrate off period comes from this coordination. we're not just playing league. we're playing league AROUND her HORMONAL CYCLES. most of you can't even tell when your duo is tilted after 3 games. i can tell when mine is entering the pre-menstrual aggression window 3 days out based on over-aggressive timers alone. her next cycle starts april 17th at 9:36am. 5.2 day duration estimated. i've already shifted my youtube content creation strategy around this for viewers to be prepared for more Tristana commentaries. this is the level of commitment required to climb with a duo. you think you can just queue up with your friend and vibe your way to challenger? no. you need DATA. you need ANALYSIS. you need to know what play style she's locking BEFORE she locks it based on where she is in her cycle. yuulu thought i was crazy when i told her the prediction. she opened her health app. told me her app predicted her period to be between April 15th - April 19th. my CRM beat her own body's tracking Study the Saskio way

Lo cansona que debe ser esa tipa para que él se vaya solo a lugares para tener paz.

@itsD3lay Los bebés si los dejas solos un segundo:

@itsD3lay No se pero tengo entendido que si dejas al bebé suelto el muy hijodeputa buscará una manera de matarse

@mund_ola sin mencionar que son las propias mujeres las que buscan ese tipo de cuerpo, no conozco ni un solo hombre heterosexual que le gusten así.

Literalmente conozco un total de cero (0) unidades de hombres para los que el cuerpo de la chica de la foto sea su estándar. Estáis perdidísimas.

@Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s me when i don't have any coherent arguments left so i just use the other persons age as one

@nullxiety_ @Nasengold1 @venom1s why am i arguing with a child about women's bodies lmao

To achieve the left one, women just have to eat less. While to achieve the one on the right, men have to spend hours for years in the gym.

@intruder1461368 @canustopcryingb @TheFakestReal22 @venom1s most men with the right guys physique do take roids

@canustopcryingb @nullxiety_ @TheFakestReal22 @venom1s Maybe he take roids

@soojcard the girl on the left is not malnourished btw

they want you weak and malnourished so you can’t fight back.

@PontePepe @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan te invito a que vuelvas a leer el post original, el repost, la chica a la que respondí y mi respuesta, porque en ningún momento se mencionó dejar con hambre a alguien más, por eso asumiré que estás baiteando, pero no veo el verificado y eso me preocupa.

@nullxiety_ @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan El post original, el repost, la chica a la que respondiste, y tu misma respuesta.

La bruja esta dándose cuenta de que un cuerpo de +1,90 necesita comer más que uno de -1,70

@PontePepe @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan ok pero quién habló de dejar con hambre a los demás? jajaja

@nullxiety_ @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan Puedes tener hambre y comer rápido, pero no pasar por encima del hambre de las mujeres a tu alrededor. Generalmente ellas comen menos, y si se quejan de que no les dan, es porque no les tocó prácticamente nada. En cuestión de HAMBRE todos tienen las mismas necesidades.

@MaryWanna13 @venom1s she's not though, that bf% is healthy and i'm not talking about bmi cuz it's not a good indicator.

@nullxiety_ @venom1s Again, I don't know that much about estimating bf% so I'm not gonna debate it, but the whole topic is irrelevant to BMI and whether or not she is underweight. She very clearly looks underweight

@KindaLuckyLachy @Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s i'm not replying to the original post am i?

@nullxiety_ @Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s Women need a higher body fat percentage... what's your point? The original post is talking about the difficulty of achieving said body. What the hell is going on in this comment section? Why does everyone here have lukewarm iq? Is this a bot comment section?

@PontePepe @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan el detalle es, ¿cómo sabes que al final no comieron más o menos lo mismo o que él le dejó su mitad a la chica? yo mido 2,03, peso 130kg y también sé de lo que hablo, comer más rápido no significa que la vaya a dejar sin comida.

@nullxiety_ @jopyrodriguez @NoSoyJuanan La respuesta más rebuscada de todo el post. Cada persona siente hambre y no tiene que ir de hambreada quitando comida. Yo mido 1.93, peso 105kg de músculo, como cómo un animal, pero antes me aseguro de de que todos tengan, y no me "debilito" por comer menos un día.

@Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s i'm sorry but me being young doesn't mean i'm wrong lol, also looking slimmer doesn’t necessarily mean lower body fat. bone structure, fat distribution and muscle mass can make someone look smaller even at a higher bf.

@nullxiety_ @Nasengold1 @venom1s theres hardly any fat on that girl again you're wrong but you're a young boy so i guess its understandable

@Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s exactly, she doesn’t have much muscle, that’s why there’s no definition. but that doesn’t mean she’s extremely low body fat. you can look flat and still be in a normal range, because definition depends on both muscle and body fat, not just one.

@nullxiety_ @Nasengold1 @venom1s she doesnt show definition because she doesnt have any. i have abs because i train, women who are low bf without muscles dont have abs.

@MaryWanna13 @venom1s not seeing visible fat doesn't mean she's lower than that. women carry fat more evenly and can look "flat" without being in the mid-teens. if her bf was lower you'd usually see much sharper definition.

@nullxiety_ @venom1s Body fat where? Leanness doesn't really have anything to do with the underweight point because it's not unhealthy to have a low BF if you have a lot of muscle, but regardless, body fat where? She has hardly any fat on her belly and thighs, which is where women tend to store fat.

@Scarletjoestar @Nasengold1 @venom1s lighting, fat distribution and lack of muscle definition can make people look leaner than they actually are. 15% in women usually shows significantly more definition than that. she looks lean, but more in a normal healthy range than extremely low bf.

@nullxiety_ @Nasengold1 @venom1s 20%? are you wild? i'm around 15% and shes leaner than me , what are you on lol tell me you don't know women's bf % without telling me you don't know women's bf %