abu bouli al boulali

783 posts

abu bouli al boulali banner
abu bouli al boulali

abu bouli al boulali

@searchspIoit

noob

Se unió Kasım 2009
210 Siguiendo59 Seguidores
le T ou le G 🇸🇲
le T ou le G 🇸🇲@Gonzo2bx·
Ça a fait exploser une bombe à la chicha de la barrière de saint Gilles
Français
2
0
6
457
Tohonesty Limited
Tohonesty Limited@tohonestycom·
All ciphers have already been cracked. By state actors. The only ciphers which the public are allowed to use are cracked. IF the state could not crack them, they would be shut down immediately. Any state announcement asking a private enterprise to give them access is a hoax to signal to the people to mask that is has cracked it.
English
1
5
14
846
Secure Privacy
Secure Privacy@SecurePrivacyAI·
"Privacy is dead." Then why do: CEOs use encrypted phones. Executives demand NDAs from staff. Billionaires build compounds with no public address. Privacy didn't die. It was redistributed upward.
English
30
1.1K
3.9K
34K
abu bouli al boulali retuiteado
CrowINT
CrowINT@crow_int·
🚨 Décryptage : Quand #Palantir transforme Cyberpunk 2077 en programme politique, dirigé par les Lex Luthor de la Silicon Valley. Le manifeste Dans La République Technologique, Alex Karp et Nicholas Zamiska théorisent que la Silicon Valley a une "dette morale" envers les États-Unis et doit forger le "hard power" du siècle. Traduction : l'#IA militaire, la surveillance de masse et la refonte de l'État fédéral à l'image d'une start-up. Un discours patriotique séduisant qui masque la fusion d'une mégacorporation avec les leviers du pouvoir réel. La privatisation de la guerre (Palantir = Militech) Dans Cyberpunk 2077, Militech sous-traite la guerre et devient indissociable de l'armée. C'est aujourd'hui une réalité documentée. Karp l'assume frontalement : Palantir "effraie ses ennemis, et à l'occasion, les tue." Son IA militaire (Project Maven) a fusionné de multiples systèmes militaires distincts en une seule interface pour compresser la "kill chain" de plusieurs heures à quelques minutes. Résultat concret : lors de l'opération "Epic Fury" en Iran (lancée le 28 février 2026), plus de 5 000 cibles frappées dans les dix premiers jours selon la fiche officielle du Pentagone, dont environ 1 000 priorisées par le système dans les seules premières 24 heures. Cerise dystopique : Maven intègre Claude, le modèle d'Anthropic, pour analyser les cibles et classer leur importance stratégique. Anthropic avait pourtant refusé d'autoriser un usage pour des armes entièrement autonomes ou la surveillance de masse de citoyens américains. L'armée a rétorqué en le désignant "risque pour la chaîne d'approvisionnement nationale", une étiquette jusqu'alors réservée aux entreprises liées à des adversaires étrangers. Un juge fédéral a qualifié la mesure d'"orwellienne" et l'a partiellement bloquée. Officiellement, "il y a toujours un humain dans la boucle." Dans la pratique, cet humain valide des listes de cibles générées algorithmiquement sous pression temporelle. Ce n'est plus de la guerre : c'est l'industrialisation algorithmique de la mort. L'assimilation de l'État (Méthode LexCorp) Lex Luthor ne renverse pas la démocratie, il l'infiltre jusqu'à en devenir indispensable. Palantir suit le même mode opératoire. Lancée avec des fonds de la CIA via In-Q-Tel, l'entreprise a progressivement digéré l'appareil fédéral. En juin 2025, le CTO Shyam Sankar est intronisé lieutenant-colonel de l'US Army Reserve, dans le cadre du tout nouveau "Detachment 201 : Executive Innovation Corps". À ses côtés : Andrew Bosworth, CTO de Meta, Kevin Weil (alors CPO d'OpenAI), et Bob McGrew, ancien Chief Research Officer d'OpenAI. Ce n'est plus une coïncidence : c'est la fusion institutionnalisée de la Silicon Valley avec l'armée. Le manifeste critique les fonctionnaires ("Ils ne doivent pas être nos prêtres") pendant que Palantir les remplace un à un. Ce n'est plus un partenariat public-privé. C'est une OPA sur l'État régalien. Le contrôle social algorithmique (Bienvenue à Night City) Le manifeste fustige le "pluralisme vide" occidental et le droit à l'erreur des sociétés libérales. La réponse concrète de Palantir se traduit par des outils de surveillance dignes du Night City de Cyberpunk : ImmigrationOS : 30 millions de dollars versés par ICE à Palantir (contrat avril 2025) pour la traque des sans-papiers, l'approbation des raids, la génération automatique de documents juridiques et le routage vers les centres de détention, le tout depuis une interface unique. ELITE : outil complémentaire qui cartographie les "cibles potentielles" d'expulsion, génère leurs dossiers et assigne un "score de confiance" à leur adresse actuelle, en croisant données HHS et autres bases fédérales. Police prédictive (La Nouvelle-Orléans) : analyse des réseaux sociaux, casiers judiciaires et comportements pour "anticiper" les crimes, transformant la présomption d'innocence en variable statistique. Le manifeste s'arroge en parallèle le droit de juger quelles cultures sont "progressives" ou "régressives". Des ingénieurs non élus, sans mandat démocratique, décident de la hiérarchie des civilisations. Le profil des fondateurs (Peter Thiel = Lex Luthor) Ce n'est pas une métaphore gratuite, c'est la lecture que fait internet lui-même depuis des années, et elle colle parfaitement. Peter Thiel : milliardaire libertarien, obsédé par l'immortalité et le transhumanisme, qui finance des projets politiques dans l'ombre avec un mépris affiché pour la démocratie traditionnelle. Il l'a d'ailleurs théorisé noir sur blanc : en 2009, dans l'essai "The Education of a Libertarian" publié sur Cato Unbound, il écrit que "la liberté et la démocratie ne sont plus compatibles". Pas une provocation de comptoir : une conviction philosophique fondatrice, assumée publiquement par le cofondateur de l'entreprise qui gère aujourd'hui les données militaires et migratoires de l'État américain. Alex Karp, lui, incarne l'autre face du duo : doctorat de philosophie néo-marxiste, cheveux ébouriffés, tenue de sport et déclarations glaçantes sur la létalité de ses logiciels. Comme Lex Luthor, ils se voient comme les héros pragmatiques d'un récit où la démocratie est une entrave naïve et où seule l'élite technologique (la leur) peut garantir l'ordre mondial. L'illusion de la "République Technologique" Le cynisme absolu du manifeste atteint son sommet au point 6 : "Le service national doit être un devoir universel." Entendez : les citoyens ordinaires portent les armes et partagent le risque, pendant que Karp, Thiel et leurs actionnaires restent intouchables et continuent à décider qui vit et qui meurt via leurs algorithmes. Palantir agite la menace chinoise ou russe pour justifier la destruction des garde-fous démocratiques. Ce qu'ils appellent la "République Technologique" est en réalité une ploutocratie algorithmique : le centre de commandement politique a quitté Washington pour les serveurs d'une milice corporatiste qui n'a jamais eu à se soumettre aux urnes. La fiction de Mike Pondsmith (Cyberpunk) et les comics DC (LexCorp) décrivaient cet avenir comme une dystopie. Karp et Thiel le vendent comme un projet de civilisation. L'Occident ne sauvera pas sa démocratie en en confiant les clés à ceux qui ont écrit, noir sur blanc, qu'elle était incompatible avec la liberté.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

Français
1
19
38
3.5K
abu bouli al boulali retuiteado
Christophe Boutry
Christophe Boutry@Ced_haurus·
Palantir vient de publier son manifeste. Lisez-le. Pas pour ce qu'il dit sur la tech. Pour ce qu'il dit sur le politique. Sur l'idéologie de Karp et Thiel. Sur la guerre. Sur vous. Quand une entreprise privée se donne pour mission de définir qui doit être surveillé, ciblé, prédit, neutralisé, et qu'elle publie simultanément un texte expliquant pourquoi contester cela serait de la faiblesse civilisationnelle, on n'est plus dans la stratégie d'entreprise. On est dans la privatisation du souverain. Le droit de décider de l'ennemi, qui fut toujours le geste politique fondateur des États, est en train d'être racheté par une entreprise cotée au Nasdaq. Ce manifeste repose sur un seul tour de passe-passe, répété sous vingt formes différentes : rendre l'inévitable ce qui est en réalité un choix. Les armes à IA ? Elles seront construites de toute façon, alors autant que ce soit nous. La surveillance algorithmique ? La réalité géopolitique l'exige. Le réarmement de l'Occident, la hiérarchie des cultures, la disqualification du pluralisme comme naïveté dangereuse ? Simple lucidité face au monde tel qu'il est. C'est le geste idéologique par excellence : ne pas interdire la question, mais la rendre indécente. Ce que Palantir appelle réalisme est en fait une décision philosophique radicale : le conflit est la vérité permanente du monde, la délibération démocratique est une fragilité que l'adversaire exploitera, et une élite technologique privée est mieux placée qu'un peuple pour tirer les conséquences de cette vérité. C'est du schmittisme en hoodie. C'est littéralement la structure de leur pensée. Le danger n'est pas qu'ils soient fous. Le danger est qu'ils soient riches, cohérents, et déjà à l'intérieur des États. Palantir ne frappe pas à la porte des gouvernements pour vendre un outil. Elle arrive avec une cosmologie complète : voici comment fonctionne le monde, voici vos ennemis, voici pourquoi vous ne pouvez pas vous permettre de débattre, et voici notre contrat. Palantir est l'ennemie des peuples et de la démocratie. Ce qu'ils construisent, c'est un pouvoir technocratique que personne n'a élu et que personne ne pourra destituer.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

Français
23
184
589
40.9K
peine de maure 🇨🇼!
peine de maure 🇨🇼!@kippacabana75·
Les frères si vous m’avez envoyé un message récemment et que g pas rep c paske g pas vu car mes dm sont auto delete tout les 3j a cause de elon de merde
Français
4
0
4
619
Jehmy
Jehmy@darkskinjh44534·
@justbyte_ Use telegram instead, I love my privacy
English
5
3
158
62.5K
Aryan
Aryan@justbyte_·
- create a new instagram account - go private - post all your files - unlimited free cloud storage That's it bro...
Aryan tweet media
English
374
1.4K
52.5K
4M
Princesse
Princesse@pouletcru5__·
On a croisé Bouli wshh
Princesse tweet media
Français
2
0
4
113
abu bouli al boulali
abu bouli al boulali@searchspIoit·
@gigdotzip @fs0c131y Le but final pour un attaquant dans la faille du PIN est de prendre le contrôle du token de l'user, jexplique juste que t'as pas besoin d'accès au téléphone et d'un accès root pour l'obtenir
Français
0
0
0
7
Dan 🪛
Dan 🪛@gigdotzip·
@searchspIoit @fs0c131y this has nothing to do with that i’m talking about or what is shown in the vid im replying to
English
1
0
0
10
Baptiste Robert
Baptiste Robert@fs0c131y·
Je confirme, Paul is right
Paul Moore - Security Consultant @Paul_Reviews

Hacking the #EU #AgeVerification app in under 2 minutes. During setup, the app asks you to create a PIN. After entry, the app *encrypts* it and saves it in the shared_prefs directory. 1. It shouldn't be encrypted at all - that's a really poor design. 2. It's not cryptographically tied to the vault which contains the identity data. So, an attacker can simply remove the PinEnc/PinIV values from the shared_prefs file and restart the app. After choosing a different PIN, the app presents credentials created under the old profile and let's the attacker present them as valid. Other issues: 1. Rate limiting is an incrementing number in the same config file. Just reset it to 0 and keep trying. 2. "UseBiometricAuth" is a boolean, also in the same file. Set it to false and it just skips that step. Seriously @vonderleyen - this product will be the catalyst for an enormous breach at some point. It's just a matter of time.

Português
13
67
471
90.7K

Descubrir

@LeSpectreRouge @161Antifa1312 @Gonzo2bx @YouTube @bojoursamba @ladyblackcatt @ppppppp32221 @AgentKiffeur