wonderBe💫

🚨 BREAKING: In an incredible moment, President Trump just shook hands with El Salvador's right-wing President NAYIB BUKELE in Florida Bukele is an AMAZING ally! 🇺🇸🇸🇻 He has caused a record -98% reduction in homicides because he is tough-on-crime El Salvador is now one of the SAFEST countries in the western hemisphere and has become an "economic miracle" Bukele is a true masterclass.

هم‌میهنان عزیزم، ملت بزرگ ایران، به همه شما که در این ۱۰۰ روز برای آزادی و بازپس‌گیری ایران ایستادید؛ با فداکاری در برابر گلوله‌ها سینه سپر کردید و در ۴۰ روز گذشته خطر بمباران را به جان خریدید، درود می‌فرستم. می‌دانم خبر آتش‌بس دوهفته‌ای میان جمهوری اسلامی با آمریکا و اسرائیل، بسیاری از شما را دلسرد کرده است. اما امروز، نه زمان ناامیدی، که زمان باور بیشتر به پیروزی است. آنچه در این ۴۰ روز رخ داد، دقیقاً در مسیر همان مطالباتی است که ملت ایران از جامعه جهانی خواست و بعد از جان‌فشانی در خیابان‌های ایران، در تظاهرات روز جهانی اقدام در ۱۴ فوریه (۲۵ بهمن) نیز فریاد زد. ضرباتی که در تنها ۴۰ روز بر پیکر جمهوری اسلامی وارد شد، بی‌سابقه بوده، و برای این رژیم جبران‌ناپذیر است. حذف علی خامنه‌ای، قاتل ده‌ها هزار ایرانی شجاع، به‌تنهایی دستاوردی تاریخی برای ملت ماست. حال آنکه، به جز او، ده‌ها تن از فرماندهان و عاملان اصلی سرکوب در سپاه و بسیج و دستگاه‌های اطلاعاتی رژیم نیز از میان برداشته شدند. هزاران نیروی سرکوب به هلاکت رسیدند. ساختار فرماندهی و کنترل سرکوب، فلج شده و فرو پاشیده است. زیرساخت‌های نظامی‌، که نه برای دفاع از ایران، بلکه برای صدور تروریسم و بی‌ثباتی ساخته شده بودند، نابود شده‌اند. منابع مالی رژیم برای سرکوب در داخل و تروریسم در خارج، به‌شدت کاهش یافته است. جمهوری اسلامی امروز در منطقه و جهان از همیشه منزوی‌تر و منفورتر است. آنچه برای این رژیم باقی مانده، تکیه بر مزدوران بیگانه و اقلیتی خون‌ریز و خون‌شوی است که منافع‌شان در بقای این رژیم است؛ رژیمی که در میدان واقعیت شکستی سخت خورده، اما با قطع اینترنت به ۹۰ میلیون ایرانی، و از طریق ماشین دروغ‌پردازی‌اش، هنوز ژست پیروزی می‌گیرد و رجز می‌خواند. آنها که مدعی بودند هرگز تن به آتش‌بس نمی‌دهند، امروز هم رهبر و فرماندهان‌شان را از دست داده‌اند، هم جنگ را باخته‌اند، هم آتش‌بس را پذیرفته‌اند، و هم به میز مذاکره برای تسلیم کامل کشانده شده‌اند. ما اما از آغاز می‌دانستیم که جمهوری اسلامی تنها با حذف فرماندهی و تضعیف دستگاه سرکوب از طریق حملات هوایی، سقوط نمی‌کند. از همین رو بود که در تمام پیام‌هایم به شما تاکید کردم که این ما ملت ایران هستیم که باید ضربه نهایی را به رژیم ضعیف‌شده وارد و آن را سرنگون کنیم. می‌خواهم بدانید که من وضعیت شما در ایران را بسیار دقیق زیر نظر دارم. می‌دانم که جمهوری اسلامی بسیار تضعیف شده اما هنوز توانایی سرکوب آن به طور کامل از بین نرفته است. همه هدف من این است که اقدام نهایی برای سرنگون کردن جمهوری اسلامی با کمترین هزینه جانی باشد. جان تک‌تک شما برای من ارزشمند است. پس، از شما می‌خواهم که شکیبا باشید، از خودتان محافظت کنید، و با باور به پیروزی و آمادگی کامل، در انتظار لحظه تعیین‌کننده بمانید. در این فاصله، من و همه هم‌میهنان‌مان در خارج از کشور با تمام توان، خواست شما را که پایان دادن به جمهوری اسلامی است، فریاد خواهیم زد. ایمان داشته باشید که هیچ نیرویی در جهان توان ایستادن در برابر قدرت یک ملت متحد را ندارد. جمهوری اسلامی این بار، راه گریز، و بختی برای بقا ندارد؛ و به دستان پرقدرت شما ملت بزرگ ایران سرنگون خواهد شد. پاینده ایران، رضا پهلوی

Sobre la derrota y humillación de Irán a ojos egipcios Del editor egipcio del periódico Al-Masryoon, Gamal Sultan: ¿Los hitos del “triunfo histórico” de Irán? Puedo comprender las declaraciones de victoria por parte de cualquier bando, aunque en mi opinión, hasta ahora, no son más que esfuerzos propagandísticos, incluida la proclamación del propio Trump, ya que aún no se ha firmado un acuerdo completo y definitivo entre todas las partes. Pero lo que me resulta confuso y carece de toda lógica es el discurso de fuentes oficiales iraníes, sus medios de comunicación, e incluso de los simpatizantes de Irán en el mundo árabe, sobre una supuesta derrota histórica de Estados Unidos. Si EEUU y su aliada lograron, durante 40 días de combate, destruir completamente a la élite gobernante iraní —religiosa, militar, política y de seguridad—, desde el líder supremo y su adjunto, pasando por el ministro de defensa, el jefe del estado mayor, el jefe de inteligencia, el presidente del Consejo Nacional de Seguridad, el comandante de los Guardianes de la Revolución, los comandantes de las fuerzas terrestres y navales, el asesor militar del líder supremo, así como todos los niveles de liderazgo de primer y segundo rango; mientras ustedes no lograron alcanzar ni siquiera a un comandante o figura destacada del otro lado; y más aún, para añadir al insulto y la humillación, la alianza estadounidense-israelí incluso anunció que protegía a dos o tres de sus altos funcionarios —entre ellos el ministro de exteriores y el presidente del parlamento— para tener con quién dialogar; entonces, si eso es una victoria, ¿qué sería una derrota? Si sus capacidades navales fueron completamente destruidas, sus barcos descansan hoy en el fondo del mar, sus sistemas de defensa aérea quedaron reducidos a recuerdo, su fuerza aérea está enterrada, la infraestructura de su industria militar quedó en cenizas, la mitad de sus plataformas de lanzamiento de misiles fueron destruidas, y aun así llaman a eso una victoria, ¿entonces qué sería una derrota? Si los aviones enemigos operan sobre ustedes a diario, las 24 horas, desde el norte hasta el sur del país, desde el este hasta el oeste, estableciendo incluso una presencia permanente en los cielos de Teherán, Tabriz, Mashhad, Isfahán y Bandar Abbas —día y noche— mientras ustedes solo se limitan a observar sus vuelos y aterrizajes sin poder detenerlos, si eso no es una derrota militar, ¿qué lo es? Si el enemigo les penetra a nivel de inteligencia en toda su extensión y profundidad, conoce los detalles de sus comunicaciones y movimientos de toda su dirigencia, posee información completa sobre el ciclo diario de actividad en su capital como si fuera un libro abierto, y elimina cada día a cualquier líder que desee, como si cazara pájaros; y aun así ustedes siguen viendo eso como una victoria, entonces ¿qué es una derrota? Si su economía se destruyó casi por completo, sus fábricas fueron arrasadas, sus universidades y centros de investigación reducidos a escombros, sus almacenes de misiles destruidos, y las evaluaciones iniciales hablan de daños de unos 400 mil millones de dólares en solo 40 días de combate, entonces si eso es una victoria, ¿qué es una derrota? Si el único avión enemigo derribado en su territorio aterrizó con sus pilotos frente a ustedes, y aun así no lograron capturar ni a uno solo de ellos mientras los tenían justo delante; si las fuerzas enemigas vinieron desde lejos, realizaron un aterrizaje militar en su territorio, establecieron una zona defensiva armada a la cual no se atrevieron a acercarse, y después rescataron a sus pilotos y retiraron al completo su fuerza militar de Irán sana y salva mientras ustedes observaban todo aquello desde las gradas, entonces si eso no es derrota y humillación manifiesta, ¿qué son la derrota y la humillación? Buena gente, incluso para la fanfarronería vacía hay un límite de lógica y sentido común; no es digno que la rudeza y la ilusión lleguen a un nivel tan humillante.

⚡️Iran issued two statements. One real, one for domestic propaganda. The real one accepted the ceasefire and agreed to coordinate Hormuz passage. The propaganda one claimed total victory, said the US accepted all 10 points, agreed to lift sanctions, accepted enrichment, and would withdraw forces. CNN picked up the propaganda statement and ran it as a headline. Trump called it fraud. CNN says they got it from Iranian officials. Both things can be true at the same time. Iran absolutely put that statement out. And it absolutely doesn’t reflect the actual deal terms. It’s the face-saving layer. The dignity makeup. Tehran needs to tell its own people that they won. That’s how regimes survive moments like this. They sign the surrender and then go home and tell everyone they won. CNN’s error wasn’t reporting that the statement existed. The error was framing it as the definitive Iranian position rather than what it obviously was: domestic propaganda designed to disguise a retreat. Any serious analyst looking at that statement would have immediately recognized it as the regime talking to its own audience, not a real account of what was agreed to. CNN either didn’t see that or didn’t care because the headline was too good. Traditional media can’t distinguish between what a regime says for domestic consumption and what actually happened in the negotiation. This is the noise machine operating as designed. It’s not broken. It’s working perfectly for what it’s built to do. Generate engagement. Drive narratives. Manufacture confusion. The fact that it makes the public less informed about what actually happened tonight is not a bug. Nobody at CNN gets fired for clicks.

⚡️Iran issued two statements. One real, one for domestic propaganda. The real one accepted the ceasefire and agreed to coordinate Hormuz passage. The propaganda one claimed total victory, said the US accepted all 10 points, agreed to lift sanctions, accepted enrichment, and would withdraw forces. CNN picked up the propaganda statement and ran it as a headline. Trump called it fraud. CNN says they got it from Iranian officials. Both things can be true at the same time. Iran absolutely put that statement out. And it absolutely doesn’t reflect the actual deal terms. It’s the face-saving layer. The dignity makeup. Tehran needs to tell its own people that they won. That’s how regimes survive moments like this. They sign the surrender and then go home and tell everyone they won. CNN’s error wasn’t reporting that the statement existed. The error was framing it as the definitive Iranian position rather than what it obviously was: domestic propaganda designed to disguise a retreat. Any serious analyst looking at that statement would have immediately recognized it as the regime talking to its own audience, not a real account of what was agreed to. CNN either didn’t see that or didn’t care because the headline was too good. Traditional media can’t distinguish between what a regime says for domestic consumption and what actually happened in the negotiation. This is the noise machine operating as designed. It’s not broken. It’s working perfectly for what it’s built to do. Generate engagement. Drive narratives. Manufacture confusion. The fact that it makes the public less informed about what actually happened tonight is not a bug. Nobody at CNN gets fired for clicks.

⚡️Iran issued two statements. One real, one for domestic propaganda. The real one accepted the ceasefire and agreed to coordinate Hormuz passage. The propaganda one claimed total victory, said the US accepted all 10 points, agreed to lift sanctions, accepted enrichment, and would withdraw forces. CNN picked up the propaganda statement and ran it as a headline. Trump called it fraud. CNN says they got it from Iranian officials. Both things can be true at the same time. Iran absolutely put that statement out. And it absolutely doesn’t reflect the actual deal terms. It’s the face-saving layer. The dignity makeup. Tehran needs to tell its own people that they won. That’s how regimes survive moments like this. They sign the surrender and then go home and tell everyone they won. CNN’s error wasn’t reporting that the statement existed. The error was framing it as the definitive Iranian position rather than what it obviously was: domestic propaganda designed to disguise a retreat. Any serious analyst looking at that statement would have immediately recognized it as the regime talking to its own audience, not a real account of what was agreed to. CNN either didn’t see that or didn’t care because the headline was too good. Traditional media can’t distinguish between what a regime says for domestic consumption and what actually happened in the negotiation. This is the noise machine operating as designed. It’s not broken. It’s working perfectly for what it’s built to do. Generate engagement. Drive narratives. Manufacture confusion. The fact that it makes the public less informed about what actually happened tonight is not a bug. Nobody at CNN gets fired for clicks.

More outrageous conduct from CNN. Fake news is bad enough for the country, but pushing out a hoax headline in such a sensitive national security moment as this requires accountability. Iran put out an official statement that simply cannot be squared with the one CNN's false headline attributes to them. Time for change at CNN.

⚡️Iran issued two statements. One real, one for domestic propaganda. The real one accepted the ceasefire and agreed to coordinate Hormuz passage. The propaganda one claimed total victory, said the US accepted all 10 points, agreed to lift sanctions, accepted enrichment, and would withdraw forces. CNN picked up the propaganda statement and ran it as a headline. Trump called it fraud. CNN says they got it from Iranian officials. Both things can be true at the same time. Iran absolutely put that statement out. And it absolutely doesn’t reflect the actual deal terms. It’s the face-saving layer. The dignity makeup. Tehran needs to tell its own people that they won. That’s how regimes survive moments like this. They sign the surrender and then go home and tell everyone they won. CNN’s error wasn’t reporting that the statement existed. The error was framing it as the definitive Iranian position rather than what it obviously was: domestic propaganda designed to disguise a retreat. Any serious analyst looking at that statement would have immediately recognized it as the regime talking to its own audience, not a real account of what was agreed to. CNN either didn’t see that or didn’t care because the headline was too good. Traditional media can’t distinguish between what a regime says for domestic consumption and what actually happened in the negotiation. This is the noise machine operating as designed. It’s not broken. It’s working perfectly for what it’s built to do. Generate engagement. Drive narratives. Manufacture confusion. The fact that it makes the public less informed about what actually happened tonight is not a bug. Nobody at CNN gets fired for clicks.

⚡️Iran issued two statements. One real, one for domestic propaganda. The real one accepted the ceasefire and agreed to coordinate Hormuz passage. The propaganda one claimed total victory, said the US accepted all 10 points, agreed to lift sanctions, accepted enrichment, and would withdraw forces. CNN picked up the propaganda statement and ran it as a headline. Trump called it fraud. CNN says they got it from Iranian officials. Both things can be true at the same time. Iran absolutely put that statement out. And it absolutely doesn’t reflect the actual deal terms. It’s the face-saving layer. The dignity makeup. Tehran needs to tell its own people that they won. That’s how regimes survive moments like this. They sign the surrender and then go home and tell everyone they won. CNN’s error wasn’t reporting that the statement existed. The error was framing it as the definitive Iranian position rather than what it obviously was: domestic propaganda designed to disguise a retreat. Any serious analyst looking at that statement would have immediately recognized it as the regime talking to its own audience, not a real account of what was agreed to. CNN either didn’t see that or didn’t care because the headline was too good. Traditional media can’t distinguish between what a regime says for domestic consumption and what actually happened in the negotiation. This is the noise machine operating as designed. It’s not broken. It’s working perfectly for what it’s built to do. Generate engagement. Drive narratives. Manufacture confusion. The fact that it makes the public less informed about what actually happened tonight is not a bug. Nobody at CNN gets fired for clicks.