Deep Patel

Shower Thoughts Radio© Visual + Motion Identity. behance.net/gallery/201028… Creative Direction & Brand Identity: @typodeep Motion Design: @Sidddiquemotion

AI artists are COOKED. This entire video was made in just a few weeks by a small team of skilled artists for just $20k:

@newincreative yes

Been vibe-coding this project for my AI Design Workshop students. But I'm going to release a free version of this soon. If you're a designer and want access when it drops - just hit a yes in the comments. I'll DM you when it's ready.

typodeep.com is live. New website for my experimental type, brand work, and all the overthinking behind it. Have a look and tell me what you think.

AI Direction @ Fast / Life Contemporary Collection. @alpinestars

Jahan waqt tham jaye, wahi toh sukun hai. #FindYourWorld #Peace #TumAurMain

Velouré - logo concept

🚨 SAMURAI JACK - Teaser Trailer (2026?) Where did this drop from? Unreal Engine? Film deal? Nobody knows. But it looks insane. Jack is back — and it’s cinematic. 🎥 Watch this before it disappears. Comment “TRAILER?” if you want the source to full trailer.

Real G

ESPORTS GRAPHICS VICTORY - ( 2 -1 ) @pprxteam @jasonsusantoo

Thanks to @typodeep , I discovered the Golden Canon grid, a flexible system that adapts to any ratio while preserving visual harmony. Inspired by it, I created a custom grid for my recent project. It’s intentionally disoriented, yet still balanced. -

We need to stop designing with formulas. The golden ratio or any ratio/hack isn’t a shortcut to good design. Using the “right” ratio doesn’t magically make something beautiful or usable. I used to design like this too. Even when something felt off, I’d tell myself it should work because the ratio was right. Looking back, I just didn’t trust my own judgment. There’s no proven formula for beauty. What people find attractive or pleasing changes with culture, context, and experience. If one ratio worked for everyone, everywhere, we wouldn’t still be debating it. Good design works when there’s intent behind it. Sometimes the problem isn’t big. Sometimes it’s simply: this doesn’t look right. When a design doesn’t feel right, a hack won’t save it. You have to ask why—whether the hierarchy is weak, the balance is off, or the structure isn’t clear. Or is the cultural context completely different? Take Japan. A lot of Japanese design is dense, maximal, visually full. By many Western design rules, it shouldn’t work. But it does—because it’s cultural. The intent matches the environment it’s made for. Even things like symmetry and balance don’t work because of math. They work because of evolution. For thousands of years, symmetry meant health and safety. Rotten food looked wrong. Healthy plants looked right. Our brains learned these patterns long before design ratios or systems existed. That’s why certain things feel “right” to us—not because of numbers, but because of survival. So no, there’s no ratio to beauty. Use structure when you need structure. But stop outsourcing taste to formulas. Trust your eye. Trust your intent. Understand the culture you’re designing for. Curious what others think— do ratios help you, or do they limit your judgment?

I'll be designing free email designs for whole week just reply and retweet :D

Here's a series of title cards me & @layout_guy for KR$NA's MV. Will continue this series next year for other artists.

Yes, numbers matters on social media.

Arctype — logo design, by prateek.

First 4 logos which I ruined, what next I should ruin in this series?

Arctype logo transition I worked long ago, will share more version soon.

@layout_guy Really loved the perspective of the logo

Oh, wow, this is how the $ logo looks like. keep it up @AdarshKooll