Tweet épinglé
guler
1.5K posts
guler
@Astro_Guler
Celestial dynamics and space cartography https://t.co/1PmH8pgLbY
(697402) Ao Inscrit le Kasım 2021
206 Abonnements65 Abonnés
This should be correct
guler@Astro_Guler
I added a new page on #COIAS AOMAP so you can see more detailed statistics on the objects given designations by the MPC, and the contribution of different users just like on the COIAS website. Thanks to @icigasu_shine for helping with translations. aomap.nekoweb.org/stats.html
English
@icigasu_shine Oops, I summed some numbers twice in the "All User" statistics. I corrected it.
English
I added a new page on #COIAS AOMAP so you can see more detailed statistics on the objects given designations by the MPC, and the contribution of different users just like on the COIAS website.
Thanks to @icigasu_shine for helping with translations.
aomap.nekoweb.org/stats.html
English
@icigasu_shine You can also click the new button under the time slider, near the search bar.
English
guler retweeté
Introducing over 11,000 new members of the Solar System...and our main survey hasn't quite started yet! ☄️
Using pre-survey observations from 2025, NSF–DOE Rubin Observatory scientists have reported more than 11,000 new asteroids and comets!
🔗: rubinobservatory.org/news/11000-new…
English
@icigasu_shine Once upon a time I asked this very question on the MPML and the collective response I got was "Yes, the clock can be wrong sometimes because of this and that reason, and there was this case where it was wrong back in this year...", but nothing much about what I can do about it.
English
The SARC staff are insisting that we verify whether the time in the FITS header is correct(not about TAIvsUTC or ExpmidvsExpstart)—aren’t they taking this a bit too far? How are we supposed to do that when we have no way of knowing if the observatory’s clock is even accurate?
English
I want to make an animation like this for aomap where minor planets pop up at first their sighting, but frankly I don't know how to figure out the first COIAS observation of an object among all observations.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm…
English
From #COIAS, I just noticed 2015 FF565 (i=175.9 deg) is even more retrograde than 2015 FR561 (i=174.4 deg)! It wasn't on the map before, so this is my first time noticing it.
Of course both objects have very short observation arcs, so I don't know how good these values are...
English
I switched aomap's animation slider to logarithmic scale. Now it should be easier to see TNO movement as well as NEO. But as before, the orbits are computed using 2-body relations, so if you go too far away from the MPC epoch, it might be inaccurate.
aomap.nekoweb.org
English
At least this time the "failed" star isn't in the title, so I will hold back on increasing the failed star counter
Sky & Telescope@SkyandTelescope
Two brown dwarfs are whipping around each other in a tight tango — an unexpected dance for objects that are not-quite-stars and not-quite-planets. Read more: skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news…
English
guler retweeté
昨年にジェイムズ・ウェッブ宇宙望遠鏡による観測から発見された天王星の衛星S/2025 U 1にしれっと確定番号が付与され、正式に天王星の第28衛星となってた。
衛星の確定番号が付与されるのいつぶりだろうか、それなりに久しぶりな気がする。
minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K26/K26FH…
日本語