Magnus Dai

@josuijishinri fih!

glub glub...? #STARSSlumberParty

@ShikiKatagami Sea Scrolls!

Y'all, Paperboat is the cutest option. I like Seashrine and Goldenscroll, but I want a cutieful name!

HERCULES (1997) might have the best opening in Disney history. The Muses immediately take over, the energy never lets up, and “The Gospel Truth” launches the film with more personality than most movies manage in their entire runtime.

#チェンソーマン #chainsawman ⬇️ここをタッチしてください⬇️ ⬇️Please tap here⬇️

Fantasy attire~ Fun to draw but can't repeat again type lol #JosuijiArt

Coraline and the #backrooms

I made a Guitar Hero nails! 🎸

「鎖」 気に入ってるデザイン

@mauthe_doog Whole lotta time + resources since I was a kid

Half the time you'll see some jawdroppingly good horror artist or analog horror short and their description says "17 yr old" What are they feeding these kids

solace

Victorian Backrooms A grieving widow finds a place in her living room...

At the Moulin Rouge: Two women waltzing, by French painter Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1892). National Museum of Prague.

It's a precarious time for the free and open internet. Between age verification, KOSA, NO FAKES, and government stakes in AI companies, we may be looking at the most dramatic federal reshaping of the internet — and how it's allowed to operate — since its creation. Nothing we're seeing in the news looks good for free speech. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are eager to regulate internet content to a degree it has never been regulated before. And you will be required to verify your identity before accessing that content. Unfortunately, public opinion seems stacked against free speech and an open internet. There is not the natural and noisy constituency for freedom that there used to be. Civil libertarians have often had to stand against public opinion to protect freedom. We won with the early internet against great odds. I'm hopeful we will do so here, too. But it may require litigation, as it did in the '90s. As for federal preemption, it can be a good thing if it protects free speech, as Section 230 did. It can also be a bad thing if it requires censorship. We'll see how that shakes out. But we shouldn't trade good preemption in one context for burdensome censorship in another.

@sinaliveatm *Jacked as hell battle-meido who loses his weapon mid-fight, the ops thinking he's defenseless, but he switches to machine gun punches unleashing a volley of fists into the skulls of the poor bastards in his way.*

Battle maid...? #JosuijiArt

Celebrity fashion designer KDaniels, premiered her Michael Jackson inspired collection during Hulu’s “Dress My Tour.” 🔥🔥

よくマイケル・ジャクソンのライブの映像で１９９２年の「Live In ブカレスト」の様子が出てきますね。 そこで登場から２分間動かないマイケルを見て、失神者が続出した…。というのが紹介されるとZ世代の人たちは「へ～何で失神するのかな？大げさじゃない？」みたいな反応のようですが…。 これは、実は深い理由があるのです。 ルーマニア・ブカレストは1989年まで独裁者チャウシェスク大統領が支配する共産国家でした。東欧の中でも特に恐怖政治色が強くて、まさに今の北朝鮮みたいな国だったのです。そこに住む人々は、1982年に世界で1億枚を売った「スリラー」のテープをひそかに密輸して、西側文明の音楽を隠れて聞いていました。 そんな国で革命が起き、独裁者は人民によって処刑されました。そこからわずか3年後、西側文明の象徴であるマイケル・ジャクソンが首都ブカレストに舞い降りたのです。 だから、あのマイケルの登場は単なるスターの登場じゃないんです。「ルーマニアが地獄から解放された」喜びでみんな失神しているんですね。 しかも、あのライブの当時まだブカレストの電力事情は良くありませんでした。なので共産国家が経験したこともないぐらい電力を使いまくるマイケルのライブの為に首都を計画停電して、電力を確保した「リアル・ヤシマ作戦」が行われていたのです。 そりゃ…失神しますよ。