CCHR Int

4.9K posts

CCHR Int banner
CCHR Int

CCHR Int

@CCHRInt

Official CCHR International— Non-profit Mental Health Industry Watchdog that has helped enact 190 laws protecting patients from abuse.

Los Angeles, CA Inscrit le Nisan 2009
111 Abonnements11.5K Abonnés
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Here are interviews with psychiatrists at the American Psychiatric Association in 2006. Now 20 years later they still have no confirmatory tests for any mental disorder, they still play trial and error with drugs and still have no idea if the drugs will "work" or not.
English
5
26
59
1.6K
Jas
Jas@keepontruckin78·
If BC’s Mental Health Act can detain a researcher with no charges and “deem” him to consent to forced drugs, the problem isn’t just one psychiatrist. It’s the law. And it needs to be ripped apart in open court. #SaveNicholasWagter
English
8
20
64
851
CCHR Int retweeté
Dr James Davies (PhD) 💭
The APA has begun to develop deprescribing guidelines (40 years too late) not out of care for patients, but out of fear of power - the government has had enough & this scares them... To bias it, the APA has commissioned the most pharma-compromised Drs in the US to write them...😏
English
15
29
136
5.7K
CCHR Int retweeté
Mary Talley Bowden MD
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD·
.@GSK aggressively marketed Paxil off-label for children from 1998 to 2003 until trials showed it increased risk of suicide in teens. A 2004 lawsuit revealed GSK had actively buried negative safety and efficacy data regarding children while publishing a fraudulent study (written by a ghostwriter) claiming Paxil is safe and effective for teens. This study (Study 329) was never retracted. Full interview with psychiatric RN David Wayne at 4:30pm CT
English
33
279
710
48.9K
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Veteran journalist Douglas Kennedy exposed the links between antidepressants, suicide, and violence as well as the chemical imbalance fraud as far back as 2001 and continued with more than 25 exposes.
English
6
38
69
1.6K
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Few people realize the chemical imbalance theory arose out of the "Decade of the Brain", a U.S. presidential initiative from 1990–1999 aimed at boosting neuroscience research and public awareness. At this time, psychiatry was being heavily criticized for being unscientific with the field questioned for its reliance on subjective symptoms rather than any evidence of physical abnormality that could be verified by test. And so, to bolster its credibility and secure funding, psychiatry began heavily promoting the chemical imbalance theory. There was never any test to prove a chemical imbalance. It was marketing.
Children’s Health Defense@ChildrensHD

💡 Did you know the “chemical imbalance” explanation for antidepressants was never grounded in real science? And psychiatrists have admitted they keep telling their patients this because it makes them more likely to take medication. “The chemical imbalance story was pushed for decades, largely by the drug industry.” “It was never grounded in real science.” “And all of this is spilt out into the media… after numerous big review articles came out saying that there was no link between low serotonin and depression.” “‘In truth, the chemical imbalance notion was always kind of an urban legend… never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.’” “Many psychiatrists say this to patients because it makes them more likely to accept a medication and it moves the visits faster.” “Telling someone that they have a chemical imbalance can be a really quick way to kind of educate them about why they need to take a medication.” “It just smooths over the process.” “It’s essentially a lie.” “It teaches them to think that their suffering is caused by a broken brain and that the solution is a pill.” “And when you try and pretend that it boils down to a single thing that you can fix with a drug, you’re misleading patients.” @DrjosefWD

English
2
19
47
1.6K
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Dr. Thomas Szasz—"You have to have a term in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual [of Mental Disorders] in order to then call it a disease and treat it as a disease and write a prescription for it. When I went to medical school, there were only six or seven items in the manual. Now there are over 300. I mean, you mean to tell me that there have been 294 new diseases discovered in the last 60 years? In psychiatry alone? It's a joke. It's an epidemic of psychiatry that we are dealing with. We don't have an epidemic of mental illness. We have an epidemic of psychiatry. You eat too much, it's a disease. It's an addiction. You smoke too much, it's a disease. You are too unhappy, it's a disease. You're too thin, it's a disease. You're too fat, it's a disease. You have too little sex, it's a disease. You have too much sex, it's a disease. No free will. It's all chemicals. No self-discipline. No self-control. A chemical imbalance meshes very well with the idea that you give a drug which restores the balance. It's a story. A mythology. A fable. Now this is, it’s not just psychiatry, it’s the whole psychiatrization of the culture. Now what’s more toxic, Zoloft or beer? Amen, case closed. Nobody has yet measured, demonstrated, or created a test to show that somebody has a chemical imbalance in their brain. Period. Psychiatrists are getting further and further away from this human-to-human touch. They’re becoming more and more quacks where they talk and act and impersonate doctors... about which they know nothing. Zero. It’s not science, it’s politics and economics. Behavior control. It is not science. It is not medicine. This is so big that it boggles the mind." Dr Thomas Szasz, Professor of Psychiatry
English
2
5
16
470
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Dr. Thomas Szasz, Lifetime fellow of the American Psychiatric Association, "Psychiatrists are getting further and further away from this human to human touch...It's not science. It's politics and economics. Behavior control. It is not science. It is not medicine"
English
6
38
93
1.5K
CCHR Int retweeté
Kim Witczak 💜
Kim Witczak 💜@woodymatters·
Let’s never forget the 1991 FDA advisory committee hearings were on the emergence of violence and suicide with Prozac. It’s time we hold investigations like we did with suicide in mid 2000s. To this day, there are been no federal investigations. Thankfully, Tennessee after the just passed legislation to test for therapeutic levels of psychotropic drugs and other relevant substances in shooters. Great job @ablechild and Amy Miller for tireless dedication.
Kim Witczak 💜 tweet media
A Midwestern Doctor@MidwesternDoc

The violent behavior issue wasn’t discovered decades later after these drugs hit the market. It showed up in clinical trials. Families later uncovered documents during lawsuits indicating the risk was known—and minimized. A 1991 FDA hearing even addressed antidepressant-linked suicide and violence. That was 35 years ago!

English
0
13
34
905
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Precedent setting - The newly passed Tennessee law will test therapeutic levels of psychiatric drugs in cases of mass violence. Results go to University of Tennessee for study, with quarterly reports to state legislators.
Ablechild@ablechild

x.com/i/article/2057…

English
1
12
30
789
CCHR Int
CCHR Int@CCHRInt·
Decades ago this article exposed the Psycho-pharmaceutical playbook. “Disorders Made to Order” shows how Psychiatry + Pharma hyped mental disorders via PR firms, paid psychiatrists & fake patient groups and pushed Paxil/Prozac to drive massive SSRI sales. That’s why millions are on psychiatric drugs today. The same playbook the psycho-pharmaceutical industry is still running. motherjones.com/politics/2002/…
English
2
30
61
1.4K