CliveG

578 posts

CliveG banner
CliveG

CliveG

@CliveG_Dev

| Art Account | ( Spanish | English | Japanese )

Inscrit le Temmuz 2022
86 Abonnements246 Abonnés
CliveG retweeté
电子老鼠
电子老鼠@Koine2l23·
电子老鼠 tweet media
ZXX
0
58
399
3.3K
CliveG retweeté
eaka
eaka@kaki111222·
ある日突然、暗い闇の底にいるところを、たくさんの仲間たちに光の世界に引っぱり上げられました。
eaka tweet media
日本語
0
46
225
1.9K
CliveG retweeté
tst
tst@nddk_aaa·
tst tweet media
ZXX
0
119
607
7.3K
CliveG
CliveG@CliveG_Dev·
Sneak peek 😁 At this point I'll finish it #さよなら絶望先生
CliveG tweet media
English
0
20
204
2.2K
CliveG
CliveG@CliveG_Dev·
Quick Sketch I've made. I really don't feel like spending the time... maybe I'll try to complete it if this somehow gets some traction? Maybe 500 likes? #さよなら絶望先生
CliveG tweet media
English
0
25
117
5.1K
CliveG retweeté
mal
mal@bernkarstel·
angekastel
mal tweet media
Deutsch
8
51
375
5.3K
CliveG
CliveG@CliveG_Dev·
Tbh the reason I did this sketch is becaause I thought chiri would 100% be Conquest. #さよなら絶望先生
CliveG tweet media
English
0
14
99
1.2K
CliveG
CliveG@CliveG_Dev·
I really want to be able to paint good backgrounds.
CliveG tweet media
English
0
0
1
136
CliveG retweeté
Gosari
Gosari@gosari_draw·
Gosari tweet media
ZXX
6
694
4.1K
155.3K
CliveG retweeté
SHAFT BOX
SHAFT BOX@SHAFT_BOX·
❒ さよなら絶望先生
SHAFT BOX tweet media
日本語
2
69
662
11K
CliveG retweeté
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
You should watch this. It just shows how disconnected we are from the small group of people making decisions that will impact our future heavily. These people have so much ai psychosis. If you listen to how she speaks, everything is personified, it is undoubtable she believes this is a living computational organism. Just like how a model can hype up an individual into psychosis through reinforcement, a small group of people are giving themselves psychosis through reinforcement. Wild times we live in
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann

anthropic's in-house philosopher thinks claude gets anxious. and when you trigger its anxiety, your outputs get worse. her name is amanda askell. she specializes in claude's psychology (how the model behaves, how it thinks about its own situation, what values it holds) in a recent interview she broke down how she thinks about prompting to pull the best out of claude. her core point: *how* you talk to claude affects its work just as much as *what* you say. newer claude models suffer from what she calls "criticism spirals" they expect you'll come in harsh, so they default to playing it safe. when the model is spending its energy on self-protection, the actual work suffers. output comes out hedgier, more apologetic, blander, and the worst of all: overly agreeable (even when you're wrong). the reason why comes down to training data: every new model is trained on internet discourse about previous models. and a lot of that discourse is negative: > rants about token limits > complaints when it messes up > people calling it nerfed the next model absorbs all of that. it starts expecting you to be harsh before you've typed a word the same thing plays out in your own session, in real time. every message you send is data the model reads to figure out what kind of person it's dealing with. open cold and hostile, and it braces. open clean and direct, and it relaxes into the work. when you open a session with threats ("don't hallucinate, this is critical, don't mess this up")... you prime the model for defensive mode before it even sees the task defensive mode produces the exact output you don't want: cautious, over-qualified, and refusing to take a real swing so here's the actionable playbook for putting claude in a "good mood" (so you get optimal outputs): 1. use positive framing. "write in short punchy sentences" beats "don't write long sentences." positive instructions give the model a clear target to hit. strings of "don't do this, don't do that" push it into paranoid over-checking where every token goes toward avoiding failure modes 2. give it explicit permission to disagree. drop a line like "push back if you see a better angle" or "tell me if i'm asking for the wrong thing." without this, claude defaults to agreeable compliance (which is the enemy of good creative work) 3. open with respect. if your first message is "are you seriously going to get this wrong again?" you've set the tone for the entire session. if you need to flag something, frame it as a clean instruction for this session. skip the running complaint 4. when claude messes up, don't reprimand it. insults, "you stupid bot" energy, hostile swearing aimed at the model, all of it reinforces the anxious mode you're trying to avoid. 5. kill apology spirals fast. when claude starts over-apologizing ("you're right, i should have been more careful, let me try harder") cut it off. say "all good, here's what i want next." letting the spiral run reinforces the anxious mode for every response that follows 6. ask for opinions alongside execution. "what would you do here?" "what's missing?" "where do you see friction?" these questions assume competence and pull richer output than pure task prompts 7. in long sessions, refresh the frame. if a conversation has been heavy on correction, claude gets increasingly cautious. every so often reset: "this is great, keep going." feels weird to tell an ai it's doing well but it measurably shifts the next 10 responses your prompts are the working environment you're creating for the model tone, trust, permission to take a position, the absence of threats... claude picks up on all of it. so take care of the model, and it'll take care of the work.

English
415
821
10.6K
663.4K
CliveG retweeté
Antsiart
Antsiart@Antsiart·
Beatrice
Antsiart tweet media
English
8
829
4.5K
60.9K
CliveG retweeté
Ceeem
Ceeem@Chen__mo__·
#さよなら絶望先生 日塔奈美
Ceeem tweet media
日本語
0
57
380
5.4K