Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready
10.7K posts

Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté


@AyeeNdeM I worked at NPA years ago, NPA provincial heads are the ones who force their juniors to go ahead to prosecute case that is not winnable. Eveif they advise their seniors to say there is no factual evidence to win the case they still force prosecutors to continue with the case
English

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
JUDICIARY CORRUPTION EXPOSED:
1. The prosecutor must explain why did he return the gun used to commit a crime to the owner without the instructions of the judge?
2. How did the prosecutor know that Adriaan Snyman was going to acquitted ? Before the judgement could be delivered
3. This raises serious questions of very possible collusion between the magistrate and the prosecutor to find Julius Malema guilty by all means necessary!
During the appeal the state must answer these questions and more others! Like how can Julius Malema be convicted of shooting a firearm where his DNA was never found and liked to the firearm in question ?
East London ! KuGompo! EFF , Julius Malema!


English
Combat Ready retweeté

Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté

We stand with you Ngwana ka Koko Sarah asijiki justice must prevail. ❤️🖤💚
#HandsOffCIC
#HandsOffJuliusMalema

Filipino
Combat Ready retweeté

"I sm not dealing with Holy Spirit, i am dealing with @afriforum"
Ladies and Gentlemen, The Man of the Match
Advocate T Ngcikaitobi 🫡

English
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté
Combat Ready retweeté

Our lives are dedicated to the July 26 movement. The dreams, toil, and blood of miners and domestic workers have shaped us into who we are today. Born out of the suffering of the masses, we stand proud as a lasting component of this revolution.@EFFSouthAfrica💚🖤❤️✊🏾

English
Combat Ready retweeté

On Phala-Phala: it is irrational for parliament to establish an independent panel to determine if the president has a case to answer. When this panel says he does have a case, then they subject the same decision to a vote.
It cannot be a matter of vote as to whether someone has a case to answer or not! It is simply a matter based on facts and evidence! Which an independent panel of experts has long established!
The ConCourt MUST rule in favour of the EFF. Ramaphosa must go in front of an impeachment committee, face interrogation on all the Phala-Phala matters.
After his answers, this committee can write a report with recommendations. And only then can an impeachment vote take place.
Simple!
English
















