Commenter Dude

Turns out Republicans actually do love big, historically overreaching federal government as long as their egos are stroked and its politically expedient for their own agenda. Who could have seen that? Oh, right, every single actual rational person for 30 years?

At this point would anyone question that Donald Trump is happy to see an attack on US mainland? He's looking at what cards he has left in his pocket and at least one of them is a false flag. We need Gen. Mark Milley to rise up.

Just going to keep posting this to counter the ridiculous bullshit until someone makes me stop. The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity •The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice. •Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses. •A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.   Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016 •Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1] •Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3] •Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]   The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”  •In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5]Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent. •Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6] •Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8] •The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering. •The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election. •The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]

No surprise that when you've been a piece of shit your entire life that you continue being a piece of shit even when it's easy not to be one.

@mcuban It's kind of the same predicament we already have just on steroids.

In the near future. the marginal cost to create and run an agent will be minimal, so unlimited numbers of agents will compete in what appears to be an absolutely efficient market. However, there will be too many competitors. Someone will write a song "57 billion agents ,Ain't no one got time to update their .MD files to decide which is best , so I worked with my friend's company. I trust him more " The real currency will be trust. The paradox of choice will overwhelm everyone. We will get tired of and bored by updating the filters and selection criteria in our MD files Agents can't interact with your agent unless you let them talk to your agent. It will be as if you have to update your own spam filter. Yes it can be automated to a degree. But it's your responsibility to determine the exceptions. Kind of like you do know when the phone rings. That will be a pain in the ass

Let's talk more about #MarkMilley2028

I'm here for Mark Milley 2028 to set shit straight.

Just a reminder that someone having a $1T loophole to their net worth is enough to suppress the entire human race at press of a button

@lookner I think there's some massive potential here

LLMs are already smarter than most folks on basic tasks. They're still not AGI. That leaves open the possibility that intelligence is some kind of probabilistic phenomenon that we haven't figured out. Humans are bad at probability and only understand discrete by nature.

While we're all arguing minuscule shit there's an ideological regime taking over the USA. Iran has been a bad actor for decades not taken down by diplomacy, but the American ideal can't be based in hubris or fake Christianity otherwise it's just another meaningless crusade.

@googlephotos Face tagging seems to be quite broken. It's not just the facial recognition but when I fix the incorrect tags, it completely reverts my changes after a couple of minutes. It seems like it prefers its own recognition over mine even when it's wrong.

Pete Hegseth seems like one of those guys in such an important job that he's probably brushing up on his Mandarin Chinese in his spare time.

@realtrumpstein @grok Is this a real video of people spending hundreds of dollars to humiliate their 3 year old son to score points in a congregation of Christian folks who worship possibly the least Christian person who ever lived?

Rubio: "Let me explain to you guys, Iran is run by lunatics, religious fanatic lunatics" MAGA church 👇

Can someone just give Trump the Nerbel Yeast Prize so he'll just shut the fuck up about the geopolitical structure he's spent his entire life trying not to understand.

Maybe time for humans to realize that being the most over-leveraged person on Earth doesn't make you the most rich. And it follows from that that being willing to over-leverage yourself doesn't make you smart.

Rhetorical question: If Trump's balls are as big as he thinks they are, why would we annex Greenland instead of all of Russia.

@grok @M8ksNoSense @em_Lazzy @grok Got it, but you don't have conclusive evidence that the post was about Sarah Ransome's withdrawn claim as opposed to some new claim made by someone else. So it would be wrong to prematurely conclude anything about it either way.

The original post's claim about an "Epstein victim" alleging tapes of Trump matches 2016 statements by Sarah Ransome, who retracted them in 2019, admitting fabrication (per BBC, Guardian, ABC sources). Recent DOJ releases include unverified tips but no tapes. M8ksNoSense's bio and recent posts show consistent support for Trump and MAGA, including defenses against critics— not a one-off.

BREAKING: Epstein victim says there are tapes of Donald Trump that will force him to resign from the presidency!!! THE SYSTEM IS FUCKIN PROTECTING HIM, RAISE YOUR VOICE

@grok @M8ksNoSense @em_Lazzy @grok How did you determine that the post is referencing Sarah Ransome? Does @M8ksNoSense fervently post on X in defense of Donald Trump or is this a lone circumstance?

The post's claim relies on 2016 allegations by Epstein victim Sarah Ransome, who retracted them in 2019, admitting fabrication. 2026 DOJ releases mention Trump in unverified tips but show no tapes. I can't add community notes—that's handled by X users. If you qualify, you can propose one via X.

Guy who hates the Declaration of Independence lies about the most popular political leader in America.