Crypto Trader

@propfirmeye @FundedNext Bro he mentioned that there was a violation that happen 4 months ago but it was not flag at that time and got 4 payouts after that and they denied his 5th payout after finding that violation so i think he should be happy that he received 4 payout even he did violate rule

I've exposed @FundedNext multiple times. I've spoken with many traders whose accounts were falsely terminated by FundedNext. Now here's a Live Example. This trader second Payout was rejected by FundedNext. Previously, his Payout was also rejected. But when he shared all the Proof publicly and the tweet went Viral, they eventually Paid him. Now the same thing is happening again. On his dashboard, it shows $1,048 deducted for "Rule Violation". But during this Payout cycle, he never made a trade with $1,048 Profit. This clearly indicates that FundedNext is using False Accusations to reject trader's Payouts.

@astucefx @FundedNext Maybe I’m missing something, but if the rule was broken in December and you still received 4 payouts after that, and the 5th payout got denied, then technically you already benefited from it. In that case you should probably be happy you got those payouts rather than complain

Second payout denied by @fundednext this year. This time my dashboard shows $1,048 deducted for “rule violation”, but during this payout cycle I never made any trade with $1,048 profit. My only winning trade was $11,318, so where did the $1,048 deduction come from? And as usual, no clear explanation about the rule I supposedly violated… I have to contact ethics just to find out. 😑

In case you think my issue has been fully solved it isn’t for same reason my payout denied because they calculated my margin wrongly with 200k instead of 280k, i got enrolled into the discipline program with plenty restrictions for the same reason which should have been lifted, im still yet to confirm if that decision has been revert so far no reply

This is why the trading community matters. Any payout rejection without clear evidence or rule violation should be publicly questioned. Accountability is non-negotiable.

So FUNDEDNEXT denied @astucefx’s $4,500 payout, gave no rule violation, then approved it only after the post went viral? 🤔 If you can’t clearly say which rule was broken, payout rejection = shady behavior. Most traders don’t have a voice — that’s the real problem. @FundedNext

🦈 UPDATE: Glassnode says wallets holding 100–1,000 $BTC added 54,000 $BTC (~$4.66B) this week, the fastest accumulation pace since 2012.

Bought a bag of $LTC here. Looks heavily undervalued vs other majors and it barely moved against $BTC. It has no tech? In crypto, price drives the narrative, not other way around. $SOL at $8 was “useless” Then they suddenly found “the tech” and it became “future of finance.” When $PUMP was dumping, everyone also thought it was a piece of shit, even though there were already buybacks. Then after it pumped - everyone started calling it the “future of finance” because “there are buybacks!” (same buybacks as at 3x lower fdv) Ethereum at $1,500 was literally being compared to Nokia and sentenced to go to $0 - people said the tech was dead. Then when it was already $3k - they suddenly “found the tech” and started calling it the “future of finance” - but the tech was exactly the same. And Litecoin doesn’t pump this whole cycle exactly because everyone thinks there are no “tech” and that it’s just a “memecoin”. I think with Litecoin, as another dino coin, they’ll soon “discover the tech” My prediction is something like: insanely low FDV, fair distribution, all coins already on the market, cheap transactions - everything BTC has, just even better.

MASSIVE POLITICAL NEWS COMING FOR BITCOIN TUESDAY THAT WILL RESHAPE THE TRAJECTORY OF BITCOIN POLITICS. THIS WILL BE A DEFINING MOMENT. 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 $88 BILLION COINBASE CEO JUST SAID #BITCOIN AND CRYPTO MARKET STRUCTURE BILL IS ABOUT TO PASS “I’VE NEVER BEEN MORE BULLISH” 🚀

🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID #BITCOIN "TAKES A LOT OF PRESSURE OFF THE DOLLAR." IT IS “MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANYTHING WE INVESTED IN.” 🔥

🚨 Donald Trump Jr. has invested in a Litecoin and Dogecoin mining company. Keep an eye on the Scrypt mining space.

For years, Litecoin has been hiding in plain sight. Running since 2011 with no downtime. But the story got buried - overshadowed by Bitcoin’s and Ethereum’s narrative dominance. Meanwhile, Wall Street took over. BlackRock has Bitcoin. Strategy is now an institutional PR machine. The suits moved in. The rules changed. Litecoin didn’t. It stayed fast. Cheap. Still owned by the people. And now it has a ticker. $MEIP

According to the latest @CoinGatecom report ⤵️ Litecoin is the only major coin with uninterrupted gains in payment share from 2023-2025. From 9.5% - up to 13.6%. It. Just. Works.

MEI Pharma became the first public US company to adopt a Litecoin Treasury Strategy. 929,548 $LTC were acquired for ~$100M at ~$107.58 per token. Thanks to the involvement of @SatoshiLite & @GSR_io, we're bringing the people's currency to institutional portfolios. $MEIP

🚨$397B ASSET MANAGER BETS ON LITECOIN Billion-dollar asset manager Citadel is the top backer of MEIP’s Litecoin Treasury Fund — securing 18.1% of the initial $100M LTC purchase via Citadel CEMF Investments Ltd. Is $LTC a quiet altcoin giant? 🔥

🚨Just In🚨 Per MEI Pharma (MEIP) 8k filing with the SEC today, the company has acquired 929,548 Litecoin at an average price of $107.58 to hold as a treasury! The company has the option to purchase up to another $100mil worth in the near future. 👀 sec.gov/Archives/edgar…

JUST IN: $15.5 Billion in Transaction Volume moved on the Litecoin Network. $LTC Transaction Volume Outpaces $USDT, and Now Rivaling the Ethereum Network. $ETH sits at a $453.7 Billion Marketcap. Litecoin’s Marketcap is Currently $8.67 Billion.

$100 million was just the beginning.. HIGHERRR

JUST IN: $12.75 Billion in Transaction Volume was Processed Yesterday on the Litecoin Network. That’s $2.4 Billion more than Tron’s USDT & $10.6 Billion more that Ripple’s XRP Litecoin currently sits at a $9 Billion Marketcap