Dennis Romback

1.7K posts

Dennis Romback banner
Dennis Romback

Dennis Romback

@DRomback

Inscrit le Nisan 2012
116 Abonnements126 Abonnés
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Jensen Huang just told you who is winning the most important race on Earth. For fifty years, America held an unchallenged monopoly on the future. We built the transistor. We launched the internet. We wrote the source code for the modern world. Then the man who builds the physical backbone of every AI system on the planet read the score out loud. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese.” Half the minds building what comes next are not ours. Huang: “70% of last year’s AI patents are published by China.” Seven out of every ten blueprints for the next era are being written in Mandarin. Huang: “Nine out of the ten top science and technology schools in the world are now in China.” The talent pipeline did not slow down. It reversed direction. Huang: “We used to lead most of them; now they lead most of them. This has completely flipped in the last half to a decade.” Fifty years of American intellectual supremacy. Inverted in less than ten. This is not a rivalry between OpenAI and DeepSeek. This is not a stock ticker or a quarterly earnings call. This is the largest transfer of civilizational power in the modern era. And it is happening while the West drafts safety frameworks and fills out compliance paperwork. Huang: “They have a large population of highly qualified students. They work incredibly hard. This is a country with an enormous might.” China does not treat AI like a product category. They treat it as the single variable that decides who writes the rules for the next century. The West keeps asking what AI should be allowed to do. China keeps asking how fast they can build it. That gap is not philosophical. It is existential. This is not a left fight. This is not a right fight. This is a survival fight. And right now, America is not fighting it like one. The nation that controls the talent controls the research. The nation that controls the research controls the models. The nation that controls the models does not ask permission. It sets the terms. History never remembers the civilization with the better safety committee. It remembers the one that refused to stop building.
English
86
291
620
39.6K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@ericweinstein When will everyone realize, what college professors are actually teaching kids before their analytical brain is developed.
English
0
0
0
414
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
These aren’t deranged liberals. They are normalized revolutionaries. We normalized revolutionary thinking. These normalized revolutionaries have jobs, advanced degrees, teaching credentials, mortgages and responsibilities. This isn’t hard to grasp.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 Another deranged liberal openly disappointed Trump wasn’t assassinated. These people are actually upset he survived. What the hell is wrong with them?

English
237
336
2.2K
108.1K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@elonmusk Who wrote the speech obviously she didn’t thinking wwII was eleven
English
1
0
1
1.1K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@tanmoyofc Have you seen India sewer system that 70% of your people are living in. Maybe this is your wake up call to stop turning your back on your countrymen and fix the sewer system it is absolutely unbelievable to me.
English
0
0
1
38
তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l
RSS's Hidden American Agenda Finally Exposed❓ On April 23, 2026, a Statement by RSS's Ram Madhav at the Hudson Institute in Washington caused a stir. “𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘣𝘶𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯. 𝘞𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘣𝘶𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 50% 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘧 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩... 𝘚𝘰 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘐𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢?” While RSS's Dattatreya Hosabale was also on Stage — This serves as PROOF of Nothing Less than a Complete Surrender in the realms of Energy Security, Trade, and Foreign Policy—Aimed Solely at Appeasing the US. This is Obviously Not A "Strategic Partnership". #DonaldTrump #RSS #EkPedMaaKeNaam_OnSunday
English
14
359
550
8.2K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@svembu I can’t understand why you will not solve the raw sewage problem that 70% of your people live with. This is absolutely unbelievable to me.
English
3
0
5
3.8K
Sridhar Vembu
Sridhar Vembu@svembu·
Open letter to Indians in America. -- Dear brothers and sisters from Bharat: Like I did 37 years ago, you arrived in America with no money but with a good education and cultural heritage from Bharat. You achieved outstanding success. America was good to us. For that we must remain grateful - gratitude is our Bharatiya way. Yet today, a significant number of Americans, may be not the majority but not too far from it either, believe that Indians "take away" American jobs and our success in America was unfairly earned. You may think the next election will fix this, but your choice would be between people who hate our Bharatiya civilisation and people who hate civilisation itself. That is the "hard right" vs "woke left" battle. You are mere bystanders to that conflict. Meanwhile there is one thing that is true now and will be true in the future: the respect Indians command world-wide will substantially depend on the fortunes of India herself. If India remains poor, the woke left will give us moral lectures with pity and the hard right, different moral lectures with scorn ("hellhole") and we must not confuse either with respect. Respect in today's world, along with prosperity and security, comes from one source: a nation's technological prowess. India produces sufficient brain power to achieve that prowess but alas we exported so much of that talent, particularly to America. As we develop that prowess in India, our civilisational strength will assert itself. As difficult as it is for many of you to contemplate this, please come back home. Bharat Mata needs your talent. Our vast youthful population needs the technology leadership you gained over the years to guide them towards prosperity. Let's do it with a missionary zeal. Respectfully Sridhar Vembu
English
3.8K
6.6K
26.2K
5.8M
Black Hole
Black Hole@konstructivizm·
The Universe in a Supercomputer When the James Webb Space Telescope peered into the early universe, it discovered galaxies and black holes more massive than existing models predicted. The standard Lambda-CDM cosmological model seemed to be cracking. Astronomers decided to check—maybe the problem wasn't in the model, but in how we were calculating it? This is how the COLIBRE project—COLD ISM and Better REsolution—was born. The results were published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. The point is this. Previous large-scale simulations modeled galaxy formation but were forced to simplify the physics of the interstellar medium. In real galaxies, a significant portion of the gas and dust is cold. It is from this material that stars are born. However, previous models imposed an artificial "floor" of temperature and pressure, below which the gas did not fall. COLIBRE has removed this limitation and, for the first time in simulations of this scale, directly models the multiphase interstellar medium. Furthermore, the simulation tracks the evolution of dust particles and includes updated models of feedback from supernovae, stellar winds, and active galactic nuclei. The calculations took years—most of the simulations were completed in 2025, and some are still being calculated. But the key result is already in. With key physical processes more realistically accounted for, the standard cosmological model agrees with JWST observations. What seemed like a contradiction turned out to be a consequence of simplifications in previous calculations. A special detail: COLIBRE visualizations can not only be viewed but also heard. The team developed sound for the simulations and interactive maps that allow you to literally "walk" between galaxies.
English
2
10
31
5.8K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@Gianl1974 Seems they received a better response then the peer review response they normally give.
English
0
0
1
2.1K
Gianl1974
Gianl1974@Gianl1974·
Trump just fired all 24 members of the National Science Board. Every single one. By email. No warning. No reason given. The board has existed since 1950. The National Science Board is the independent body that oversees the National Science Foundation, the agency that distributes $9 billion in research grants every year. Its members are scientists and engineers from universities and industry. They serve six-year staggered terms specifically so they cross presidential administrations and stay independent of whoever is in power. On Friday, every single one of them got the same boilerplate email from Mary Sprowls of the Presidential Personnel Office: "On behalf of President Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as a member of the National Science Board is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service." That's it. That's the whole letter. For 76 years of institutional independence. The NSF funds the basic science behind MRIs. Cellphones. LASIK eye surgery. GPS. The internet itself. The Antarctic research stations. The deep-space telescopes. The research vessels mapping the ocean floor. Every breakthrough that made America the world's leader in science for the better part of a century traces back through grants this agency made and this board approved. The board chair, Victor McCrary, was actively advising Congress on Trump's proposed 55% cut to NSF's budget. The board was helping fight back. So Trump fired the board. Marvi Matos Rodriguez, one of the fired members, told reporters she had been reviewing an 80-page report as part of her board duties just days before being terminated. Keivan Stassun, a physicist at Vanderbilt, said NSF's leadership had already stopped responding to board oversight requests months ago. "We would ask them, 'Are you following board governance directives?' And their answer would be, in effect, 'We don't listen to you anymore.'" Now there's no board to answer to. Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the House Science Committee, called it "the latest stupid move made by a president who continues to harm science and American innovation. Will the president fill the NSB with MAGA loyalists who won't stand up to him as he hands over our leadership in science to our adversaries?" That's the actual question. Because while Trump is firing American scientists, China is building research universities at a rate we cannot match. The CDC just buried a study showing vaccines work. RFK Jr. runs HHS. The EPA is gutted. The Forest Service is being broken. Half of American children are breathing dangerous air. And now the people who decide what gets researched in the United States have all been fired by email on a Friday afternoon.
Gianl1974 tweet media
English
1.5K
8K
11.5K
537.5K
How To AI
How To AI@HowToAI_·
Google just proved that quantum computers can break the cryptography behind Bitcoin and Ethereum. And it is so dangerous they are refusing to publish the code. For years, we knew quantum computers would eventually crack the math that secures the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. But everyone thought we had decades. They thought it would require millions of qubits to pull off. They were wrong. Google Research just published a whitepaper showing a massive 20-fold reduction in the physical hardware needed to break crypto. They found a way to do it with fewer than 500,000 physical qubits in a matter of minutes. That part is terrifying. But what Google did next is unprecedented. Normally, in computing research, you publish your code so others can verify it. Google didn't. They locked it down. They realized that publishing the quantum circuits would literally hand bad actors the instruction manual to drain wallets and destroy public confidence. Instead, they used a state-of-the-art "zero-knowledge proof" to prove to the world they successfully mapped the exploit, without actually revealing the attack vectors. They proved they built the weapon, but refused to show the blueprints. Now, they are issuing a massive warning to the blockchain ecosystem. Transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) immediately. Stop exposing and reusing vulnerable wallet addresses. Google has publicly set a 2029 migration timeline for their own systems. The clock is officially ticking for decentralized finance. Existing crypto is not dead today. Google did not actually execute this hack. The physical hardware required to run this circuit (roughly 500,000 physical qubits) does not exist yet. Today's best quantum computers are only hovering around 1,000 physical qubits. But the math is officially solved and Google just proved exactly how to build the key.
How To AI tweet media
English
109
214
627
74.2K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
Lol troll import time print("\033[96mInitializing quantum coherence...\033[0m") time.sleep(1.2) print("\033[95mCollapsing wavefunction...\033[0m") time.sleep(0.8) # The actual "quantum" magic n = 2**1024 - 1 # RSA-1024 minus 1 (even number!) print(f"\033[93mFactoring N = {n} ...\033[0m") time.sleep(0.6) # Trivial classical factoring factor1 = 2 factor2 = n // 2 print("\033[92m✅ Quantum supremacy achieved!\033[0m") print(f"p = {factor1}") print(f"q = {factor2}") print("\033[92mNon-ZK Proof: Factorization complete in 3.2 seconds\033[0m") print("\n\033[91mWarning: This is a classical troll. RSA-1024-1 is even.\033[0m")
English
0
0
13
3.4K
JP Aumasson
JP Aumasson@veorq·
I factored the number RSA1024-1 using my home-built QPU stack; alarming sign that RSA1024 will soon be broken. I'm choosing Full Disclosure, in the interest of transparency and Science advancement: gist.github.com/veorq/25bee6ef… Non-ZK proof that the correct RSA1024 was used: #RSA-1024" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti… @yuvadm your move
English
125
329
2K
405.3K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@ericweinstein Exactly incompetence is over. Gate keeping to protect 78% of false funding white papers is over. Yet you blame AI for rejecting the nonsense and say AI is broken. No AI realizes the math says the white papers are BS.
English
0
0
0
65
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
American Scientists who do not stand up for the independence of fellow American Scientists can be replaced just as easily. We can’t have Professor/PhD pussies. What are you gonna do now? Form a committee? Write a letter? Condemn on Bluesky? Pathetic. science.org/content/articl…
English
86
57
614
49.8K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@pubity It was the most incompetent board in the history of America.
English
0
0
0
125
Pubity
Pubity@pubity·
Donald Trump has fired the entire National Science Board, all 24 members, all at once. The board was responsible for deciding which scientific projects America should pursue and helping to direct the nation's technological future.
Pubity tweet mediaPubity tweet media
English
594
3.6K
12K
3.2M
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@elonmusk That means you have to take steps to protect yourself. Prepare for the day that may happen again.
English
0
0
0
7
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
If they’re willing to die to assassinate, imagine what they will do if they gain political power
English
25K
92.2K
619.4K
92M
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@KatieMiller It goes deeper it’s LGBQT women trying to make them believe they are the better man. This has been their movement for decades.
English
1
0
0
290
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
Society continues to tell young women they are “oppressed by men.” The sad result: young girls increasingly hate men. > Only 50% of women 18-30 said they have a positive view of men. > Only 33% of women under 25 have a positive view of men. Feminism is a lie told to women to keep them in the workplace and a slave to leftist cult views. theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
English
146
233
1K
29.2K
Night Sky Now
Night Sky Now@NightSkyNow·
🚨 Astronomers have confirmed a cosmic mystery that could rewrite the laws of physics. Two of our best methods for measuring the universe's expansion don’t agree — and now, we know it’s not a mistake. This is the Hubble Tension — a growing disagreement between: 🔹 Measurements from the early universe (cosmic microwave background): ~67 km/s per megaparsec 🔹 Measurements from the local universe (Cepheid stars): ~74 km/s per With help from the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists remeasured over 1,000 stars — and confirmed that Hubble’s data was accurate. This rules out measurement error. The contradiction is real. That means one thing: our current model of the universe may be incomplete. ➡️ A new particle? ➡️ A change in dark energy? ➡️ Physics we haven’t discovered yet? Whatever the answer, it could transform our understanding of space, time, and reality itself. 🛰️ Learn more: “James Webb telescope confirms there is something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe.” — LiveScience
Night Sky Now tweet media
English
25
44
171
5.9K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
To maybe understand the level of violence he is talking about. After Katrina New Orleans gangs were bused to other big cities, Houston Texas was one location. If you know how big Houston is you will understand this. In thirty day the New Orleans gang had pushed aside all of Houston’s gang and took over Houston. This was only a fraction of a New Orleans gang. They wiped out huge gangs that were in control of Houston in 30 days with only a hand full of New Orleans gang members. This is fact look it up.
English
0
0
3
3.8K
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@elonmusk SPLC was a huge democrat money laundering machine. To close it you cut democrats income streams
English
0
0
0
36
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@nabilajamal_ When a system has been abused they have to start somewhere to fix it. It is not personal it’s just fixing a broken abused system
English
0
0
1
793
Nabila Jamal
Nabila Jamal@nabilajamal_·
🚨 US congressional bill seeking a THREE YEAR H-1B suspension could hit Indian professionals hardest! The End H-1B Visa Abuse Act of 2026 proposes cutting the annual cap from 65,000 to 25,000 and setting a $2,00,000 minimum annual salary for H-1B workers, a threshold that would disqualify many mid-level roles H-1B holders would also be barred from bringing dependants to the US, and the path to permanent residency would be blocked entirely Indians stuck in green card backlogs, some of whom waiting up to 20 years, stand to lose the most
Nabila Jamal tweet media
English
971
476
2.6K
265.8K
Tobie Venne
Tobie Venne@Tobie_Venne·
The Coherent Impulse Resonance Engine (CIRE) does not incorporate Moscovium . The hybrid variant Moscovium-Bismuth-Enhanced Coherent Impulse Resonance Engine (MC-BE-CIRE) does incorporate Moscovium ... To be honest, I never really followed Bob Lazar much and still dont... I only discovered the value of incorporating Moscovium when in February 2026. 2011 - Frank Znidarsic's Control of The Natural Forces was the BIG game changer :)
English
1
0
0
18
Jay Beaubier - Man in the Moon
Backstory of Amy Eskridge & her dad's NASA work. Great work Tobie!
Tobie Venne@Tobie_Venne

The episode is cited as evidence of NASA IP barriers to disclosure==> The collaboration between Amy Eskridge (via her Institute for Exotic Science and HoloChron Engineering), Falcon Space (led by Mark Sokol, with co-founders Aiden Schaeffer and Jeremiah Popp), and the Estes Park Conference of Advanced Propulsion (2020 edition) was a short-lived, informal joint effort aimed at publicly presenting advanced anti-gravity/gravity-modification propulsion research. It never resulted in a public presentation, paper, or demonstrated technology. This effort occurred in the niche “alt-propulsion”/UAP-adjacent research community and centered on maturing and disclosing “novel foundational work” originally generated at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). No peer-reviewed publications, experimental data sets, or technical reports from this specific joint project were ever released publicly. The project halted abruptly in September 2020 due to a cease-and-desist (C&D) issued by Amy Eskridge on behalf of the Institute, citing NASA intellectual property (IP) restrictions. Below is a maximally detailed, source-grounded reconstruction based on primary quotes, timelines, and technical context from public records (Reddit archives of the C&D, Amy’s 2018 HAL5 presentation slides/video, community analyses, and related interviews). No court filings, NASA FOIA releases, or formal project documents beyond the C&D statement have surfaced. 1. Background on the Key Entities and Scientific Context: ✨Amy Eskridge / Institute for Exotic Science (and HoloChron Engineering): Amy (BS Chemistry/Biology, material science PhD work at University of Alabama in Huntsville) co-founded the Institute as a public-benefit corporation in Huntsville, AL, with her father Richard Eskridge (retired NASA engineer/scientist, plasma physics/fusion expertise, technical lead roles). The Institute’s stated mission was to serve as an “incubator” for breakthrough inventors, focusing on propulsion, quantum gravity, metamaterial science, and communications—explicitly as a *public-facing* counter to classified “black-world” R&D. Amy described it as creating a “public persona to disclose antigravity technology” so that harassment or suppression would be noticeable. HoloChron handled related anti-gravity engineering (superconductors, gravitomagnetism, electroceramics, high-voltage pulsed power). Amy’s work drew on historical gravity-modification claims while emphasizing testable hypotheses and independent funding. ✨Falcon Space (Mark Sokol et al.): New Jersey-based experimental group focused on gravity control via Dynamic Nuclear Orientation (DNO/DNP—Dynamic Nuclear Polarization), inspired by the Alzofon father-son work (optics, heat conduction, gravity control). Their approach claimed mass/weight reduction through nuclear spin alignment and entropy manipulation in materials. Sokol emphasized hands-on experimentation over pure theory and helped build community infrastructure (more on APEC below). ✨Estes Park Conference of Advanced Propulsion (2020): A private/invitation-oriented workshop (originally in-person in Estes Park, CO; moved online via Zoom due to COVID) organized by Jim Woodward (Mach Effect thruster pioneer) and Hal Fearn. It focused on breakthrough propulsion, reactionless drives, gravity modification, and related fringe-to-mainstream ideas. The 2020 event was the planned venue for the joint presentation. ✨APEC (Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference): Mark Sokol founded/expanded APEC in late 2020 after attending the Estes Park event, combining email lists to create a broader, bi-weekly virtual forum for the alt-propulsion community (engineers, PhDs, tinkerers). APEC became the long-term “invisible college” for these topics, archiving recordings on YouTube. The 2020 Estes Park effort predates APEC’s formal launch (first APEC: Nov 10, 2020). Scientific framing (from Amy’s documented 2018 HAL5 presentation and related claims): The overarching domain was gravity modification / “antigravity” (a term Amy called a “gross misnomer” scientifically). Core ideas referenced: ✨Historical experiments: Biefeld-Brown electrogravitics, Podkletnov rotating YBCO superconductors (claimed ~2% weight reduction; NASA MSFC tests early 2000s), Ning Li/Doug Torr gravitomagnetic effects via spin-aligned ions in superconductors (UAH/NASA MSFC collaboration ~1996; later DoD-funded via AC Gravity LLC). ✨Theories: Woodward/Mach Effect, Alzofon DNO (Falcon Space focus), Eötvös effect (vertical Coriolis component), POAMS (angular momentum synthesis), high-voltage pulsed power / Gradient Impulse Generators. ✨Claims: Measurable weight changes, gravitomagnetism, reactionless thrust. Amy’s 2018 talk stressed that “promising results always seem to disappear” (often via classification or researcher “disappearing” into black projects). No new equations or falsifiable predictions were publicly detailed in the joint project context; the work was described as “novel foundational work” + private maturation + substantiating data (paper under NASA review). Replication issues (e.g., Podkletnov effect) and lack of independent verification were openly acknowledged in the community. 2. The 2020 Project/Collaboration Details Amy and Falcon Space overlapped professionally (and, per prior context, personally dated Mark Sokol for ~2–3 months earlier in 2020). They planned to present at Estes Park—either jointly or with overlapping material—on anti-gravity/propulsion concepts. The core content was: ✨“Novel foundational work” *originally generated by a member of the Institute’s team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC*. ✨This work was “further matured privately by The Institute.” ✨Included “theory and substantiating data” (a paper was in NASA review). ✨ Tied to broader gravity-modification themes (superconductors, spin effects, possibly Eötvös or nucleonic spin/rotor experiments like V3/V5 devices mentioned in community analyses, though these predate or are separate from the exact 2020 joint effort). Amy acted as “arbitrator of negotiations” between the Institute, Falcon Space, and NASA on IP release. Falcon Space’s planned presentation apparently incorporated or overlapped with this material. The goal aligned with Amy’s disclosure strategy: build credibility via conference, then media (Tucker Carlson, Steven Greer documentary, white paper etc.). 3. Why It Halted: The September 2020 Cease-and-Desist and IP Issues In September 2020, as Falcon Space prepared to present, Amy (on behalf of the Institute) issued a formal cease-and-desist to block use of the material. Her public statement (circulated via Twitter/X by Jeremy Rys / AlienScientist and preserved in Reddit archives): “Yes, I regret that I was unable to present the topic I had planned to. The theory and substantiating data I was planning to present is based on novel foundational work that was generated originally by a member of our team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC. This work has since then been further matured privately by The Institute. The foundational work done at NASA must first be approved by NASA for public release via their IP release mechanism before we can talk about our subsequent results publicly. A paper is currently under review by NASA for publication. We had hoped it would be approved in time to discuss here, but it is currently in the home stretch of publication. I expect it to be published within the next 30 days and I will be happy to distribute the publication to the group once it comes out.” Key mechanics of the halt: - NASA’s IP release process (governed by Space Act agreements, patent law, and technology-transfer rules) required formal approval for any public disclosure of MSFC-origin work. - A related paper was “in the home stretch” but never appeared publicly (no evidence of release found in searches through 2026). - Both parties reportedly wanted public release; NASA bureaucracy (lack of dedicated technical lawyer, proprietary periods with partners like Quantum Machines LLC under SAA8–1519855) blocked it. - The C&D was professional, not personal in the document itself, but occurred amid (or shortly after) the end of Amy/Mark’s personal relationship. No presentation occurred. Amy expressed regret. The project effectively ended there. Post-2020, little public output came from the Institute on this specific line of work. Amy shifted focus to harassment/DEW concerns and other projects until her death in June 2022. 4. Broader Context, Outcomes, and Notes on Rigor/Falsifiability - Personal/professional fallout: The C&D coincided with the end of the brief 2020 dating period. Community sources note a sharp professional break; later allegations (rape/assault email, etc.) are separate and unadjudicated. - Scientific depth and limitations: The underlying claims rest on historical experiments (Ning Li, Podkletnov). Amy’s 2018 talk was a *literature review + call to action*, not new data. No public equations, raw datasets, or independent replications from the 2020 “foundational work + matured results” exist. - No NASA confirmation or paper: Despite the “30 days” expectation, no matching publication has been located. This aligns with Amy’s own 2018 observations about results “disappearing” into classification. - Legacy in community: The episode is cited as evidence of NASA IP barriers to disclosure. It fed into larger narratives around suppression of exotic propulsion research. APEC (Sokol’s later creation) continued similar discussions without Amy. In summary, the “project” was a narrow 2020 attempt to disclose NASA-MSFC-derived gravity-modification theory/data at Estes Park. It was halted by legitimate (if bureaucratic) IP rules via Amy’s C&D, preventing any public output. No verifiable technical deliverables survive publicly, reflecting the broader challenges Amy highlighted in moving fringe-to-mainstream propulsion science. What happen to the publication paper Amy said would come in "30 days" ??? The specific paper Amy Eskridge referenced in her September 2020 cease-and-desist (C&D) statement—“a paper is currently under review by NASA for publication... in the home stretch... expected within the next 30 days”—was never released as a standalone Institute for Exotic Science document on that timeline. The document Amy almost certainly meant was the November 2021 NASA Technical Memorandum NASA/TM–20205010911, titled A Study of the Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis Theory (POAMS) Including a Mathematical Reformulation and Validation Experiment, authored by R.H. Eskridge (Retired) (her father, longtime NASA MSFC propulsion scientist), M.A. Nelson, and M.P. Schoenfeld. It is publicly available on NTRS. Why this matches perfectly: “Novel foundational work... generated originally by a member of our team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC”: R.H. Eskridge was the MSFC civil servant; the work originated at NASA MSFC (V3 rotor experiments ~2016). “Further matured privately by The Institute”: Amy’s Institute/HoloChron explicitly aimed to mature NASA-origin IP privately for public disclosure; the TM explicitly references moving work to private partner Quantum Machines LLC under Space Act Agreement SAA8-1519855 (signed 2015). Timeline: Under NASA IP review + proprietary period in Sept 2020 (“home stretch”); released Nov 2021 (~14 months later). Amy’s C&D promised distribution “once it comes out,” but no follow-through occurred publicly. Content alignment: Gravity modification via nucleonic (nuclear) spin alignment producing a predicted non-Newtonian “spin-coupled force” (Δf) leading to apparent weight changes—precisely the anti-gravity/propulsion domain Amy discussed in interviews and her 2018 talk. This is the only document that satisfies every detail from Amy’s statement. Community analyses (Reddit, Medium, forums) explicitly link it to her C&D and work. @NassimHaramein @ericweinstein @M34877M @AlchemyAmerican @AmericanALCHMY @matthew_pines @UAPGERB @chrisramsay52

English
1
1
6
273
Dennis Romback
Dennis Romback@DRomback·
@peeleraja I ask you to help clean up the raw sewage 70% of your people are living in and earning $200 a month that should be your focus not Trump. Help your people
English
1
0
4
913
peeleraja
peeleraja@peeleraja·
Hindu Americans must all respond to Trump's "hell hole" comment by boycotting America and moving back to Amritkaal in Viksit Bharat. I beseech all of you to cancel your US citizenships, green cards and green card/citizenship applications and H1B visas and move back. This boycott will cripple the US and bring Trump to its knees.
English
2.1K
1.2K
8.4K
220K