TheVSNGuy
1.2K posts

TheVSNGuy
@EmotionsFreaky
Vision Chain. Real Utility. No hype. Just crypto.

Ich wette gegen die Prognose des Microsoft AI CEO. Prognosen sind schön und lustig, aber man sollte die Komplexität von Dingen nicht unterschätzen. Technologische Visionäre unterschätzen systematisch den "letzten Kilometer". 90% eines Problems sind oft schnell gelöst, aber die restlichen 10% erweisen sich als exponentiell schwieriger. Beispiele: 1️⃣ Bill Gates (2004): "Spam wird in zwei Jahren der Vergangenheit angehören." Realität 20 Jahre später: Spam macht fast 50% des Traffics aus. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technolog… 2️⃣ Elon Musk (2015): "Vollständige Autonomie in ungefähr zwei Jahren." Wir warten 2026 immer noch darauf. electrek.co/2015/12/21/tes…

. @FkleinwieGross from @Bitpanda_global Web3 and @vsntoken came on DROPS to explain what how Bitpanda Web3 and Vision are building the « Blockchain of Europe » Out soon on DROPS!


There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.


In a strange turn of events, shitting on @waleswoosh is what put @vsntoken on my radar. It started with a singular DM from the team that turned into a conversation. That conversation turned into a deeper look at what they’re actually building. When a certain *rove project decided to swap out their overused fiverr logo, I took that as a sign from the universe that this partnership was meant to happen. So here we are. To quote w4le5woo5h: "Super excited to announce my new partnership with Vision." I’ll be sharing more about RWAs, tokenisation, and how Europe is moving onchain, explained simply without the fluff.

Super excited to announce my new partnership with Vision. Like Coinbase in the US, Vision aims to become Europe’s tokenisation engine, by building the infrastructure layer on which regulated finance goes onchain in Europe. Vision is backed by Bitpanda, the largest European crypto platform, and has also expanded to different digital (and traditional) assets. Millions of active users and fully regulated in Europe as one of the few exchanges or trading platforms. Together with @vsntoken, I will bring to you a new monthly series on RWAs and tokenization and more insights into their ecosystem. Stay tuned







Looking ahead to 2026, one thing is clear... We will keep building, shipping and expanding no matter the market cycle. $VSN is focused on what comes next, not what is trending today. #VSNSZN




