Felix Handte

30 posts

Felix Handte

Felix Handte

@FelixHandte

Software Engineer working on compression @facebook. Cinematographer at https://t.co/6PVX8mjMkF.

New York, NY Inscrit le Aralık 2008
34 Abonnements22 Abonnés
Felix Handte retweeté
Yann Collet
Yann Collet@Cyan4973·
We are open-sourcing OpenZL, a new data compression library and training tools to generator specialized compressors for structured data, achieving performance levels inaccessible to classic generic algorithms: github.com/facebook/openzl
English
31
209
1.6K
140K
Felix Handte retweeté
Terror Films
Terror Films@Terror_Films·
Can't cram in a movie on your busy schedule?? Settle in for an unsettling 45 minutes with CRAM! 😈 #CRAM is available today on @Tubi and more! TUBI: bit.ly/3sjnYwV
Terror Films tweet media
English
0
3
6
712
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@absidell @coopercooperco E.g., the fix for this would be to slide the bottom left control point of the green channel curve to the right a bit.
English
1
0
2
55
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@absidell @coopercooperco In response, my first adjustment in Lightroom is now always to adjust the channel scales myself to fix these mismatch errors, by manipulating the endpoints of the channel curves.
English
1
0
1
42
F♯A♯∞, fka ☕️
F♯A♯∞, fka ☕️@coopercooperco·
got some ektachrome back that has some shots with a green tint in the shadows that I’ve never experienced before. Is this from underexposure or what? It’s present seemingly at random and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a roll of my ektachrome do this. It shouldn’t be expired.
F♯A♯∞, fka ☕️ tweet mediaF♯A♯∞, fka ☕️ tweet mediaF♯A♯∞, fka ☕️ tweet mediaF♯A♯∞, fka ☕️ tweet media
English
10
2
102
15.8K
Felix Handte retweeté
Abie Sidell
Abie Sidell@absidell·
Wow if I had grades like this in school CRAM wouldn't exist
Abie Sidell tweet media
English
1
2
24
623
Felix Handte retweeté
Abie Sidell
Abie Sidell@absidell·
With 10 DAYS left to study like your life depends on it before CRAM drops on-demand & streaming, I’m excited to share more rad behind-the-scenes highlights🤘 And there’s nobody radder than one of the original Rad Rhinos himself: @felixhandte 🦏 — CRAM’s cinematographer! 🧵
English
2
2
5
869
TDC
TDC@dhueuskndskjsm·
@danluu The hard part here was done by Jarosław Duda who created ANS.
English
2
0
3
0
Felix Handte retweeté
Dan Luu
Dan Luu@danluu·
I wonder how much waste has been eliminated by Yann Collect creating zstd. When I ran the numbers at Twitter, which is tiny compared to the huge tech companies, switching to HDFS to zstd was ~ mid 8 figs/yr. Across the world (not annualized), it seems like must be >= 9 figs?
English
9
57
465
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@mattroll_ Don't worry, C's got you covered: statically allocate all your memory.
English
0
0
0
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@mattroll_ There is no god but the one true god, whose name is ISO C.
English
0
0
1
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@steveyedlin Man, I’m sorry. I’m really trying to resist going further down the m.xkcd.com/386 rabbit-hole. But I think it comes down to this: I’m talking about cd/m^2 and you’re talking about lm/m^2. Energy (lm) = intensity (cd) * area (aperture).
English
0
0
0
0
Steve Yedlin
Steve Yedlin@steveyedlin·
@FelixHandte (No, it’s not a different thing. It’s exactly the same thing. The total energy over the whole surface area is the sum of the energies in all the subdivisions that you choose to break the the whole area into — whether those areas are photosite-size or not.)
English
1
0
0
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@steveyedlin (Obviously the total energy incident on the film plane changes, but that's a different thing...)
English
2
0
0
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@steveyedlin Is it that intensity (cd/m^2) matches between the object and the image? Or that total flux (lm/m^2) matches between the object and the image? Or something else?
English
0
0
0
0
Felix Handte
Felix Handte@FelixHandte·
@steveyedlin Fair. I tried! But it's not clear to me what the fundamental conclusion you're reaching is. Apparently, the statement I thought you were arguing for is one we both don't agree with. So what is true of shooting at t/1.0 that you're saying isn't true of other apertures?
English
2
0
0
0