fideus.faruumvth
3.1K posts

fideus.faruumvth
@FideusF
Biomass with awareness
The Factory Inscrit le Ağustos 2020
1.1K Abonnements150 Abonnés
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté

Is this why we have an uninterrupted lineage of Popes since Saint Peter and why our Basilicas and Cathedrals are built on the bones of Christ’s Apostles?
I’m going to correct your misgivings by pointing out that to the (Roman) Catholicity of the Early Church and Saint Peter (and Paul’s) Roman Residency.
(1) Catholicity of the Early Church
(A) Saint Polycarp of Smyrna
For, having through patience overcome the unjust governor, and thus acquired the crown of immortality, he now, with the apostles and all the righteous [in heaven], rejoicingly glorifies God, even the Father, and blesses our Lord Jesus Christ, the Savior of our souls, the Governor of our bodies, and the Shepherd of the Catholic Church throughout the world. (Martyrdom of Polycarp A.D. 156)
(B) Saint Justin Martyr
For the men of former generations, who instituted private and public rites in honor of such as were more powerful, caused forgetfulness of the Catholic Faith to take possession of their posterity… (On the Sole Government of God).
(C) Saint Iranaeus of Lyon
But [the superior skill spoken of] is not found in this, that any one should, beyond the Creator and Framer [of the world], conceive of the Enthymesis of an erring Æon, their mother and his, and should thus proceed to such a pitch of blasphemy; nor does it consist in this, that he should again falsely imagine, as being above this [fancied being], a Pleroma at one time supposed to contain thirty, and at another time an innumerable tribe of Æons, as these teachers who are destitute of truly divine wisdom maintain; while the Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world, as we have already said. (Against Heresies A.D. 180).
(D) Saint Clement of Alexandria
Therefore in substance and idea, in origin, in pre-eminence, we say that the ancient and Catholic Church is alone, collecting as it does into the unity of the one faith—which results from the peculiar Testaments, or rather the one Testament in different times by the will of the one God, through one Lord—those already ordained, whom God predestinated, knowing before the foundation of the world that they would be righteous. (The Stromata).
(E) Caius the Presbyter
And John too, indeed, in the Apocalypse, although he writes only to seven churches, yet addresses all. He wrote, besides these, one to Philemon, and one to Titus, and two to Timothy, in simple personal affection and love indeed; but yet these are hallowed in the esteem of the Catholic Church, and in the regulation of ecclesiastical discipline. There are also in circulation one to the Laodiceans, and another to the Alexandrians, forged under the name of Paul, and addressed against the heresy of Marcion; and there are also several others which cannot be received into the Catholic Church, for it is not suitable for gall to be mingled with honey. (Fragments).
(F) Pope Saint Cornelius (A.D. 253)
There was one voice from all, giving thanks to God; all were expressing the joy of their heart by tears, embracing them as if they had this day been set free from the penalty of the dungeon. And to quote their very own words —“We,” they say, “know that [Pope] Cornelius is bishop of the most holy Catholic Church elected by Almighty God, and by Christ our Lord. We confess our error; we have suffered imposture; we were deceived by captious perfidy and loquacity. For although we seemed, as it were, to have held a kind of communion with a man who was a schismatic and a heretic, yet our mind was always sincere in the Church. For we are not ignorant that there is one God; that there is one Christ the Lord whom we have confessed, and one Holy Spirit; and that in the Catholic Church there ought to be one bishop.” (Letter 45: To Saint Cyprian).




English
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté

@Only763475 @ktrader07 @IslamMumin30 @muslimorthodoxy “Authentic Hadiths”
lol.
Theres not a single sahih or even “good” hadith of the prophet ﷺ doing either of these things, the texts you mentioned have major defects in the chain of narration which makes it totally unreliable and weak.
English

fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté

@ms_3_u @IslamMumin30 @LAldyn43792 @Acts17David @muslimorthodoxy Hi Ms_3_
1) they are sahih, so you can stop lying
2) Academics don't take the Islamic propaganda of hadith chains seriously at all, they treat them as made-up fictions to protect Islam from criticism for political purposes.
So you can take lying p3do ass out of here. Cheers


English

@FideusF @IslamMumin30 @LAldyn43792 @Acts17David @muslimorthodoxy Hi fideus, not a single Hadith of these are sahih or even good, all of them has serious defects in the chain of narration and in the متن (text).
English
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté

King Charles won't give an address for Easter, but he'll give one for an Islamic holiday
The UK has fallen.
GB Politics@GBPolitcs
🚨BREAKING: Buckingham Palace has confirmed King Charles will not issue an Easter message this year
English
fideus.faruumvth retweeté


@WhiptonDash @swamthetiber25 You don't even believe Christ was crucified, unlike all the earliest christian, jewish and roman sources.
You aren't part of the conversation, & your belief is crazy ahistorical.
More akin to scientology/mormonism. Following a p3do is instantly disqualifying intellectually.
English

@swamthetiber25 You touched one of most important theological problems -
Glad you are pointing this out - we, Muslims have been saying this for a long time.
English

I abhor reformed theology more than just about anything else on Earth.
Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) is problematic because it can imply a division within the Trinity, portraying the Father as punishing the Son rather than acting in perfect unity of will and love. It frames forgiveness as dependent on satisfying divine wrath through violence instead of as a free act of mercy, and can suggest God is bound by an external standard above Himself of retributive justice. It also raises coherence issues, such as how Christ’s finite suffering could satisfy an eternal penalty, and moral concerns about punishing the innocent when guilt cannot be transferred. Biblically and historically, PSA is difficult find as well.
𝕄𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕪@yesiwetmyplants
Either Christ bore your punishment, or you will. When Jesus hung on the cross, it wasn’t an example of just love only, it was substitution. He was wounded for transgressions that weren’t His. He was crushed for sins He never committed. That’s why the cross matters. If Jesus didn’t actually take the wrath you deserve for your sins, then that wrath still stands against you. God’s justice doesn’t disappear. Sin must be punished. The only question is, was it punished in Christ, or will it be punished in you?
English
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté
fideus.faruumvth retweeté

When the Lord Jesus Christ instituted the Holy Supper, He inaugurated the New Covenant. As divine revelation makes clear, such a thing can only be done through a blood sacrifice.
Here's the issue.
A covenant had already been made in Moses with the blood of Oxen, some collected in basins and the rest he sprinkled on the altar and then on the people themselves: "This is the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made" (Exodus 24:8). And this covenant established a priesthood according to the order of Aaron with the tribe of Levi.
Every Israelite could throw down the text of the Law to try and invalidate what Jesus was doing at that Table.
However, as St. Paul says to the Hebrews, the Law itself predicted the expiration (via fulfillment) of the Aaronic priesthood to make way for a new priesthood that was to come according to a different order, that of King Melchizedek, the High-Priest of God most High, who brought bread and wine out to Abraham (Gen. 14:18). He had no genetic origin or progeny (according to the text), and thus his biography served as a reflection of a priesthood who had no origin or end (i.e., timeless).
At the Last Supper, Christ, knowing His eternal priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek would be, in time, instituted by Himself and His Apostles (who would also become ministers of the same priesthood), took bread and wine and consecrated it by making it His body and blood, thereby capturing the Melchizedekian form while also converging His very own self into the victim of offering.
Effectively, the New Covenant Priesthood, according to the order of Melchizedek (via bread and wine), is now the only valid priesthood.
To learn more about the biblical and historical basis of this, see the following:

English























