Commentary:Hamlin

The #Blockstreet $BLOCK is lead by @eyezenhour and @Kylechasse These are the people who have been in the space a long time and are incredibly humble and trustworthy. Look at their track records. Speaks for themselves. @BlockStreetXYZ

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

@vuuuuuu0 Not yet

@HamlinWeb3 The token Rugged . . .

Blockstreet will drive the next phase of USD1's growth.

🚨 MARKETS ARE THREADING A NEEDLE The S&P 500 just broke 7,000 for the first time. Gold is near $4,800, up over 25% since 2025. Bitcoin is fighting for $75K, a key level for continuation or reversal. At the same time: The Federal Reserve remains on hold. Inflation is still running above 3%. Henry Paulson is warning the US may need a contingency plan for Treasuries before the debt wall hits. Geopolitics is carrying part of this rally. Optimism around Iran talks is doing heavy lifting. If that fades, risk assets may follow. One constructive signal: The CLARITY Act is down to just a few unresolved points. A workable crypto framework is getting closer. TLDR Everything is rallying, but the underlying tensions remain unresolved.

We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵

This is the part that actually moves the needle. Laws create permission. Banking access creates participation. Without this piece, everything else was just paperwork that serious builders would quietly work around anyway. Pakistan just made it harder to ignore. Lets build!

@Mommytalkss SpaceX.

Gm CT? What could it be? any guesses?

America needs Clarity.

@Kylechasse Come visit us in the #Blockstreet discord.

@Kylechasse Totally ready. The Clarity Act is a done deal behind the scenes. Bullish mode activated. 🚀 @BlockStreetXYZ

With everything going on, the markets will have a field day this week. It's not a bad idea to get ready for some SERIOUS volatility. Are you ready?

@BlockStreetXYZ @worldlibertyfi

Here are the changes in BLOCK's holder addresses and holdings between Dec 7, 2025 and today. The structure is very healthy.

@BlockStreetXYZ @worldlibertyfi

The last administration drove away the digital asset industry. It’s time to welcome them home with clear rules of the road. Pass the Clarity Act.

Most crypto regulation debates break at the same point: Stablecoins start to look too much like bank deposits That seems to be where the CLARITY compromise was found @Coinbase and @brian_armstrong were pushing back hard on language that would restrict stablecoin yield and rewards. Their point was obvious. If digital dollars cannot offer any economic incentive, adoption slows and users move elsewhere Then a few days later, Coinbase received conditional OCC approval for a national trust bank charter @krakenfx was the first to secure this just weeks earlier That timing is hard to ignore... It does not prove a trade happened behind closed doors. But it does look like the usual Washington outcome: One side accepts the constraint, the other gets a cleaner lane, and the bill starts moving again GENIUS was the foundation That bill gave Washington a way to legitimize stablecoins without letting them become direct competitors to the banking system > 1:1 reserves > Issuer standards > Par redemption > Necessary disclosure requirements And most importantly, a line around passive yield Stablecoins could become regulated payment infrastructure but they were not going to become yield-bearing shadow deposits The fight was always about yield - Banks wanted the firewall - Crypto wanted to preserve incentives - Both want all the benefits stablecoins offer The compromise now looks narrow but workable: no passive yield for simply holding stablecoins, but some activity-based rewards tied to payments or platform usage may survive That is why the Coinbase sequence matters Banks kept the deposit protection they wanted. Coinbase got a stronger regulatory position in custody, payments, and stablecoin infrastructure CLARITY regained momentum and now we are days or weeks away from it passing Bottom line ⤵️ If the bill passes in something close to this form, the early advantage likely goes to firms already positioned for regulated custody, stablecoin infrastructure, and institutional distribution The market focus should be less on “clarity” as a headline and more on which balance sheets are positioned to benefit from the framework first

If you hold $BLOCK here's what you'll get: > governance over platform upgrades and fee structures > revenue share from platform fees distributed to stakers Not just another governance token with zero utility

@WLFI_MSTR @Xipzz19 @clazn0x 个人感觉，解锁时间会安排在26.9.1，相当于一年的悬崖期后开始分批解锁。在这之前会有一波拉升。稳住。我们能赢。

@Xipzz19 @clazn0x 我在监督团队修正错误

Why did $WLFI remove the team photos on March 20? On March 20, I noticed the team members’ photos were taken down, so I asked someone from the team about it. It’s true that, as of today, I don’t have an official answer. But I do have a theory that’s worth discussing: What if it has everything to do with the CLARITY Act? The CLARITY Act requires strict disclosure of individuals involved in digital asset projects. That includes background checks, trading restrictions for insiders, and disclosure of their transactions. Before formally defining who is officially part of the $WLFI team… does it make sense to clean up the website? I’m not worried. In fact, it seems like a sign they’re moving carefully from a legal standpoint. But I think it’s important to keep in mind that this doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad thing 🦅☝️

We did the math. Plume is ~3000 times more compliant than the average blockchain ecosystem. Here's what using the same compliance tools as the world's largest banks and financial firms means in practice for the safety of your assets. 👇

Let's talk about the FUD going around our WLFI Markets lending position. It's wrong. Here's what's actually happening — and why the real story is a lot more interesting.