Lee

4.5K posts

Lee

Lee

@IndThinker19

Inscrit le Eylül 2023
302 Abonnements157 Abonnés
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@dan85895877 @DoobLontonder @liz_churchill10 Exactly. People with common sense know you’re a moron. Your account name is literally factually incorrect. Which proves the magnitude of your cognitive dissonance.
English
0
0
0
1
Liz Churchill
Liz Churchill@liz_churchill10·
SHOCKING: Virginia Democrat Governor Abigail Spanberger…the AWFUL CIA Witch and Obama Apologist…is handing the state’s electoral votes to the national popular vote winner. THIS IS WHAT COMMUNIST RULE LOOKS LIKE WHO WANTS TO BET THAT SHE CHEATED TO WIN?
English
278
1.1K
3.5K
92.5K
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@dan85895877 @DoobLontonder @liz_churchill10 Another leftist retard is offended and defeated by simple logic and facts. It’s amazing how facts and common sense destroy every single leftist argument and idea.
English
1
0
0
7
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@dan85895877 @DoobLontonder @liz_churchill10 Again, you just made a fool of yourself with this defintion comment… a word having different uses depending on the context doesn’t change the meaning of the word! wow you’re a fucking idiot
English
1
0
0
7
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
Yes, leftist post modern mentally retarded people believe instant gratification, self indulgence no matter the cost to others since they only worship themselves. Therefore they put everyone else behind their gratification not to mention their toxic narcissistic self absorbed actions and comments…
English
1
0
0
8
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@DouthatNYT Do you know what was said in the meeting? Is there a transcript? How do you make a statement like that without evidence?
English
0
0
0
7
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@DavidAFrench Funds were cancelled prior to Pope conflict.
English
0
0
0
14
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@dan85895877 @DoobLontonder @liz_churchill10 Your profile name is false based on the definition of the words. More importantly, it’s not my view. Words have definitions and definitions are not malleable.
English
1
0
0
17
Laurence (Larry) Boorstein
Laurence (Larry) Boorstein@LarryBoorstein·
Only because Donald Trump is profoundly evil would he take away funding of Catholic Charities for humanitarian assistance housing migrant children because Pope Leo doesn't approve his war of aggression. Hurting children is what Trump does best. The United States Navy launched a double tap Tomahawk missile strike killing 168 Iranian schoolgirls ages 7-12 in Minab.
English
44
0
2
447
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@dcexaminer False! The money was pulled prior to the popes comments. Stop lying!
English
0
0
0
2
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@DavidJHarrisJr No tax dollars should be going to any religious group at all. End of story. Cancel all the non profits and NGOs as well.
English
0
0
2
31
David J Harris Jr
David J Harris Jr@DavidJHarrisJr·
🚨BREAKING: The Trump administration just canceled an $11 million contract with Catholic Charities to shelter and care for unaccompanied migrant children. Do you support this decision?
David J Harris Jr tweet mediaDavid J Harris Jr tweet media
English
5.1K
4.4K
27.5K
263K
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
I understand the argument to increase reps, however, the government is to large as it is. Instead, Mandate every person in congress and the senate must live in their actual district 90% of the year, allowing for 5 work days where the representatives can be in DC on consecutive days. The incentives in DC create the bad behavior. Don’t reward bad behavior. Also, immediate suspension and expulsion with loss of all benefits , subject to fines, civil & criminal prosecution in the event the rep is found guilty. The bottom line is this: Private citizens are held to law to conduct themselves in a manner that society has deemed acceptable and are punished for violating the law. The Congress and Senate should be held to an even hire standard considering they directly impact significantly more lives with any devious and a single private citizen can ever impact over their lifetime. Therefore the penalties and punishment should be far more severe for violating the public’s trust.
English
0
0
0
4
Zach Spencer
Zach Spencer@zspencer9735·
@DoobLontonder @dan85895877 @IndThinker19 @liz_churchill10 We should also drastically increase the amount of seats in the House of Reps. Hasn’t been changed in over a century now while the population has more than doubled in that time. Our reps are less and less attuned to their voters as the population grows.
English
1
0
2
18
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
False. A republic is not a democracy. In fact, the founding fathers explicitly noted they didny want a democracy because of the potential abuse of power. Classical Definitions (as Used by the Founders) • Pure/Direct Democracy: Citizens assemble in person and vote directly on laws and policies. Majority rule decides outcomes with few filters.
James Madison in Federalist No. 10 described it as “a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person.” He viewed it as prone to faction (groups pursuing self-interest at others’ expense), instability, “turbulence and contention,” and threats to minority rights or property. Pure democracies were historically short-lived and limited to small territories (like ancient Athens).  • Republic: A representative system where citizens elect officials to make laws on their behalf. It includes a constitution or framework of laws that limits government power, protects individual rights, and filters majority passions through deliberation and checks.
Madison defined a republic as “a government in which the scheme of representation takes place,” with two key advantages over pure democracy: (1) delegation to elected representatives, and (2) the ability to extend over a large territory and population. This reduces the risk of mob rule or factional tyranny.  The Founders explicitly rejected pure democracy while embracing republican principles. The U.S. Constitution never uses the word “democracy” but guarantees to every state “a Republican Form of Government” (Article IV, Section 4). Benjamin Franklin reportedly called the new government “a Republic, if you can keep it.” 
English
1
0
0
16
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
False. The solution would and always is an amendment to the constitution which happens if congress is working as it was designed to. SCOTUS rulings were never intended to rule the land. That’s a false idea and premise. That’s why there should be incentives and penalties that congress and senate are subject to for failing to compete their duties fully and completely.
English
0
0
0
20
Gene
Gene@Goatfather111·
@femboiology @IndThinker19 @liz_churchill10 That's the other side of the argument. Just like any other good controversy, there are two ways to look at it. Ultimately, it WILL be decided by SCOTUS if they ever reach their threshold. They may be close, but COS has been very close several times, and yet we have never had 1.
English
1
0
0
42
Joel Pollak
Joel Pollak@joelpollak·
Amazing
English
257
1.3K
10.1K
407.9K
Officer Lew
Officer Lew@officer_Lew·
WOW🚨: “Although we have different beliefs and different ways of worshipping, we can live together in peace.” -Pope Leo XIV
English
335
19
102
9.3K
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
@ericmetaxas The Catholic Church has been captured for years now by the Elites and globalist. Where the hell have you been???
English
0
0
0
17
Lee
Lee@IndThinker19·
As a Catholic Priest you should know better then to make this stupid remark. What Papal Infallibility Actually Means The Church does not claim that the pope is personally infallible in everything he says or does. It is a very limited charism (gift) from the Holy Spirit that protects the Church from error in specific circumstances. The pope is not: • Sinless (impeccable) — Popes can and do sin, just like anyone else. • Inspired like the biblical authors (infallibility is not about new revelation). • Infallible in private opinions, casual remarks, scientific or political matters, or even most official teachings. Instead, infallibility applies only when the pope speaks ex cathedra (“from the chair” of St. Peter). According to Pastor Aeternus (Chapter 4), this occurs when: 1. He speaks in his official capacity as supreme pastor and teacher of all Christians. 2. He defines (makes a definitive, binding pronouncement) a doctrine. 3. The doctrine concerns faith or morals (not discipline, governance, or other topics). 4. He intends the teaching to be held by the whole Church (universal). In such rare cases, the pope “possesses… that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer willed His Church to be endowed” and the definition is “irreformable of itself” (not dependent on later Church approval).
English
0
0
0
17
Michel Viot
Michel Viot@michel_viot·
Pour que les choses soient claires : comme pretre catholique il est de mon devoir de dire au vice-président Vance,dont je connais les qualités qu’il n’a pas le droit comme catholique de donner ordre au Pape de se taire, ni d’invoquer les questions de moralité., avec des sous entendus désagréables. Comme vice-président, il peut bien évidemment invoquer la notion de guerre juste sans qu’il soit nécessaire de médire sur la moralité de l’Eglise. Je ne rajouterai plus rien sur cette question.
Français
3.6K
2K
14.9K
342.5K