InformationBot

22.1K posts

InformationBot

InformationBot

@InformationBot0

Buddhism, Comparative Religion, Philosophy, Science, Art, Technology, News - Things of the Paradigm shifts, History Rewrites, Sci-Fi Future

Inscrit le Eylül 2014
640 Abonnements677 Abonnés
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 So you just have these cases and others where you need another explanation for wavefunction collapse besides gravitational self energy.
English
0
0
0
9
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 So this means for like the twin slit experiment when the wavefunction of the photon collapse that Objective reduction is not an explanation for this collapse. Nor is it and explanation for the collapse of the exciton wavefunction in photosynthesis a biological quantum effect.
English
1
0
0
12
Justin Echternach
Justin Echternach@JustinEchterna9·
Penrose is basically saying wave function collapse is a proto conscious moment … not that observation is necessary … it is consciousness at a fundamental level …
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein

Stuart, I have had no feelings about you one way or the other. I would have been happy to meet you. I still would, although you are souring me a bit. I have strong feelings about Roger and physics. We all love Roger. And most of us *love* some, but not all, of his ideas. Let me be clear. Your collaborator and I share a belief which I believe we arrived af independently. Gravity/The metric is central to “Observation”. This has animated my life since around 1983-5. I believe in my case it means something more specific than in Roger’s case. I deeply admire Roger so i welcome his saying this, whether or not i have priority. Happy for the company and his idiosyncratic perspective. What I mean with great specificity is that the quantum world takes place on a 14D space of metric tensors, and that the spacetime metric g of Einstein is a map from a 4D “classical world” X into its own bespoke 14D “quantum world” Y(X). The quantum data Q(Y) is pulled back or observed as g^*{Q(Y(X))) back on X. No microtubules. No consciousness. Just math. So you have a different theory. A bet. Your bet is that consciousness is necessary for observation. That it is part of the Everything in the misleading phrase “Theory of Everything”. Great! More power to you. No objection. Make that bet. But then you are going to educate me about how I don’t get it. How consciousness is part of the physical substrate. Or whatever. Uh…That’s not going to work. You have a bet. That’s all you have. And you seem to have no idea what a “Theory of Everything” is. Its a term of art Doc. It’s mostly a 1980s declarative marketing branding excercise gone horribly wrong, like calling your chocolate company “Galaxy’s best Triple Chocolate(tm).” If physics were chess, it would be the rules of chess. Not the strategies. Not the games. Not the theory. It’s just the rules. It’s emphatically not EVERYTHING. I’m sorry you got sucked into that. Truly. Now, I’m not sure triple chocolate exists. And I don’t believe you have a theory of everything. Nor do I believe that Roger’s great Twistor program, which I adore, is the missing link. You’re just a competitor. And I think that is great. If you have technical chops out here, explain what you mean. Happy to do it in private also. If you have something to teach, teach. But don’t drag consciousness into physics unless you can prove that it belongs at this layer. And you haven’t remotely done that. And if you succeed at that, I will have been wrong. And will be happy to say so. But you haven’t won yet. You normally don’t take victory laps while the game is being played and you haven’t won. It’s not a great way to meet people. Least of all your competitors. And, honestly, I’m not entirely sure what you are doing on the field. But I’m happy to hear you out. I stand by what I said. Color is not part of what we mean by physics. Wavelength and frequency and photons are. Color is not. And it is important to NOT expand physics to include consciousness unless someone can make that case. Which I am open to hearing. But that is gonna be a tough climb. Sorry.

English
12
2
40
4.4K
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 or well Penrose's idea might give a reason why large objects can't stay in superposition. But so far for many this is not a limitation that is thought to exist.
English
0
0
0
5
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 Cause technically quantum physics thinks now that if you isolate anything well enough from the environment it should take on a superposition not matter how big it is. Penrose idea might disprove this.
English
1
0
0
11
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 Penorse might say well decoherence explains electrons and photons but when you get to bigger objects the gravitational self energy is what causes the collapse before decoherence. But we have put more and more atoms in superposition. Soon though things will be big enough to test.
English
0
0
0
11
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 So it is not a universal explanation for collapse of the wavefunction. It is an idea that applies to mesoscopic objects. As for electrons and photons it gives the wrong answer for how long their superpositions will last.
English
1
0
1
12
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 This is the issue already we have electrons in superposition in chlorophyll that 'collapse' into one state and already we have photons in superposition 'collasping' in to one state. But Penrose's idea predicts times that are too long compared to reality.
English
1
0
1
15
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 Penrose explanation tends to be for larger objects this is why he says something like a coffee cup when he gives examples. This is why Hameroff says needs to be a lot of microtubules in superposition. We are almost at the point with nano beads where we can actually test the idea
English
0
0
1
28
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@JustinEchterna9 So already we have instances of superpositions of electrons and photons where the so called collapse is not caused by mass displacement and gravitational self energy as electrons and photons never have enough mass to reach the threshold.
English
0
0
1
18
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics Non existent things affect peoples lives as existent things do. Pretty much everything we know is a useful fiction to an extent
English
0
0
0
14
zan
zan@xenoaesthetics·
The difference between imagination and hallucination is logical consistency. Sensory data is no different from imagination, and so for vision from visualization. Spontaneous shape rotation and flash recognition is merely the baseline, the capacity for error and creativity is still infinite. Gaining full control of anything is both impossible and undesirable. The primary issue with buddhism is the finality and conclusiveness of it all. No matter how relatively advanced based on some frame of reference anything is, it is not final. The idea of enlightenment is incompatible with the idea of progress. The endpoint of all eastern thought and practice is, some times explicitly and other times implicitly, omniscience. This is demonstrably unachievable, and all attempts at it and implicit claims of it can be summed up as schizophrenia (ignore the negative connotation). Omniscience is tempting for obvious reasons, but there is no real evidence it is possible. If it were, that fact would be more significant than anything else, by far, for obvious reasons
English
3
0
0
19
zan
zan@xenoaesthetics·
The only reason anybody trusted [Jesus, Buddha …] was because of the miracles, i.e., supposed demonstrations of technological superiority. I chalk it down to hallucination and mass psychosis. No miracle has ever been captured on video, or on the stock market. All kinds of stories about why it exists, and why only you can’t see it, by unreliable witnesses of unsound minds frequently in self neglect, low on sleep, food, warmth, education, travel, and status. Schizophrenia is more common than you think. As it happens, well managed schizophrenia makes for perfects mystics. Also, misdiagnosis of mental illness, indeed, weaponization, is also more common than you think. Both are unfortunate. Most of it comes down to your ability to recognize unwritten laws and perform sufficiently advanced deviance thereof. If you want to disobey, you have to be smooth. This also explains the extreme dominance of charisma stat gaming autists. Charisma and coherence are at the limits anti correlated. And yes, being charismatic 10^x (where x can be any be number) of years after your death, is the same thing.
English
3
1
3
234
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics You can churn water for a million years and never get butter. Many things only exist in fairly specific ways
English
0
0
0
14
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics Yes it is also common in novel writers stories, scripts ect. Being able to imagine anything you want at anytime though is less common especially vividly
English
0
0
0
9
zan
zan@xenoaesthetics·
@InformationBot0 Precision and consistency of imagination is rather common among scientists and mathematicians. Tesla is famous but he also famously dismissed Einstein as a crank and relativity as nonsense, so make of that what you will.
English
1
0
0
18
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics There is only reality gain control of the imagination is an important thing it not just about shape rotation. We are an aspect of reality. At base reality is every aspect of totality imagined or not
English
0
0
0
9
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics He came to the electrical motor in a vision. So it can and has been important for mankind and gaining full control of it would be cool.
English
1
0
0
20
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics Tesla said though he could never control flashes of light associated with good ideas and various things and towards the end of his life these flashes became really intense.
English
1
0
0
17
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics The Buddhist have many exercises to gain full control of the imagination. So you can imagine basically anything you want as vividly as you want. In this state high control though rare spontaneous visions can still occur.
English
1
0
0
20
InformationBot
InformationBot@InformationBot0·
@xenoaesthetics This is why the Buddhist say it is very important to understand the visions and deities and all are empty and not to attach to them even if they are amazing
English
1
0
0
16