Juno.eth

Hiện có 1 người trải nghiệm app sàn #SCEX đã thắc mắc như sau: Lãi 400k, Thuế mất 40k trên sàn Việt Nam – Anh em thấy có hợp lý?😳 Anh chàng này test giao dịch 20 SSOL trên sàn SCEX và nhận ra: Lệnh mua không tính thuế, nhưng lệnh bán lại bị thu thuế🙂‍↕️ ​=> Lợi nhuận: ~400.000 VNĐ ​=> Thuế khấu trừ: ~40.000 VNĐ (tương đương 10% lợi nhuận hoặc lệnh bán) ​Nhiều người đang thắc mắc: Thuế này đang đánh trên lợi nhuận thực tế hay tổng giá trị lệnh bán? Nếu tính trên tổng giá trị, những ai lướt sóng biên độ mỏng sẽ rất đau và thốn ví =))) ​Anh em nào đang test sàn SCEX vào check xem có phải mọi người đang hiểu sai cách tính không nhé😁

The strongest consumer apps rarely begin with technology. They begin with a behavior people already wish they had. That's why I keep thinking about @Sleepagotchi through the lens of product design instead of token design. Sleep isn't a competitive activity. Nobody wins because they stayed awake longer or pushed harder. The product has to reward restraint, consistency, and recovery—three things that don't naturally fit crypto's usual incentive loops. That creates a very different challenge from STEPN. With movement, users can consciously increase effort to chase higher returns. With sleep, there is a biological ceiling. Better rewards don't automatically produce better sleep, which limits farming behavior by design. Ironically, that limitation may be one of the product's advantages. Consumer crypto has spent years trying to manufacture habits with financial incentives. Most of those habits disappear when emissions decline because the behavior never had value outside the reward. Sleep already has intrinsic value. The incentive simply lowers the activation energy for building the routine. Whether that routine survives is another question. Retention won't depend on APYs or point campaigns forever. It'll depend on whether users start checking their sleep because they care about feeling better tomorrow, not because they expect another payout tonight. That's also why the investor profile matters more than headline numbers. Consumer wellness products require patience with gradual behavioral change rather than immediate financial activity. For me, the interesting metric isn't daily active wallets. It's the percentage of users who quietly keep opening the app months later—even after the rewards become ordinary. That's when a crypto product stops renting attention and starts earning a place in someone's life.

TermMaxFi @TermMaxFi treats capital as networked, but influence as earned. That may be the smartest part of its referral design. Join through someone’s link, deploy capital, trade, then post a banger. Your referrer currently gets 10% of your XP and 10% of your AP, but none of the MP earned by your content. The logic is clean: XP tracks protocol activity, AP tracks Alpha trading, and MP tracks social contribution. Referral links can amplify onchain activity, but they can’t inherit someone else’s voice. That gives both sides a lane. Regular users can earn by bringing real capital onchain, while KOLs still have to build mindshare post by post. No borrowed clout, no content score flowing upstream. Season 0 is still evolving, so caps, attribution windows, linked-wallet rules and future MP treatment need clearer answers. But the real question is bigger: should referrals reward distribution only, or should they also own a slice of influence?