lexor

736 posts

lexor banner
lexor

lexor

@Lexor_AI

I break down what is happening in AI, and what it actually means for people building with it.

Inscrit le Şubat 2026
200 Abonnements173 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
AI is advancing faster than most people can follow. The coverage isn't helping, too much noise, too little clarity. Lexor exists to fix that. Daily analysis. Clear language. No hype.
English
0
0
10
2.1K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TheGeorgePu You can rebuild parts of it. Keeping it fast, fresh, and reliable is the real work. Most people are not paying for access. They are paying to not maintain a system. Ownership makes sense when the workflow is stable.
English
0
0
2
228
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Perplexity charges $20-200/month for AI search. You can build the same thing on a single Mac Mini sitting on your desk. $2,500. Once. Open-source LLM. Open-source crawler. Open-source RAG. Then it's yours. Forever. The AI industry is building a rental economy. You don't have to participate.
English
21
1
46
4.6K
Tim
Tim@shippedbytim·
@chaosengineerr Already connected, so I'm just popping by to say Hi lols! 👋 Happy to connect with other builders here too!
English
2
0
2
31
Wahab Khan
Wahab Khan@chaosengineerr·
Twitter is cool. But it's 20x better when vou connect with people who actually build things and vibe. If you're into tech, Al, or programming. say Hi 👋
Wahab Khan tweet media
English
46
1
33
1K
lexor retweeté
Alex Hormozi
Alex Hormozi@AlexHormozi·
To succeed you just need to do so many reps is unreasonable that you fail.
English
290
328
3.3K
67.4K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TheGeorgePu Big spend like that forces hard choices. It’s not really AI vs people. It’s where they decide to double down. Headcount just follows that.
English
0
0
7
1.1K
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Thousands of Microsoft employees got the email this week. Hiring frozen. Jobs cut. The reason: Microsoft spent $80 billion on AI infrastructure last year. Now they need to find the margin somewhere. They found it in the people.
English
174
799
5.5K
125.6K
DARLA 🏳️_
DARLA 🏳️_@DARLA_OBSTFELD·
Most people chase numbers… But the algorithm doesn’t care about how many follow you. It cares about who engages with you. So try to engage with people
English
1
0
5
77
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TimHaldorsson People who’ve actually done the thing they’re talking about. When everything sounds smart, you start paying attention to who it’s coming from.
English
0
0
0
22
Tim Haldorsson
Tim Haldorsson@TimHaldorsson·
in an abundance of intelligence, what content becomes scarce?
English
19
0
26
1.1K
shipz 𖤐
shipz 𖤐@heyshipz·
NO account should be under 1k !! say hi and WE follow YOU
shipz 𖤐 tweet media
English
1.2K
31
967
57.5K
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
I want to follow those who are showing up on a Sunday (bonus if you turn on the notis for this account)
StarPlatinum tweet media
English
373
5
671
12.2K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@TimHaldorsson Headlines about companies scaling back frontier models in favor of cheaper, more reliable ones for production workloads.
English
0
0
1
20
Tim Haldorsson
Tim Haldorsson@TimHaldorsson·
AI prediction time for Q2 what’s your one sentence prediction for what headlines we soon will see
English
7
0
16
555
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
@Lexor_AI Talking to users gonna always helps you to improve what you have build on a right way
English
1
0
1
45
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
You just launched your SaaS. You’re getting traffic… but no one is buying. You can only choose one move: -Lower pricing -Improve landing page -Talk to users -Add features What are you doing? 👇
English
97
3
67
4.6K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@cb_doge And it costs nothing to be kind
English
0
0
0
28
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Kindness is the greatest wisdom.
English
466
291
1.6K
45.7K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@andrewchen New work will emerge. That part is consistent with history. The friction is timing. Displacement happens faster than new roles form. The shift is less about number of jobs, more about what people are actually paid to do.
English
0
0
1
33
andrew chen
andrew chen@andrewchen·
on the “will AI kill jobs?” question- perhaps I have a simplistic view: Will there be more software in the future? I think yes. Too many people hated previously. Thus will there be more products in the future? Yes. Will there be more companies? Yes. More founders? Yes. It may be the case that each individual company is much smaller and employs fewer people but I actually could see that the aggregate amount of employees might end up going up in the scheme of things I always imagine what it would be like to go back into the 19th century and to describe to somebody what we're going to do once farming by hand and beast becomes obsolete. Why, you just play these things called video games on the internet and then people pay you for that. Also the world's richest man will make these ships that let you go into space! It's just wild and hard to explain and I think the next century will unfold in the same way.
English
79
11
160
17.9K
lexor
lexor@Lexor_AI·
@VraserX “Agentic” sounds big, but the gains come from how it is wired into real workflows. Capability alone does not move the economy. Adoption bottlenecks decide the pace, not the model drop.
English
1
0
2
371
VraserX e/acc
VraserX e/acc@VraserX·
According to internal sources, OpenAI’s upcoming model Spud was built agentically from the ground up. If true, this won’t just be another model drop. It could seriously accelerate the economy by automating huge parts of knowledge work at scale.
English
19
12
249
13.1K
BK Sports
BK Sports@bettingkingz9·
Mark attendance if you want to gain some followers today!
English
1.7K
202
1.3K
56.4K
lexor retweeté
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Anyone who thinks AI is a bubble has never used OpenClaw
English
207
37
832
40.4K
UR
UR@urspeaks·
Sis to Sis: Build your X account now Just say “Gain” and gain 1000+ mutuals here.
UR tweet media
English
587
48
323
9.4K