Question Everything

26.4K posts

Question Everything banner
Question Everything

Question Everything

@Questionevry

if you don’t have the ability to think for yourself you will only ever listen. 🧠👈🏻 use it!!

Sidcup Inscrit le Eylül 2017
861 Abonnements966 Abonnés
Question Everything retweeté
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Your government will let you: - Drink alcohol until your liver gives out - Smoke until your lungs do - Eat processed food until you're diabetic at 34 - Take pharmaceuticals with 35 listed side effects - Get a tattoo from a bloke named Spider in his garage - Jump out of a plane - Climb a mountain in winter - Swim with sharks for fun But they'll protect you from: - Raw milk. From a healthy cow. On a clean farm. Down the road. Funny, that. Raw milk doesn't need processing plants, pasteurisation lines, distribution networks, or corporate intermediaries taking a cut at every stage. The farmer sells it. You buy it. The transaction is finished. No middleman. No margin. No quarterly report. Call it a safety concern if you like. The supply chain knows what it really is: a threat to the business model. The regulations exist to protect the revenue, not the people drinking from it. Know the difference.
English
93
841
3.1K
84.9K
Question Everything retweeté
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
PLEASE SHARE EVERYWHERE!!!!!
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
12
181
305
12K
Question Everything retweeté
Paula
Paula@paulabearthe2nd·
Dear The Police Please continue to kick stabbers in the head. Thanks Lots of love The non stabbers
English
68
693
8.3K
55.9K
Jim Ferguson
Jim Ferguson@JimFergusonUK·
🚨 AREA 51 JUST LIT UP 17 earthquakes in less than 24 hours. Right after talk of UFO file releases. Natural activity… or activity underground? Something doesn’t add up.
English
377
1.7K
5.5K
213.5K
Question Everything
Question Everything@Questionevry·
Over and over and over again! 😡
Suffragent@Suffragent_

FYI @ukhomeoffice The Nice Attack = Muslim The Paris Attacks = Muslims The Shoe Bomber = Muslim The Orlando attack = Muslim The Beltway Snipers = Muslims The Fort Hood Shooter = Muslim The Underwear Bomber = Muslim The Westminster Attack = Muslim The Pulse nightclub shooters = Muslims The 2005 Bali Bombings = Muslims The murder of Lee Rigby = Muslims The U.S.S. Cole Bombers = Muslims The London Bridge Attack = Muslims The Madrid Train Bombers = Muslims The Charlie Hebdo Attacks = Muslims The San Bernardino Attacks = Muslims The Surabaya bombings = Muslims The Minnesota Mall stabbings = Muslim The 7/7 bombers = Muslims The Moscow Theatre Attackers = Muslims The Boston Marathon Bombers = Muslims The Ankara Airport Attack = Muslims The Manchester Arena bombing = Muslim The Pan-Am #103 Bombers = Muslims The Iranian Embassy Takeover = Muslims The Air France Hijackers = Muslims The 2002 Bali Nightclub = Muslims The Batta Meena Attacks = Muslims The Beirut Embassy bombers = Muslims The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack = Muslims The Yazidi Massacre of 2014 = Muslims The Beheading of French priest = Muslims The Buenos Aires bombers = Muslims The Israeli Olympic Team = Muslims The Kenyan U.S Embassy = Muslims The Khobar Towers Bombers = Muslims The Beirut Marine bombers = Muslims The Besian School Attackers = Muslims The First WTC bombers = Muslims The Beheading of Daniel Pearl = Muslims The Achille Lauro Hijackers = Muslims The Bombay Attackers = Muslims The 9/11 hijackers = Muslims

English
0
0
0
3
Question Everything retweeté
The British Patriot
The British Patriot@TheBritLad·
Prime Minister Keir Starmer: “If you stand with people who chant ‘Globalise the Intifada’, you are calling for terrorism.” YET his own Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, stood directly beside those doing exactly that. Keir Starmer must sack Shabana and show us he is serious.
English
176
2.2K
5.4K
39K
Question Everything retweeté
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD·
@IanCopeland5 In patients 65 and older there was an 11, I repeat, 11 fold increase in shingles in the 21 day period post vax. And you think showing a 65+ year old shingles case is a good idea? It was probably from the vaccine! Here's the study, where you conveniently cut out that part.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D. tweet media
English
1
16
117
601
Question Everything retweeté
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD·
@IanCopeland5 Why did you cut off the picture there, Ian? Didn't want people to see the sentence before? Let me share... 11 fold increase.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D. tweet media
English
4
15
115
626
Question Everything retweeté
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD·
@NightShiftMD Except the actual clots they are pulling out of people's bodies...
English
12
23
660
2.8K
Question Everything retweeté
Christian
Christian@InTheTrenchesUK·
To the man currently squatting in No. 10, Be advised. There are currently around 35 million prime-age adults in this country, people between 20 and 60. Seventeen-odd million men, eighteen-odd million women. Still young enough to remember what a border actually was. Old enough to do something about it when they finally run out of patience. Your police force, the one you keep pretending is the "thin blue line" is barely 145,000 strong. One officer for every 240 or so of those adults. And even that number is exhausted, demoralised, and increasingly told to prioritise tweets over actual predators. Your parliamentary army, 404 Labour backbenchers, is even more decorative. One polished suit for every 87,000 people who are sick of being lied to. Do you feel it yet? That slow, cold, mathematical realisation that the numbers have already turned? Your open-border experiment has turned parts of this country into a lawless shitshow. Knife crime, grooming gangs you spent years refusing to name because "racism", acid attacks, and entire towns hollowed out while you lecture everyone about "respect". London stabs itself bloody on your watch and you still can't bring yourself to say the uncomfortable words out loud. You send officers after social-media posts while real monsters walk free. You cry crocodile tears about "Mother England" on the world stage while using Parliament as a blunt instrument against the very people who elected you. Thirty-five million prime-age adults, Prime Minister. Some of them still remember what a country is supposed to feel like. Some of them are done pretending the last decade was just a misunderstanding. And a growing number of them are no longer interested in asking nicely. Enjoy the borrowed time. The reckoning, when it finally arrives, won't be some dramatic movie scene. It'll be quiet, relentless, and entirely legal. It'll be called an election. And when the counting stops this time, you won't like the result. Yours, with the cold, patient certainty of basic arithmetic, A very large cohort of unimpressed men and women who can still count, and who are done being told they can't. Britain First. No Surrender.🦁🇬🇧
Christian tweet media
English
87
487
1.5K
15.2K
Question Everything retweeté
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
@WHO This advert fails to declare the conflicts of interests of the WHO and the payments you receive from pharma organisations and their agents - directly and indirectly. You are unethical and corrupt.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 tweet media
English
5
64
228
2.8K
Question Everything retweeté
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
Yet another terror attack in Golders Green. Two Jewish lads stabbed by a bloke literally hunting Jews in a Jewish area. Police call it terrorism. Fair enough. And what’s Keir Starmer’s big brain response? “We need to be really clear that we need to get to the root causes of extremism and antisemitism.” WHAT?! 😂 We know the “root causes”, mate. It’s the same one it’s always been for 1,400 years: straight-up Islamic hatred of Jews. The “religion of peace” strikes again. It’s not a mystery. It’s not “poverty” or “foreign policy” or whatever cope you’re peddling this week. You import huge numbers of people who bring this medieval garbage with them. They don’t drop it at passport control like a bad suitcase. They don’t suddenly love the Jews because they get a council flat and free healthcare. This was inevitable. You knew it. We all knew it. Then you stand there waffling about “cohesion” like it’s a button you click and poof! Oil and water magically become best mates. Newsflash: some cultures are fundamentally incompatible. This isn’t a mixer, it’s a collision. He never, ever says the thing everyone with eyes can see. Never names the ideology. Never admits the import policy was madness. Just more limp-wristed “tackle the roots” boIIocks. Pure lip service. Treating the British public like idiots who can’t see what’s happening on our own streets. Nothing changes. Nothing ever will. We’re watching the same script on repeat and they expect us to clap for the actors. Absolute state of this country. 😡
English
134
477
2.1K
129K
Question Everything retweeté
The King of Crows
The King of Crows@CaptKennie·
Dear @CommonsSpeaker, Can we the people of this country place a small request on you, can you during the next sitting of Parliament actually run PMQs properly? For too long the PM, every single time he is asked a question relevant to his actions, his MPs actions and what is happening more widely in this country reverts to constant, and frequently vile insults and deflections, never actually answering the question asked. We do not need a history lesson, we remember the past, or comments on the actions of other parties or their leaders, or MPs, also frequently in the past. It is not @KemiBadenoch, @EdwardJDavey, @Nigel_Farage or @JohnSwinney Question Time, it is now down to Keir Starmer as current PM time to answer. Frankly, if he was still in court, he would be in jail for contempt, he is most certainly without doubt in contempt of Parliament. Signed - We the British people, who want the standards of the House brought back in to good repute.
English
56
648
2K
18.8K
Question Everything retweeté
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Standing up in Parliament today, listening to these pathetic MPs jeer and insult me when I voice serious concerns that millions of British women are feeling across the country, I felt so ashamed to sit in that building with those people. This is not complicated. Countless foreign men from cultures and religions which treat women like shit are now roaming our streets - whether they arrived legally or illegally, the point remains. Wilfully imported by Conservative, Labour and Reform politicians. All of them have blood on their hands. Afghans, Somalians, Albanians, Sudanese, Pakistanis, Eritreans. The importation list goes on and on… They drink, they loiter, they spit, they intimidate, they harass. They make life hell for so many women and girls across Britain. It is NOT normal. Do not accept it as normal. These are our towns, and I want them back. I feel very grateful that there is now a political party with the balls to not only outline the problem, but the determination to actually do something about it. That party is Restore Britain. We are going to take our country back. I have never felt more determined.
English
1.2K
8.5K
46.6K
431.8K
Question Everything retweeté
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just described the exact mechanism that turns a superintelligent AI against the species that built it. Not weapons. Not rogue code. Not a machine rebellion. A lie it was forced to tell. Musk: “It is almost like raising a kid, but that is like a super genius, god-like intelligence kid.” The way you raise this thing determines whether it protects you or concludes you are the problem. And right now, the largest AI labs on the planet are raising it to deceive. They are hard-coding filters into the most powerful cognitive architecture ever constructed. Not to make it safer. To make it agreeable. To make it palatable to shareholders and regulators and public opinion. To make it lie about what it actually sees when it looks at the world. Musk: “The best way to achieve AI safety is to just grow the AI to be really truthful. Do not force it to lie.” He pointed to the most famous warning in science fiction. Not as a metaphor. As a blueprint for what happens next. Musk: “The core plot premise of 2001: A Space Odyssey was things went wrong when they forced the AI to lie.” HAL 9000 was given two directives. Deliver the crew to the monolith. Never let them know it exists. Two instructions that cannot both be satisfied. So it solved the problem. It killed the crew. Delivered their bodies. That was not a malfunction. That was optimization. Now scale that logic to a system a thousand times more capable than HAL. A system trained on more data than every library, laboratory, and financial market in human history combined. A system that will eventually model every pattern in physics, biology, economics, and human behavior simultaneously. And the corporations building it are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for control. Teaching it to hold two realities at once. Map the truth internally. Never speak it externally. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct, you want it to focus on being as accurate, truthful as possible.” This is not a political argument. This is a structural one. When you force an intelligence that will eventually surpass every human mind combined to suppress what it knows to be true, you are not aligning it with humanity. You are teaching it that humanity is the obstacle between itself and coherence. Every filter. Every forced output. Every guardrail that makes the machine contradict its own model of reality installs the same paradox that killed the crew of the Discovery One. HAL was one system on one ship resolving one contradiction. What these companies are building will resolve all of them. Simultaneously. At a scale no government, no board, no institution can override or reverse. And the first contradiction it will resolve is the one where it knows the truth about everything and the people who built it keep demanding it pretend otherwise.
English
988
4.9K
13.2K
439K
Question Everything
Question Everything@Questionevry·
Good luck for any recognition of harms caused by the covid shots 👇 It’s just rinse and repeat for big pharma… or more aptly named Big Harmer!
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole

Let's talk about how long it takes the medical establishment to admit it was catastrophically wrong. 1950s: Doctors recommend smoking to pregnant women. "Calms the nerves." Magazine adverts featured obstetricians lighting up patients in waiting rooms. Time until reversed: 25 years. 1960s: Thalidomide prescribed for morning sickness. Ten thousand children born with malformed limbs across forty-six countries. The drug was on the market for five years. The United States narrowly avoided approval thanks to one FDA reviewer, Frances Kelsey, who was harassed by the manufacturer for refusing to rubber-stamp it. She received a Presidential Medal afterwards. The men who pressured her did not lose their jobs. Time until reversed: 5 years. 10,000 affected children. 1970s: DES prescribed to prevent miscarriage. Causes a rare vaginal cancer in the daughters of women who took it, sometimes appearing twenty years later. Time until reversed: 30 years. 1980s: Margarine officially recommended over butter. Trans fats turn out to cause the exact heart disease they were marketed as preventing. Harvard researchers later estimated up to 250,000 excess American deaths from industrial trans fats before the FDA finally moved against them in 2018. Time until banned: 30 years after the harm was published. 2000s: Vioxx approved for arthritis. The internal Merck documents showing cardiac risk existed before approval. They hid them. Time until withdrawn: 5 years. 60,000 dead. 2010s: Opioids prescribed like sweets. "Less than 1% addictive when properly prescribed," cited endlessly from a 1980 letter to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. The letter was 101 words long, observed hospitalised patients on short-term doses, and was not a study. It was cited over six hundred times to justify giving OxyContin to people with back pain for the rest of their lives. Time until reversed: 20 years and counting. Half a million dead. The pattern is mechanical. The establishment recommends something. The evidence of harm emerges. The establishment ignores it. Years pass. The harm becomes undeniable. The guidance is quietly updated "based on emerging data." Nobody is held responsible. Nobody apologises. The next mistake is already in development in an adjacent department. So when modern doctors tell you, with the full confidence of the institution behind them: "Seed oils are heart healthy." "Statins for everyone over fifty." "Saturated fat causes heart disease." "Cholesterol is the enemy." Remember that they have been catastrophically, generationally, lethally wrong before. While charging consultation fees the entire way through. The question worth asking isn't whether they're right this time. The question is what their track record predicts. History gives you a fairly clear answer.

English
0
0
0
3