Raiders Supporter

I thought it but just minded my business. I had a years worth of credit. Why would I graduate early? You meet the folks you gon be friends with for the rest of your life. Its a once in a lifetime experience. He need some scholarships.

"We created a monster" companies rein in AI usage as costs strain budgets “Compute costs are now beginning to enter the minds of both CFOs and boards. Consumers and businesses have been taught that AI is cheap or free and that is definitely not the case,” said Costi Perricos, global generative AI leader at Deloitte. ... some companies have told workers to use open-source models that can be run locally on their own servers or personal devices, reducing the bill they pay to AI labs and cloud providers. ... customers are still weighing higher costs against the promises they have made to investors about AI’s impact on their own bottom line and workers’ productivity.

LOL I tweeted this, & there are ppl under it asking me why I made him get a full year of free college done early. Apparently, I should’ve paid an extra $30,000 for him to spend 4 years in college to have more fun. This is why I do not listen to the internet. 🫩😂

I am hearing whispers that Midjourney is about to execute a giant rug pull.... They will be marketing this for body composition (fat percent, muscle mass) for the forseable future and all the talk about cancer and lifespan extension is about to be tossed aside for the forseable future. So the entire tech world got riled up over something that will be sold not as a substitute for an MRI but for a smart scale. 🤣🤣🤣

When sanctions actually work because there’s no shadow oil fleet and Chinese support behind the scenes to prop up a terrorist regime. Sanctions are a great tool for our backyard, but they don’t work in regions where our adversaries maintain spheres of influence. Which is why I’ve always said AMERICA SHOULD STAY OIT OF THE MIDDLE EAST!

JUST IN: South Korea’s president says Trump told him “the time had come” to turn attention to North Korea’s nuclear program.

It's amazing - read the comments. The general public no longer trusts medical professionals. They assume we want to gatekeep, that we have outdated reasoning, that we want to withhold information. They assume more information is always better. That being "proactive" about health must be a no-brainer. I tell the story about prostate cancer in the 1990s and 2000s, it all falls on deaf ears. I'm hopeful there will be a future where we can screen the population and find all cancers early. But it's very very unlikely to come to fruition as an imaging screen. That has to be the most unimaginative approach. It will always be mathematically true that you have to screen high risk groups, otherwise harm ensues. I imagine genomic testing -> identify at risk groups for particular tumor types -> targeted liquid biopsies (eventually)

You'll see a lot of doctors come out "against" this kind of broad screening system. They can even get quite agitated about it. This resistance stems from a well-established clinical consensus: traditional population-level imaging fails to improve health outcomes because false positives and invasive follow-ups do more harm than good. But this view suffers from an obvious blind spot. Existing studies rely on static data and completely ignore time-series imaging. And time-series is ignored because we haven't been able to afford to do high frequency imaging at population scale. Clearly, time series is going to be immensely more valuable than a single image. If you drop costs, value can go from 0 -> 1. On a more fundamental level, the argument against screening rests on an obviously false precept "More information is bad" -- just clearly untrue. More information better, you just have to interpret it correctly.