DOMINIUM

21.5K posts

DOMINIUM banner
DOMINIUM

DOMINIUM

@RootkitAlpha

🔶@Binance Square C. Creator / @CoinMarketCap C. Creator 🖋️ Satirical AI Cartoon maker 🎬🎥 Blockchain Analyst 🕵️‍♂️⛓️ 🫙yougivesomething.eth

♟️🃏🦋 Inscrit le Eylül 2012
1.6K Abonnements10.8K Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
SOON 💎🔑
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
6
5
57
3.2K
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
On-chain transactions from 4 hours ago show $774,000 $USDC was sent out from the Pond treasury wallet through the Pond multisig. So far, the flow : $534,000 USDC off-ramped $180,000 USDC parked in a Gnosis wallet Off-ramped so far: $414,000 → Kraken deposit $120,000 → LiFi Finance Another round of “infrastructure costs” apparently. Expensive UI frontend “infra” for sure... 😆 And by the way, $WPOND pumping does not look like any flywheel or plug is working, it looks a lot more like $PNDC dumped to buy $WPOND, say thank you to Fintechbanker...
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
3
5
30
1.9K
deniz bond 0x7 💎🐽🫧
deniz bond 0x7 💎🐽🫧@welovepauly0x·
@RootkitAlpha The protocol automatically buys $Wpond every 10 minutes worth 1.6 SOL, and then sent out as mining claims… This is the reason why is pumping.
deniz bond 0x7 💎🐽🫧 tweet media
English
1
0
2
257
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Pond0x sold the DEX dream. The fine print reduced it to a UI/router over third-party rails like Uniswap, under Pond Issuer Limited. Now Geoff. ai is selling the network dream. While its own Terms say 816 HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. only provides the Geoff. ai interface and does not own or control the underlying third-party network, nodes, routers, AISPs, or models. So again, the pattern looks the same. big narrative up front, legal distancing in the back. And let’s not ignore the obvious. Pond0x and Geoff. ai are not even papered under the same company. Pond Issuer Limited then. 816 HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. now. If Geoff. ai sits under a different company and a separate backend structure, how are all the undelivered Pond0x features ever supposed to go live? Sell the engine. Disclaim the engine. Pivot. Repeat.
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
12
5
37
2.9K
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
For the culture draining liquidity it’s fine Holders: you drain the liquidity from your protocol tokens. Pauly0x: draining liquidity is totally normal Holders: Totally normal and non-criminal behaviour right? You can’t make this shit up 🤣🤡 $WPOND $PNDC $PORK POND0X GEOFF
English
9
10
33
3.9K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
ZXX
3
2
25
1.9K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
ZXX
1
5
24
1.6K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Screenshot this. Bookmark it. This post is living proof we got lied to. 1001 Pauly0x lies. ♟️🃏🦋
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
23
12
79
16.8K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Image 1 “You get nothing.” Image 2 “You’ll regret not buying $1,000 $PORK forever.” Incredible character development. Now imagine giving financial advice with this level of consistency. Any resemblance to manipulation, irony, or opportunism is, of course, pure speculation. 🫠🤣
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
English
12
6
49
4K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
⚠️ Warning: In a live public space, $Pork project owner Pauly0x framed the token’s target around price appreciation. When founders promote profit expectations publicly, it can trigger serious regulatory risk. Disclaimers won’t protect that. 1001 Pauly0x lies. ♟️🃏🦋
English
11
11
67
3.2K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Imagine flexing as the “hero” calling out $PEPE for sniping 30%… when you sniped the same 30% of your own $PORK before anyone even saw the contract. The on-chain links are obvious. The wallets are connected. The receipts are public. But sure keep preaching. The funniest part? $PEPE ran to $12B MC. $PORK can’t even crawl past $270M MC. Wild watching someone try to play saint while standing on a pile of their own bullshit.
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
English
12
14
71
8.1K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
For the culture! $36,767,880 Millions in $USDC & $ETH off ramped from Pond Treasury. That’s only a fraction. 🧮🧾 $PORK $PNDC $WPOND GEOFF POND0X
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
English
13
12
70
6.6K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
POND0X: Three Years on the Pivot Treadmill POND0X began with a bold promise, a DEX that rewards users on every swap, yield provider by locking $PNDC & earning $ETH a product so compelling it would make #MetaMask and #Uniswap feel obsolete. Three years later, the community is left with a trail of pivots, stalled launches, broken mechanics, and large off-ramps justified as “infrastructure costs.” Investors didn’t sign up for a teaser reel, they funded a working protocol. What Was Promised vs. What Was Delivered Original hook: - Swap and get fees back. Never materialized. - Max-swap multipliers on selected tokens. Never paid. - POND DEX mass adoption. Never arrived. -Subsequent feature carousel PondWater: lock $PNDC → earn $ETH. Brief blip, then shutdown. - Lock $WPOND → $PONDsol: never went live. SPAWN: two launches, then endless countdowns. First event inflicted “haircuts”; the second failed its “per-wallet limit,” enabling a single wallet to spawn >1.5T $PORK and crater the market. Mining arcs: “Mine $PNDC / breed $PORK ” → never. “Mine $wPOND and get automatic rewards” → claims paid are a rounding error versus amounts “mined,” with an effectively endless claims queue. “Boost mining by max-swapping” → reads like wash-trade bait that enriched protocol-side fees, not users. PRO subscription (1 $SOL/mo): promised claim priority + bots + predictors + “endless new features.” Most never shipped; “automatic claims after each event” never became reality. The Perma-Pivot Pattern When crypto delivery stalled, the messaging shifted From DEX → yield → mining → subscriptions → AI. Enter GEOFF and “the next big thing.” New buzzword, same choreography Announce, tease, pivot, reset expectations, ask users to keep holding $PNDC / $PORK / $WPOND / $PONDsol. That money-glitch flywheel never reached investors/users, but it keeps spinning for the project owner. People put capital in for a functioning protocol and a delivered features. If you won’t deliver the initial objectives, the very reason people bought the tokens, then call it what it is, PIVOT0X, not POND0X. “The protocol of the next big thing” that never finishes the last big thing, leaving a trail of bankrupt users, trapped in a narrative where capital evaporated and was systematically diluted, just like the tokens themselves, diluted time and time again without end, under the guise of massive reward distributions to users. The Money Question Community traces point to tens of millions moving out of the Gnosis/Treasury wallets over time, labeled (allegedly) as “infrastructure costs.” - If the spend is real, where are the durable systems, stable features, and public uptime to justify it? - What infra? - Which vendors? - What milestones did that capital unlock? The Human Cost This isn’t “number go down” cope. It’s the cumulative result of non-delivery + dilution + pivots, where token holders absorbed the downside while “the next big thing” absorbed the narrative oxygen. Users who funded development deserve outcomes, not trailers. What Accountability Looks Like (Minimum) - Independent audit: code, contracts, wallets, vendor invoices, and grant/ops flows. - Public accounting: line-item spend + counterparties + deliverables. - Roadmap with dates & demos: no teasers recorded end-to-end product runs. - User remediation plan: for broken/abandoned mechanics (PondWater, spawn limits, mining claims, etc.). - Token-economy repair: halt dilution mechanics, align value capture with shipped, stable utility. - etc. etc. etc Bottom Line Investors didn’t fund a pivot mill. They funded a product. Until there’s transparent accounting, shipped-and-stable functionality, and concrete remediation for harmed users, #POND0X reads less like a protocol and more like a permanent preview. Finish something. Prove it works. Then talk about the next big thing. to @Gemini 👇
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
22
21
96
9.7K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
POND0X Protocol and Poolvoid From “Users are Kings” to the harsh truth of “Users are Broke.” What began as a movement of hope, innovation, and the vision of “Crypto 2.0” quickly devolved into a protocol filled with empty promises, abandoned features, and a community left stranded. For years, users were sold the dream of continuous revenue, financial freedom, unstoppable flywheel economics, and a complete ecosystem of tools: - Automatic swapping rewards ( $ETH & $SOL) - PondWater yield mechanics - Continuous mining rewards - Spawning - Multiple protocol tokens ( $PNDC, $PORK, $WPOND) promoted as assets value engines - Auctions - Predictions - Trading Bots And an endless list of features either never delivered or that worked only a few days before collapsing or being shut down but yet more than $70M have been moved around and out of the POND Protocol treasury wallets, God knows what for. The same pattern extended to the Poolvoid narrative, which extracted an estimated $4.5M so far from users who believed it was part of or aligned with the broader POND0X ecosystem, targeting the very community that had trusted the protocol from day one and presenting itself as connected to POND0X’s tools and goals. The result? - Brutal losses. - Deeply negative ROI. - Severe dilution across every protocol token. A loyal community that believed, invested, and ended up with almost nothing to show after three years of support, contributions, subscriptions, and continuous reinvestment. What was promoted as the next evolution of crypto instead became a machine of frustration, where reality fell dramatically short of the promises. - Instead of empowerment, users found disappointment. - OG's and diamonds mean nothing but the ones that where most harmed so far by being exposed to it since day one - Instead of products, there was silence. - Instead of “Crypto 2.0,” they were left with the weight of shattered expectations and empty pockets. Today, many look back and no longer see a revolution, but a textbook case of enthusiasm betrayed, where words grew larger than any real delivery. Three years have gone by Three Christmases filled not with hope, but with cumulative losses and pain, watching all your investment fall to near zero, all while being encouraged to hold protocol tokens long-term and to keep max swapping, max mining, and paying Pro subscriptions and Rig activations. Three years of dedication, energy, money, and life poured into a hole. As many users describe it, the final blow was feeling mocked, dismissed, disrespected, or betrayed by the very leadership figure they once trusted with their time, belief, and capital. Don’t even dare to publicly question or point out anything about the protocol, because on top of everything you've already lost, you may be openly shamed, ridiculed, or told your rewards will be withheld as punishment, with a “cope badge” as a bonus. For a community that supported the protocol from the beginning, the pain is not only financial, but also emotional, human, and deeply personal. And if you think this post is “cope,” then you’re simply refusing to look at reality. Because so far, the truth is, every dollar I invested, both in Pond0x and Poolvoid is gone or lost 99% of it's initial value, with none token valuation, no yield generated, no rewards, almost none mining rewards, just one way money flow so far after all this time. On top off that we must invest in hardware to actually keep going to the new stage or the countless pivoting if you like to call it that way? Why don't we reward all the users like promised at the beginning? Why not, distributing all the claims that people actually mined until now? Why don't make the protocol functional and the core tokens valuable like million times stated by founders, that made everyone HOLD THEM until now even after the innumerous dilutions and ATL's? Why not give back first to the entire community that is deeply invested in pond0x and make them financially capable before pivoting to another feature that will require even more Capital, like acquiring GPU's and hardware to be able to run nodes. Capital the community no longer has because it has all been diluted and invested across protocol features, tools, and tokens? And while many of us are living through some of the hardest years of our lives because of these losses, the people behind these systems certainly aren’t facing the same consequences. Do not normalize the brutal financial, emotional, and real-life harm this community has endured for three long years. People are hurting. People are breaking. And pretending otherwise doesn’t make you strong, it just makes you blind. It's time to give back before asking for more capital from the community.
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
38
19
121
13.3K
DOMINIUM retweeté
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Let’s stop pretending. 873 days since launch. Where is the infrastructure? Where is the product? Where is the community money? On-chain data shows $50M+ routed out through Gemini, LiFi, Kraken, Coinbase, CoW, Lido, and WETH, repeatedly labeled as “infrastructure costs.” Meanwhile, 90%+ of the POND0X & POOLVOID community is down ~99%. No product. No adoption. No delivered infrastructure. Just wallets getting funded while holders get wiped. This isn’t FUD. This isn’t COPE. This is basic accountability. Community members invested in protocol tokens tied to explicit promises of products and infrastructure. Those investments are now -99%. Do not normalize wiping out people’s hard-earned money. That isn’t “protocol.” That isn’t “building.” That is unethical and potentially criminal behavior toward people who trusted you. And let’s address the modus operandi: For maximum extraction, you used, abused, and amplified hype, FOMO, and nonstop posting on X. Once the money was extracted and the community capital destroyed, the narrative suddenly changed: • Silence • “We’re abandoning social platforms” • No updates on the protocol • No discussion of token performance • No accountability We’ve seen this before. You did the same with @puzlworld. Sudden silence. No follow-through. No closure. And the same pattern appears across multiple projects: Launch → hype → extract → go quiet → wait for people to quit and forget. This isn’t accidental. It’s consistent. And consistency is the clearest signal of intent. People didn’t just lose money, they lost time, trust, and opportunity. Ignoring that reality doesn’t make it disappear. It just proves exactly what this was. Accountability is not optional. $PORK $PNDC $WPOND ♟️🃏🦋👨‍⚖️
DOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet mediaDOMINIUM tweet media
English
45
23
102
13.9K
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Jimmy Edgar (aka James Edgar) the same guy Pauly0x paraded to the Pond community as his “trusted friend” and “spiritual adviser” milked the community for $2.5M+ through the poolvoid.eth scam with help from the Pond inner circle. Straight-up wire fraud. Yet people still send him ETH and ape every scam he launches.
DOMINIUM tweet media
English
20
7
51
4.1K
DOMINIUM
DOMINIUM@RootkitAlpha·
Quick question, are we building the future of finance here, or just stress-testing how long people will click random buttons for “rewards”? Asking for a friend. Click harder
English
12
1
40
2.1K