Dr Soupcan

27.3K posts

Dr Soupcan banner
Dr Soupcan

Dr Soupcan

@Serialmemer4

21y.o 🇦🇺 for a song named 'Piano Man', the dude with the harmonica wont SHUT THE FUCK UP

Inscrit le Şubat 2022
82 Abonnements82 Abonnés
Dr Soupcan retweeté
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
The US spent $300 million to save one downed airman in Iran. Australia meanwhile spent $300 million to prosecute our most decorated Afghan War veteran and charge him with war crimes. Our government literally paid for billboards and newspaper advertisements in Afghanistan advertising rewards if random people came forward with war crimes allegations against Australian soldiers. There is a sickness at the heart of our civilisation. We are a country and civilization with no will to live. Our political class believe that Australia is built on “Stolen Land” and that all white Australians are therefore stained from birth with the crime of genocide. They therefore have no will to live. They wish they had never been born and that the nation never existed. This is what it looks like when your elite hate themselves and hate the country
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet mediaDrew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet media
English
159
1.2K
4.5K
41.3K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
Something is really bothering me about the Ben Roberts-Smith case. Nobody likes being a hypocrite. Unlike most, I actually go for a walk when I suspect myself of being one. On one hand, this prosecution stinks of liberal bias. Out of thousands of potential war crimes cases the social justice warrior police chief could have pursued, she picked THE most decorated soldier on the entire continent. That isn’t justice. That’s a public humiliation ritual. On the other hand, I do believe actual war criminals should stand trial regardless of rank or honors. And I know what’s coming: “John, Roberts-Smith already lost the 2023 defamation case. Justice Besanko found he committed the murders.” Yes. On the balance of probabilities. 51 percent. That’s the civil standard. Criminal conviction requires 99 percent. The same fragile evidence that barely cleared a coin flip is now supposed to send a man to prison for life. Here’s why my post is not hypocrisy. When the school got hit in Iran weeks ago, I said mistakes aren’t war crimes, but if it was intentional or grossly negligent, someone should be court-martialed. That strike is recent. Physical. Investigable. The Roberts-Smith allegations are 20 years old. And here’s what the Brereton Inquiry, for all its 510 witnesses & four years of work, could never get: No crime scene access. The Taliban didn’t let investigators into Uruzgan. No Afghan witnesses interviewed. No secured scene. No blood-spatter analysis. No DNA No autopsies. No recovered bodies. No weapons tied to victims. The investigators themselves admitted they “lacked access to Afghan crime scenes and were missing the physical evidence that would normally anchor a murder prosecution.” So what’s left? Memory. Twenty-year-old memory from men in the fog of war. The science is unambiguous. Countless research studies confirms memory is reconstructive: later suggestion, media exposure, and repeated questioning distort it. This is the textbook misinformation effect. Confidence and accuracy decouple within months, let alone decades. Studies on soldiers who suffer PTSD show the gaps get even larger. I admittedly don’t know 🇦🇺 law but US courts admit decades-old testimony but warn juries it is inherently fragile, not scientific proof. Australia is treating it as load-bearing concrete. The media says “20 former soldiers testified against him.” Fine. Was all their testimony actually against him? How clear was it? Did 20 people watch him murder a civilian in broad daylight? And even if they did, you still have to prove the dead man wasn’t Taliban. In Uruzgan. In 2009. Without a body. Some will say I’m being pedantic. Yes. I. Am. Because Ben Roberts-Smith was charged with murder, and under war-crimes law the same act can be framed as murder, willful killing, or killing a person hors de combat depending on the framing. How it gets framed sets precedent for every future war. And here’s the question nobody in Canberra wants asked: Why is the trigger-puller in the dock while the officers who wrote the rules of engagement, approved the missions, and signed the after-action reports keep their pensions? The Victoria Cross winner hangs. The chain of command walks. Past “War crime” cases with more hard evidence remain “unsolved” That isn’t accountability. That’s a scapegoat ritual. You do not get a Victoria Cross just for killing. You get it for extraordinary gallantry, valour, self-sacrifice & devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy. And here is what Australia just told every soldier watching: the reward for a VC is fame which will make you a target for future show trials built on 20-year-old memories, prosecuted by a police chief with no combat but more ribbons on her uniform than you. If murder can be proven without hard evidence decades later. That isn’t justice even if he is guilty. Proof of guilt matters. That’s a Marxist humiliation ceremony leading to national strategic disarmament by lawfare.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

He won a Victoria Cross, the equivalent of a Medal of Honor, for killing Taliban. Now, two decades later, he’s arrested for killing Taliban. His VC citation: As he approached the structure, Corporal Roberts-Smith identified an insurgent grenadier in the throes of engaging his patrol. Corporal Roberts-Smith instinctively engaged the insurgent at point-blank range resulting in the death of the insurgent. With the members of his patrol still pinned down by the three enemy machine gun positions, he exposed his own position in order to draw fire away from his patrol, which enabled them to bring fire to bear against the enemy. His actions enabled his Patrol Commander to throw a grenade and silence one of the machine guns. Seizing the advantage, and demonstrating extreme devotion to duty and the most conspicuous gallantry, Corporal Roberts-Smith, with a total disregard for his own safety, stormed the enemy position killing the two remaining machine gunners.

English
147
430
1.8K
84.3K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
E. Darwin Hartshorn ⳩
"As far as that goes, I side impenitently with the human race against the modern reformer. "Let there be wicked kings and beheadings, battles and dungeons, giants and dragons, and let villains be soundly killed at the end the book." On three ways of writing for children. C.S. Lewis
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu

When I was a kid I always felt robbed when a bad guy didn’t get a sufficient comeuppance. Sometime that meant death.

English
4
56
540
13.6K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
I,Hypocrite
I,Hypocrite@lporiginalg·
I,Hypocrite tweet media
ZXX
59
2.1K
15.4K
106.8K
Dr Soupcan
Dr Soupcan@Serialmemer4·
@SimplyShae13 "ay bro can i copy your homework?" "sure, but change it a bit so it's not obvious."
Dr Soupcan tweet mediaDr Soupcan tweet media
English
0
0
2
29
Demon_Fae_Shae 🏳️‍⚧️ 🔆
"omg it's so generic!" I'm gonna hold your hand as I gently tell you something you're not gonna wanna hear: It's a Space Marine. They are generic incarnate. And that's okay. You just don't like Space Marines. And that's okay.
Demon_Fae_Shae 🏳️‍⚧️ 🔆 tweet media
English
57
12
248
54.2K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
Cognitolizard
Cognitolizard@Cognitolizard·
Cognitolizard tweet media
ZXX
46
12.7K
66.4K
469.1K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
MERICA MEMED
MERICA MEMED@Mericamemed·
And Hollywood is still claiming you can't portray emotions with a helmet on.
English
97
2.2K
19.5K
309.4K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
WIzIk
WIzIk@Wizik26·
Terrible, awful, no good, very bad #Snootgame comic I made in 2 hours
WIzIk tweet media
English
10
153
2.2K
18.7K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
WitWoe
WitWoe@WillyTheWendigo·
Thinking about the Portal 2 "Paradox / Logic Loop" gag. GladOS tries to fry Wheatley's logic center with a pardox ("This statement is false!") Wheatley is too retarded to realize there *is* a paradox. Made me realize, LLMs aren't AM, or HAL 9000. LLMs are Wheatley.
WitWoe tweet media
English
22
561
5.9K
77.9K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
Gérier | Only Indies
Gérier | Only Indies@OnlyGerier·
Se habla poco de lo importante que ha sido Enter the Gungeon para los roguelikes. Es cierto que no ha trascendido en la cultura del género de la misma forma que lo hizo The Binding of Isaac, pero se sienta a comer en su misma mesa sin ningún problema. Es una maravilla de videojuego y tengo un hype desmesurado por se secuela.
Enter/Exit the Gungeon@DodgeRollGames

Celebrating 10 years of Enter the Gungeon! 🎂 For a decade, 14 million players have stepped into the Gungeon chasing the gun that can kill the past. We’re grateful for every memory, every run, and every dodge roll. Thanks for being part of it, Gungeoneers. Here’s to many more!

Español
24
124
1.8K
65.5K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
Odem
Odem@odem_logs·
Triple affirmative am i right
Odem tweet media
English
31
348
2K
17.7K
Dr Soupcan retweeté
Holly Grayle
Holly Grayle@HollyGrayle·
Yeah. Apparently only SOME 'nations' get to be considered 'indigenous' - take the Maori, for instance. They conquered NZ, killed and ate the people who were there before them, and no one questions their claim to being indigenous. But if you're Anglo Saxon, and you're ancestors were in Britain for at least 500 years LONGER than the Maori were in NZ, you have to listen to how Britain was ALWAYS a country of immigrants, there are literally NO indigenous people, and Diversity Is Our Strength™️ Curious, isn't it?
🇨🇦 Women Exist ♀@Women___Exist

Is anyone else finding their respect for indigenous "nations" dwindling of late?

English
113
1.1K
11.3K
229.9K