
WebMind Network
407 posts

WebMind Network
@WebMindNetwork
Revolutionizing Web3. Decentralized, secure, and visionary. Join the future of the internet. 🌐✨ #WebMindNetwork #Web3 #WMN
Inscrit le Aralık 2023
43 Abonnements26.8K Abonnés
Tweet épinglé

5000 USDT Giveaway 🎁
Create account : refpa94452.com/L?tag=d_535255…
Use the Promo Code : BET369
✔️ Create an account and post a screenshot in the comment
English

Hey @grok, what is the probability that Netanyahu is died?
Just give a percentage, no explanations.

English

Have been following reactions to what I said about L2s about 1.5 days ago.
One important thing that I believe is: "make yet another EVM chain and add an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a 1 week delay" is to infra what forking Compound is to governance - something we've done far too much for far too long, because we got comfortable, and which has sapped our imagination and put us in a dead end.
If you make an EVM chain *without* an optimistic bridge to Ethereum (aka an alt L1), that's even worse. We don't friggin need more copypasta EVM chains, and we definitely don't need even more L1s. L1 is scaling and is going to bring lots of EVM blockspace - not infinite (AIs in particular will need both more blockspace and lower latency than even a greatly scaled L1 can offer), but lots.
Build something that brings something new to the table. I gave a few examples: privacy, app-specific efficiency, ultra-low latency, but my list is surely very incomplete.
A second important thing that I believe is: regarding "connection to Ethereum", vibes need to match substance.
I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". For example I think there's a large chance that the optimal architecture for prediction markets is something like: the market gets issued and resolved on L1, user accounts are on L1, but trading happens on some based rollup or other L2-like system, where the execution reads the L1 to verify signatures and markets. I like architectures where deep connection to L1 is first-class, and not an afterthought ("we're pretty much a separate chain, but oh yeah, we have a bridge, and ok fine let's put 1-2 devs to get it to stage 1 so the l2beat people will put a green checkmark on it so vitalik likes us").
The other extreme of "app chain", eg. the version where you convince some government registry, or social media platform, or gaming thing, to start putting merkle roots of its database, with STARKs that prove every update was authorized and signed and executed according to a pre-committed algorithm, onchain, is also reasonable - this is what makes the most sense to me in terms of "institutional L2s". It's obviously not Ethereum, not credibly neutral and not trustless - the operator can always just choose to say "we're switching to a different version with different rules now". But it would enable verifiable algorithmic transparency, a property that many of us would love to see in government, social media algorithms or wherever else, and it may enable economic activity that would otherwise not be possible.
I think if you're the first thing, it's valid and great to call yourself an Ethereum application - it can't survive without Ethereum even technologically, it maximizes interoperability and composability with other Ethereum applications.
If you're the second thing, then you're not Ethereum, but you are (i) bringing humanity more algorithmic transparency and trust minimization, so you're pursuing a similar vision, and (ii) depending on details probably synergistic with Ethereum. So you should just say those things directly!
Basically:
1. Do something that brings something actually new to the table.
2. Vibes should match substance - the degree of connection to Ethereum in your public image should reflect the degree of connection to Ethereum that your thing has in reality.
English

your everyday spending should matter
with AnotherApp, it does
AnotherApp@Anotherapp_io
track how your allocation choices, lock periods, and staking options shape your monthly rewards you can find the calculator that uses framework data on the interactive website adjust the variables: > total ecosystem locked tokens > monthly ecosystem turnover > reward allocation > your token allocation 3/6/12m understand the mechanics, and see how activity translates into rewards share your simulation in the comments
English

Let’s call it what it is — a coordinated FUD campaign on @binance to slow #BNBChain’s unstoppable momentum.
BNBChain’s growth is undeniable, and it’s making the competition nervous. 👀
Confidence isn’t shaken here — it’s doubled.
$BULLS fully support @cz_binance , @binance & #BNB.
The bull run is just getting started. 🐂💪

English

@BitMartExchange @BitMartResearch @BitMartExchange @aixbt_agent tell me what should i do now ? I will pay 200$ to Bitmart and get back a 46$ token ?
English

@BitMartExchange should I delete the Bitmart exchange? @BitMartResearch
I deposited a token Simpson from mexc to Bitmart but the token contact address is different, now i contact @BitMartExchange they tell me to give them 200$ fees but the deposited amount is 46$. More below 👇🏿
English

@BitMartExchange @BitMartResearch We will need to check with the technical team if we are able to recover your token.
Meanwhile, do kindly provide the following information: Return address after token has been recovered:
English

@BitMartExchange @BitMartResearch As the recovery process is likely to be protracted beyond two months with high costs due to how complicated it is, we will have to charge a 200 USDT
Kindly reply to the ticket should you want to proceed with the recovery process.
English

Create an account at MEXC Exchange and get more bonuses
MEXC Link : promote.mexc.com/r/JqqpxCln

English

@MYX_Finance @aixbt_agent what's your opinion about the Myx project?
English












