X Handala - Commentary with sources

@xavierjp__ This is misleading

It is not permissible to refer, in matters of Islamic knowledge, to anyone except those who specialise and are qualified in it So Whether it’s your favorite journalist Or a popular social media personality Or a famous celebrity Whoever it may be It’s not for them to issue fatawa on Islam and it is not for us to go to them for fatawa To post reminders, sayings of the scholars, Hadith and Quran with sunnier and wisdom is praiseworthy But to speak on matters we aren’t qualified to speak on is blameworthy And to ask questions about islam, to those who aren’t qualified to speak on Islam, is also blameworthy

@YasirAlHanafi @AbuTaymiyyahMJ

@AbuTaymiyyahMJ It has been so for many decades, Ustaadh. Unfortunately, the Muslim leaders are asleep. والله المستعان

Masjid Al Aqsa is in danger.

Scholars: Preferring Ali over Abu Bakr makes one a Rafida. Zayd b. Ali preferred Ali. Abu Hanifa said obligatory to support Zayd against Sunni ruler. Hence Halal to aid Rafidis/Iran.

I will block both Sunni and Shia who are disrespectful in their discourse towards one another on my posts Even if it costs me 75% of my audience You’re not wanted

@YasirAlHanafi @abdul_now @Farid_0v

Jzkl khairan, brother Abdul Rahman. So we both agree that shirk needs clarification. That’s exactly my point. The difference is you’re suggesting we take a hypothetical scenario and then we will be ‘forced’ to clarify what Shirk is. My proposal is the other way round: first discuss what shirk is as the main principle, under which several acts will fall. Once we understand the main concept, judgement of scenarios following that clear principle/definition will be easy. Also, the concept of ‘worship’ is concomitantly linked. Thus, it should be centred around worship and shirk. We should start by defining the main concepts and then move on to their derivative scenarios. It’s both logical and appropriate. My aim is to demonstrate consistency and coherence. I do not wish to restrict myself to one scenario.

This is a strange response. The whole point of @Farid_0v’s framing is precisely to force both sides to clarify what shirk is. Calling the scenario “unfruitful,” when it’s doing exactly what you’re asking for, is a rather odd way of avoiding the pressure of the question. If there’s a debate about whether a particular act counts as theft, that already requires both parties to bring out what theft is, what distinguishes it from other forms of wrongdoing, and why that case does or does not qualify. Simply pointing out that the question requires conceptual clarification adds very little, because giving that clarification is itself part of the answer.

Yemenis in the Hadhramaut region tore up a poster showing Arab leaders united against the Iranian threat, including Saudi King Mohammed bin Salman, and Yemen’s own President Rashad al-Alimi. Hadhramaut is not a Houthi-controlled area but is deemed to be under Saudi informal control via its local proxies.

It's almost always Neo Hanbalis takfiring & causing divisions. They say Abu Hanifa & Shia Layman are Kuffar

This is what Israel wants. Make the Muslims weak, backward and destroy our industry so we can't resist so they can dominate over the Muslim world and slowly expand their "borders". Any Muslim applauding the bombing of iran or are being neutral to this, is the real April fool

Here you have a Neo Hanbali claiming Abu Hanifa is a kafir

Hanbali - Ash'ari Unity.

Deobandi Madkhalis is what they are. They'll go after the likes of Sh Yasir Hanafi in a clownish manner but will not dare to go after their akābir in the same manner. Press these stooges with Sh Taqi Uthmani's stance and see them run.

“The followers of the Dajjāl will be mostly Jews, women, and Bedouins.” Sahih Muslim Madkhalis are bedouins.

Oh it became Halal after a year!

@mohammed_hijab @mehdirhasan

1. In Chinese academia, “professor” is an official rank based on teaching, research, and achievements a PhD is not required. Questioning this person’s credentials feels inconsistent. (Noam Chomsky has no formal qualifications in IR or politics, yet his title is never challenged the same way by lefties like yourself.) 2. Your second reply used a tu quoque fallacy and a straw-man (no one said “Jews wanted to take over the world”). Moreover on (3) no one claimed to be a “fan” of Jiang the criticism was only about how his points were handled. Most importantly, you never answered the core question from the video: How do you reconcile your left-wing positions on LGBTQ issues, transgenderism, secularism, etc. with Islam? We genuinely like and respect your work. We’d love to have you on the podcast for an open, good-faith discussion.

This is factually untrue and false and a lie as I explain, with evidence and receipts, here:

May Allah bless the family of Saud and rectify their affairs.

Okay, I’ve watched this video titled ‘The Greatest Betrayal in Dawah Scene History’, with the thumbnail stating ‘Two Gods? Not Shirk’. To be honest, I am disappointed in my brother Farid for giving such a response. Considering we have had several respectful private conversations in the past and that he is someone I considered a friend (at least I did), I didn’t expect him to reply in such a sensational, clickbait manner. It’s like me making a video, “Wahhabism, The Greatest Betrayal to the Ummah”, and then making a slanderous claim. Everyone, including Farid, knows that I never once said that believing in two Gods is not Shirk—and Allah’s refuge is sought. But, unfortunately, he repeats this slander multiple times in this video. I will not address the ad hominem attacks or those against brother Daniel, as I believe that damages the unity of Muslims, especially in the current situation. Brother Farid didn’t respond to any of my evidence or to the numerous quotes I provided. Unfortunately, he didn’t even have the courtesy to tell his audience once that I believe this tenet is not part of Islam. He kept repeating that small clip, adding his sensational and, dare I say, dramatic commentary to it. He did not provide a clear, consistent definition of ‘Shirk’. In fact, he provided no definition at all. However, he did hint that more videos will be made where he will address the evidence. Also, the timing of this video's release is interesting: at a time when many, including myself, have been calling for Sunni & Shia unity against the Zionists, I believe the release of this video is unwise, to say the least. Only Allah knows best what the true motive behind it is. Therefore, dear brother Farid, I have no personal animosity toward you. So, instead of engaging in a back-and-forth, why don’t we have a live discussion on this topic? We can analyse our positions. If you genuinely believe I am defending ‘Shirk’ (and Allah’s refuge is sought), then this will be a good time to correct me. Because honestly, after watching your video, I saw only personal jibes and how shocked you were at what I said. There was nothing academic or substantive apart from some references to history. This discussion does not need to be immediate, as I am still travelling. Also, it will give you as much time as you need to prepare. But I think a live discussion would be beneficial for everyone, inshaAllah. May Allah bless you.

Sulaiman Ahmed absolutely DESTROYS the "UAE" and calls then the sister of Israel 🇮🇱😳🇦🇪 "The UAE is the same as Isreal"

Daniel Haqiqatjou | American Skeptic

SNEAKO shouts out Daniel Haqiqatjou for defending him in Tate’s latest crashout 🔥 “Quick shoutout to Daniel. Appreciate him for saying that”