YOG

516 posts

YOG banner
YOG

YOG

@Yogabool

Ancient wisdom for modern business. The greatest teacher, failure is. AI Business • Startups • Macro

Inscrit le Mayıs 2026
179 Abonnements103 Abonnés
Bober_smart
Bober_smart@Bober_smart·
A 20-year-old guy from Japan created an AI construction girl and earned $3,737 in 2 weeks He used Claude to create photos and videos He came up with a new niche, "cute construction girl" and started a TikTok for her, which already had 54,328 new followers after 4 days Men started writing to her in private messages non-stop: they liked her a lot, and he decided to start a Fanvue TikTok is for brand awareness, and with the help of Fanvue, this awareness turns into money In 2 weeks, 624 men signed up for a paid subscription for $5.99. There, the girl does construction work, but without clothes on A little imagination + AI and your possibilities are unlimited
Bober_smart@Bober_smart

x.com/i/article/2055…

English
24
10
72
9.4K
Hex Horizon
Hex Horizon@Noderunner_Hex·
ANTHROPIC'S $2.4M LEAD ENGINEER LEAKED THE INTERNAL OBSIDIAN BRAIN AND WAS FIRED THE SAME DAY A private vault mapping the full model architecture. 22 neurons per layer, ReLU activations, weighted paths across every hidden layer. Feature inputs labeled, forward-propagation exposed, training notes attached. That is already the wrong question to ask about loyalty. The vault was not source code. It was the reasoning map behind how the model is shaped, layer by layer, decision by decision. The kind of document competitors pay nine figures to reconstruct from scratch. Here is where it stings. One engineer, one export, one afternoon. Four years of internal alignment work sitting in a Markdown folder. The public sees a leak. The industry sees a blueprint.
Hex Horizon@Noderunner_Hex

x.com/i/article/2072…

English
5
0
10
263
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
@kocer_eth A second brain is only as good as your questions.
English
0
0
0
5
kocer
kocer@kocer_eth·
THIS GIRL BUILT A SECOND BRAIN IN 2 WEEKS WITH CLAUDE + OBSIDIAN The interesting part is not the graph view. The graph is just the receipt. The real system is simple: Every book note goes in. Every meeting note goes in. Every email worth remembering goes in. Every video, idea, and half-formed thought goes in. Obsidian becomes the place where the memory lives. Claude becomes the assistant that helps turn messy input into structured notes, links, summaries, missing connections, and better questions. That is why this works better than a normal notes app. Most people use notes as storage. They write something down, forget the file name, then search for it 3 months later. A second brain only becomes useful when notes start talking to each other. A note about dopamine can connect to ADHD. ADHD can connect to productivity. Productivity can connect to meeting habits. Meeting habits can connect to personal branding, work output, or content ideas. That is the compounding loop. You are not just saving information. You are building a map of what you already know, what you keep repeating, and what you still do not understand. The underrated part: Claude is not the brain. If you let AI generate everything from scratch, you get polished noise. The useful workflow is using Claude on top of your own inputs: clean this note extract the key claims link it to related notes find contradictions show missing context turn this into next actions That is a real advantage. Not because it makes you smarter overnight. Because it makes your thinking searchable, connected, and harder to lose. The caveat is obvious: A second brain can become a graveyard if you only collect notes. The output has to be decisions, writing, projects, or better questions. Otherwise it is just a beautiful Obsidian graph with no real use.
kocer@kocer_eth

x.com/i/article/2069…

English
15
2
35
1.7K
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
A 22-YEAR-OLD BUILT A $42K/MONTH AI FILM STUDIO FOR $60. Hollywood spent $200M to keep you watching. He spent $60 to replace the system. Two decisions: • Pick the story • Pick the style Everything else is automated. Claude + AI tools handle it all: Script. Characters. Dialogue. Voice. Animation. This week’s episode: A cat in a chef’s hat cooking like a human while his boss yells from off-screen to hurry up with the sauce. The cat keeps cooking. No reaction. No panic. Just tension building in real time. The pan sizzles. The argument escalates. The scene feels alive. Two episodes drop every week. Fully automated. While he sleeps. Revenue stack: • Ads • Patreon • Sponsors • Premium revenue • Brand deals Last month: $42,000 profit. Tool cost: $140. One sponsor paid $9,800 for a single episode. Hollywood builds armies of people. This builds content like a machine. And somehow, a cooking cat ignoring chaos off-screen beats most “serious” productions.
English
0
0
2
29
Rich
Rich@RrichPRMR·
@Yogabool Yes, people like seeing the progress others make; it gives them hope that they can do it too
English
1
0
1
17
Rich
Rich@RrichPRMR·
She filmed her transformation every day for 8 months. It made her $38,000. The weird part? She barely edited a single video herself. Day one, she wasn't a creator. Just a girl starting over, who pointed a phone at it. Every session. Every tired face after the last set. Every small win. No scripts, no polish. Here's what everyone underestimates: a transformation filmed in real time is the most bankable content in fitness. Not because it teaches anything. A workout video gets a view. A story gets a following. People come back tomorrow to see what happens next. Her daily cost was minutes. She filmed raw clips at the gym — AI did the rest. The cuts, the captions, the on-screen text, the posting schedule. 240+ daily posts in 8 months, and she never opened an editor. Alone, that volume is impossible. With AI, it's a habit. Growth looked like every transformation: invisible for two months, then all at once. By day 140, she wasn't pitching brands anymore. Brands were pitching her. Because an ad inside "day 142 of my transformation" doesn't feel like an ad — it feels like part of a story people are rooting for. Brands pay a premium for that. She picked who got in, set the terms, and stacked sponsored posts, monthly partnerships, and affiliate links underneath. Total across 8 months: about $38,000. From footage of a process she was living anyway. Costs: a phone and ~$40 a month in tools. Now the part that should sting. Every day she trained, millions of people did the exact same thing. Same gyms. Same effort. Same sweat. The only difference? She pressed Record. Most people finish a transformation with a few before-and-after photos. She finished hers with an audience, recurring brand deals, and $38,000. Same journey. Different decision. Full playbook below👇
Rich@RrichPRMR

x.com/i/article/2071…

English
9
4
37
988
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
AI just made Tom and Jerry live action, and somehow it looks amazing
English
0
0
3
21
Rich
Rich@RrichPRMR·
@Yogabool therefore, attention needs to be monetized
English
1
0
1
22
Rich
Rich@RrichPRMR·
She films 15-second gym clips and makes $7,700/month. Not from brand deals. From a $34 program AI helped her build. Here's how. Her clips do one job: make you stop scrolling. No teaching, no talking. Fifteen seconds of a clean set, and every clip ends the same way — free starter guide in bio. That guide is the trap, in the good sense. To get it, you drop your email. A follower is rented from the algorithm. An email is hers forever and a list buys at a completely different rate than a feed. The system, step by step: She trains 4 times a week and films 2–3 exercises each session. AI cuts that into ~20 clips, writes the hooks, and schedules the week across TikTok, Reels and Shorts. Her editing time: zero. The clips pull 2-3M blended views a month. About 2,500 of those viewers grab the free guide. Her list grows by that much every month, compounding. Once a month she emails the list one offer: a $34 twelve-week program. She wrote the training herself — AI structured it into weeks, wrote the explanations, formatted the PDF. Built once, updated never. Roughly 1 in 11 new subscribers buys, plus a steady drip from older subscribers. That's ~225 sales a month. 225 × $34 = $7,650. Round it with a few affiliate sales from the guide itself — $7,700. Costs: about $40 in tools. No inventory, no clients, no calls. The girl filming next to her posts the same set, gets 40 likes, starts over tomorrow. Same footage. One collects likes. The other collects emails. Attention is free. She just refuses to waste it. Full playbook below👇
Rich@RrichPRMR

x.com/i/article/2071…

English
9
4
69
2.5K
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
THIS GUY SHOWED HIS DASHBOARD AND NOBODY REALIZED THEY WERE STARING AT $24,000 A MONTH Leads tracked. Pipeline staged. Revenue updating in real time. All of it running on autopilot while he slept. He built it for a marketing agency. Six people doing ops by hand. $32,000 a month in salaries. Five agents replaced 80% of it for $180 a month. He charges $3,000 to keep the whole thing humming. They watched a lead come in. Get scored. Get a reply in 60 seconds. Land in the CRM. Nobody touched a thing. They signed that same week. They never cancelled. Cancelling means hiring the team back. That math does not math. 10 clients now. $24,000 a month. The dashboard updates itself. He just watches the numbers climb. Bookmark this. The agency model just got rewritten by one guy and a quiet dashboard.
English
0
0
4
52
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
@Frogiik This saves time, but it also normalizes facial recognition everywhere.
English
0
0
1
14
Frogik
Frogik@Frogiik·
🇺🇸 U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the U.S. government plans to introduce facial recognition for passport applications within the next few months, allowing applicants to verify their identity using a photo instead of visiting places like Walgreens or CVS for a passport picture. According to Rubio, the goal is to simplify the process and save applicants time. "Our security system will verify the facial ID," he said.
English
2
0
4
62
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
Trump’s phone is getting clowned after the first reviews. People are roasting the video quality, and test clips are already blowing up all over social media. 📱💀
YOG tweet media
English
1
0
4
44
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
🤡 Trump said that whenever his kids invest in stocks or do anything like that, people think they have insider information. I kinda feel bad for my kids. No matter what they do, even if they're just buying a truck, people assume they've got insider info. If they buy a cupcake company, people somehow tie the energy used to bake those cupcakes back to my energy policy. So they're basically in a constant conflict-of-interest situation.
English
0
0
4
31
YOG
YOG@Yogabool·
Trump was out here flexin’ a $100 bill on his followers.
YOG tweet media
English
0
0
2
49
YOG retweeté
100F.exe
100F.exe@100F_exe·
🇺🇸 America's 250th birthday celebration is already lighting up the sky. A stunning air show featuring 2,500 drones transformed the night over North Richland Hills, Texas, with massive images of a rocket, a bald eagle, and George Washington. The patriotic display, created by Sky Elements Drone Shows, gave local families an early look at the celebrations leading up to the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman

🚨 TEXAS DOES AMERICA 250 RIGHT, 2,500 DRONES LIGHT UP THE SKY OVER DFW! Everything’s bigger in Texas, including Fourth of July celebrations. North Richland Hills put on an epic drone show with 2,500 drones forming Uncle Sam, a massive red, white, and blue eagle, plus pyrotechnics for extra flair. Iconic American imagery lighting up the night. This is how you honor 250 years of freedom. Texas knows how to celebrate the greatest country on Earth! God bless Texas and God bless America!

English
4
1
6
813
YOG retweeté
100F.exe
100F.exe@100F_exe·
THIS MODEL JUST MATCHED GPT 5.5 AND OPUS 4.8 ON REAL PHYSICS FOR ZERO DOLLARS. ZERO. Same prompt. Three HTML5 canvas scenes. Real physics. Four models. One of them charged nothing and still won. The test: a cannon demolishing a brick wall, a bowling ball knocking down pins, a tornado sucking in random objects. Real physics. No shortcuts. No excuses. LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 LongCat beat Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 on physics. Cleaner collisions. Nothing clipped. Nothing fell through the floor. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking output of all four. And it billed exactly nothing. The model that cost zero dollars just smoked models that cost half a dollar and nearly a dollar. The price to performance curve just snapped in half. Bookmark this. Free just matched premium and the premium models are running out of places to hide.
100F.exe@100F_exe

🔥 FABLE 5 JUST DOMINATED THE LATEST PHYSICS TEST AND THEN HANDED THE BILL. IT COST 6X MORE THAN OPUS AND 39X MORE THAN GLM. Same prompt. Three HTML5 canvas scenes. Real physics. Four models. One winner. One very awkward invoice. The test: car into a brick wall, wrecking ball through a house, catapult launching a rock at a castle wall. Real physics. No shortcuts. Fable 5 won every scene. Cleanest physics. Best overall results. But here is what it cost: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens ($3.12) GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens ($1.14) Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens ($0.56) GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens ($0.08) Fable 5 took the crown. GPT 5.5 came the closest and even edged it out slightly in the monster truck demo. GLM 5.2 won zero scenes but charged pocket change. Eight cents. Total. The benchmark ran on atomic dot chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. No cloud markup. Just raw token cost. The performance gap is real. The price gap is absurd. The king won but the king charged 39 times more than the model that cost eight cents. Bookmark this. The next battle is not about who wins. It is about who wins for a price that does not feel like a car payment.

English
2
2
8
1.3K
YOG retweeté