notzaqariaiman

TENTERA ISRAEL DI AMBANG KERUNTUHAN Ketua tentera Israel memberi amaran bahawa tentera berisiko menghadapi keruntuhan dalaman sekiranya kerajaan gagal menangani kekurangan anggota yang semakin meningkat, menurut laporan media pada Khamis.

🧵 1/n Why guerrilla warfare has no front line: In guerrilla warfare, there is no “defensive line” to break. And that changes everything about how war is fought and won. Without fixed fronts, the logic of advance, breakthrough, and collapse doesn’t apply the same way.

The Malaysian government is exploring the potential of nuclear power as a strategic response to the global energy crisis sparked by the US-Israel war against Iran and the subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Amar Fadillah Yusof said the move, which is part of the 13th Malaysia Plan, is a crucial step towards strengthening the nation’s long-term energy security and supporting its clean energy goals. “The need to assess the potential and feasibility of nuclear energy is increasingly relevant in the context of a changing global energy landscape, influenced by geopolitical uncertainty as well as instability in fuel supply and prices,” Fadillah, who is also the minister of energy transition and water transformation, said in a statement today. Several Asean countries are experiencing energy crises due to the US-Iran war and Hormuz Strait closure, which disrupted oil and LNG flows critical to the region

Iraq in 1991 negotiated a ceasefire. Saddam Hussein pulled back from Kuwait. The stated objective of the coalition was achieved. The UN mandate was fulfilled. The war was over. Twelve years of the most comprehensive sanctions regime ever imposed on a country followed. Five hundred thousand Iraqi children died. Not from bombs. From the sanctions. From the inability to import medicine. From the destruction of water treatment infrastructure. From the systematic economic strangulation of a country that had agreed to the terms it was given. Madeleine Albright was asked in 1996 whether the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children were worth it. She said: "We think the price is worth it." On camera. With her name attached. Then in 2003, after twelve years of compliance with weapons inspection regimes, after twelve years of sanctions, after twelve years of no-fly zones enforced by American and British aircraft over sovereign Iraqi territory: They invaded anyway. There were no weapons of mass destruction. They knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. The sanctions had worked. The inspections had worked. The compliance had worked. They invaded anyway. Because the compliance was never the point. The compliance was the process by which Iraq was weakened enough to be finished. Negotiations. Compliance. Sanctions. Inspection regimes. Another decade of negotiations. Invasion. This is the sequence. This is what "negotiations" produced for Iraq. Half a million dead children as the price of the ceasefire. Two million dead as the price of the invasion. A country that has not recovered twenty years later. This is the table they invite you to.

In 1990 Kuwaiti "schoolgirl" Nayirah Al-Ṣabaḥ testified she'd seen Iraqi Soldiers pull babies from incubators, toss them onto floors leaving them to die She was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti US Ambassador Saud Nasir al-Sabah, it was all lies.

In 1990 Kuwaiti "schoolgirl" Nayirah Al-Ṣabaḥ testified she'd seen Iraqi Soldiers pull babies from incubators, toss them onto floors leaving them to die She was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti US Ambassador Saud Nasir al-Sabah, it was all lies.

Libya negotiated. Let's be precise about what happened to Libya. In 2003, Muammar Gaddafi made a strategic decision to abandon his weapons programs, open his country to international inspectors, and normalize relations with the West. He paid reparations for Lockerbie. He dismantled his nuclear program. He cooperated with Western intelligence against Al-Qaeda. He did everything that was asked of him. He negotiated. He complied. He normalized. In 2011, NATO bombed Libya for seven months. His own military turned against him with Western backing. He was captured in a drainage pipe. A mob sodomized him with a bayonet while Western officials watched via satellite feed. Hillary Clinton laughed about it on camera. "We came, we saw, he died." The man who gave up his deterrent in exchange for promises of security and normalization died in a drainage pipe while the people who made him those promises laughed at the footage of him being sodomized with a bayonet. And Libya, which had the highest GDP per capita in Africa, free healthcare, free education, housing subsidies, and a functioning welfare state, became a failed state with open slave markets within three years. This is what negotiated security guarantees look like. This is the documented outcome. Not a fringe case. Not a misunderstanding. The most complete, unambiguous illustration possible of what your weapons are worth the moment you give them up. The lesson is not complicated. The only deterrent is a deterrent you still possess. The moment you negotiate it away, you have nothing left to negotiate with.