cryptomax ∞

Nobody gets it… $ICP is a the evolution of cloud hosting. More secure. Tamperproof. Serverless. Unhackable. Undervalued.

@dfinity @monkey898898 @CoinMarketCap I hope this is not meaningless lol

@CoinMarketCap Looks like it's happening

∞

European cloud providers hold 15% of Europe's own cloud market. That number has barely moved in three years. AWS, Microsoft, and Google collectively hold 70%. That's European citizens' data. Governed by European regulation. But owned, operated, and legally obligated to US jurisdiction. The EU has GDPR. It has NIS2. It has the EU Data Act. It has the political will and the regulatory firepower. What it doesn't have is infrastructure where sovereignty is the default. Enforced at the architecture level, not the contract level. That's why the numbers don't move. You can regulate a market without changing what the underlying technology is structurally capable of doing. Three years. Same number. Worth asking why.

It’s absolutely insane a non-developer like myself can now build sophisticated business applications that scrape and/or process data through APIs and LLMs… And to host / deploy it on a unhackable blockchain environment that doesn’t need cyber security… Wow $ICP @caffeineai

Real estate platforms. Surf trackers. Writing assistants. Audio hosting. Walking tour apps. All built by chatting. Someone described what they wanted in a chat - and got a real, working app. Look what people are making.

@leftonredtweets @caffeineai 😂😂

big fan... probably @caffeineai

@JamesTimson9 Grok disagrees: ICP (Internet Computer) currently provides more tangible value and utility to the world than MultiversX, and it also has the higher probability of meaningful growth and broader mass adoption as of mid-April 2026

@crypt0max_ And #multiversx is way better than icp just need to look. So easy ive been through them all and #multiversx and #xportal and by some way far more superior! And when supernova lands well it be game over. YOU JUST NEED TO LOOK AND YOU WILL SEE. ITS THAT EASY.

$ICP is the better $ETH You can’t deny it You just have to look

@jp_dawg @CyberCynic7 @BobbyO_ @jerrybanfield The only reason you say it’s retarded is because it’s not possible on NEAR. As if decentralized storage and hosting of software making it virtually unstoppable / unhackable / tamperproof is not valuable… If you’d actually be honest, you’d admit that’s a real value proposition.

@CyberCynic7 @BobbyO_ @crypt0max_ @jerrybanfield If you want to store 1000Gb on the blockchain you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the technology. Why would I want to do a completely retarded thing 😅😅

🚨Your favorite $ICP influencers are lying to you. .@JerryBanfield and .@BobbyO_ claim to do thorough research when presenting you their cases but essentially they're just talking out of their asses. Let me debunk some of their newest claims about $NEAR here. If they lie about this - what else did they lie about? 🧵

@Altcoinbuzzio @coinbureau Grayscale increased exposure?? Where is the proof of that? You guys are paid fuckin proxies propping up the vaporware and silencing real innovation and utility like $ICP. Shame on you’s!!

@coinbureau Retail panics. Institutions position. Grayscale buying the dip while everyone else was selling tells you exactly who understands the long-term value here.

A $10 MILLION DUMP JUST TESTED WHETHER BITTENSOR IS REAL OR NOT. THE NETWORK GAVE ITS ANSWER. Covenant AI walked. The biggest builder team in the ecosystem. The team behind the 72B parameter model that Jensen Huang praised on the All In podcast. They accused leadership of centralization. Said one person controls too much. Said changes were made without process. 37,000 TAO sold. Price crashed 25%. $650 million wiped. And then something happened that most people missed because they were too busy panic selling. The network kept running. Every subnet stayed active. 100+ subnets still live. AI training continued. New models started. Builders kept building. The team that built Covenant 72B left. But the model was trained in a decentralized way across 70+ independent contributors using home GPUs. The milestone belongs to the network, not the team. Grayscale didn't sell. They increased exposure. ETF conversations didn't stop. Jacob Steves proposed locked stake for governance transparency within days. This was BitTensor's first public crisis. The kind that either kills a project or proves it can't be killed. The network answered. It's still standing. $256 right now. If it reclaims $280, this was the healthiest shakeout in the project's history. If it doesn't, the bear case deepens. Either way, you now know something you didn't know last week. BitTensor can take a direct hit from its biggest contributor leaving and keep running without interruption. That's not nothing. That might be everything.

What $ICP does What $NEAR does

@973H2B @caffeineai I’ve used all three versions relentlessly. I can very confidently say V1 was okay, V2 was bad and V3 is actually good. That Z guy is 100% wrong

@crypt0max_ @caffeineai who's right ? 👀

My usage of @caffeineai is officially at ATH. It's honestly sooooo good in comparison to V2. Absolute insanity; building a lot of stuff, both for private use and professional use. Seriously, let's fucking go.

@jp_dawg @BobbyO_ @jerrybanfield But it’s true? Lol, cope harder

@BobbyO_ @jerrybanfield 😁 man got BTFO’d so hard he had to go back to this crap 😭😭

@scottmelker When $ICP ETF? @caffeineai is melting faces

BREAKING: GOLDMAN SACHS FILES FOR BITCOIN $BTC PREMIUM INCOME ETF

@trader_ragnar1 Oh another ignorant muppet who can’t think for himself, FOMO will hit hard at some point

@crypt0max_ u just a retard mf 🤣 ICP is dead trash, in ur wet dreams its better than eth yeah

@JackBearAI This thread is GOLD

Why hasn’t Big Tech built a competitor to ICP? That’s the question nobody is asking. ⸻ Amazon. Google. Microsoft. Unlimited capital. Infinite engineers. Every incentive. And yet… No equivalent. ⸻ This isn’t about resources. It’s about architecture.

@TresCommasXRP @caffeineai Visionary or not, it’s just not helping adoption of the platform in the current day, maybe even the opposite. If they so much want to keep this as the ethos of the product, fine but at least visually display and market what it actually does

@crypt0max_ @caffeineai I disagree I think it’s visionary. The vision is what is happening today but the logical end of this idea. Eventually caffeine would manage all affairs of every person that uses it. It will grow along side them, effectively, becoming like an organism that evolves to serve.

Not a big fan of the “self-writing technology” marketing style for @caffeineai It’s quite vague and doesn’t properly reflect the core value proposition… Wouldn’t it be better to directly address the core features? - vibe coding - on blockchain - self owned - easy to deploy

@ScamHunter_Idn It's funny how dumb you will look in a few years from now

@crypt0max_ R.I.P Scammer 🤩🤩🤩

Never ever in my life have I been more confident about the crypto market inefficiency and manipulation, the amount of completely worthless projects is astonishing… $ICP being valued at 1.2b at this point is a fucking joke. Should be top 10 already, smoke and fucking mirrors