punter
6.7K posts



He is IPS Bishnoi . He got married recently. This is the video of him glorifying some shitty tradition . He has the power to dismantle all this shit. Imagine wearing a uniform to uphold patriarchy. You don’t get to wear a uniform and then defend misogyny as culture.If power doesn’t dismantle harmful practices, it protects them. But he chose to glorify that shit because it pleases misogyny.



Non BELTERS meeda first moodu wkts padite kottadam 48 ball 50ni troll chesinantha easy kadu ra Lanjodkallara


JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Thousands of US Army paratroopers arrive in the Middle East, Reuters reports.

Indian restaurant owner distributing free samosas to anti-Trump "No king" protesters


PM Narendra Modi tweets, "On the occasion of Bhagwan Mahavir Janma Kalyanak Diwas tomorrow, 31st March, the Samrat Samprati Museum at Koba Tirth will be inaugurated. The seven wings of this museum are dedicated to India’s glorious history and culture. Numerous rare relics, Jain artefacts and traditional heritage collections are also on display. It also showcases the exemplary Jain culture and the contribution of Jainism to humankind"







@ajay43 We will build the airports, we will build the rail lines, we will build the expressways and you will use them and say, "This is too much building, stop.", and I will say, "No, this isn't. We will build more." We will build so much that you will be tired of building.



The women of India and Pakistan need to deploy our ingrained common sense and suggest ways forward in our relationship. We need a women’s caucus. Not to throw accusations against each other but to think calmly and sensibly about the future ahead. For the sake of our children. We need to bring in the counterpoint: without naming it, without sounding defensive, but making it impossible to dismiss. For decades, India–Pakistan engagement has been trapped in a single script: territory, terror, recrimination. We repeat it with ritual precision, but it yields diminishing returns. What if we widened the frame? In West Asia, especially the Gulf, our interests often run in parallel: energy security, diaspora welfare, maritime stability, crisis response. These are not abstractions since they affect millions of lives and the resilience of both economies. Engaging here need not dilute our positions, create false parity, or reopen familiar disputes. It can remain tightly bounded, issue-specific, and without prejudice to core differences. Skeptics will argue that Pakistan cannot compartmentalise, that any engagement risks being instrumentalised, and that peripheral cooperation has never altered core hostility. But the purpose here is not transformation, it is insulation. Not to resolve the conflict by other means, but to prevent it from defining all means. Some may also say Pakistan has found a “role” in the Iran crisis and India should not be seen as seeking one. But this is not about visibility or mediation. Our interests are structural not transitory. If anything, the moment underscores a larger truth: even adversarial states operate beyond their disputes when interests demand it. When the central track is blocked, responsible statecraft does not stand still. It explores parallel ones, carefully, deliberately, and on its own terms. Sometimes, widening the field is not weakness. It is strategy. The women must speak.














