
942
908 posts












Fix the fucking USER INTERFACE to the color pallet I said and stop complaining to me the token isn’t going up because “I hold to much” I sent you 1%. $21,000 usd dollars. Fucking unreal. The colors look like shit. Fix it.






This is a really puzzling post. I haven’t spoken about you at all. In fact about 24 hours ago I dropped you a friendly DM just to say hi but it was ignored. I agree with your mission, but find the execution flawed. Locking LP sounds great from a marketing perspective but in the real world liquidity managers need to respond to real life market conditions and the fact that the entire journey can’t be mapped out in advance. For example: let’s say you reach 100M mcap. Locked liquidity at current mcap would be wasted liquidity. You are already sitting atop a constant product pool with PumpSwap. So there will always be liquidity to support the “going to zero” scenario. But now all you have done is lock up good money at a lower price range that can never serve as support for critical levels with future growth in mind. There’s also the issue of painting locked overhead resistance should there be a major pullback. You’ll get stuck in the mud as all anyone will see was a long climb uphill with what was prior support now acting as resistance - and this is on top of the curved constant product pool you’re built on that already does an exceptional job at painting overhead resistance after a certain point in your growth. It also only makes sense if you have immense supply control, which this project does not (yet). You’re still mostly driven by the launchpad liquidity architecture - tokens are pretty much soul bound to that structure unless you have massive supply control. The other area I think you’re wrong is creating the burn tax. Sounds smart, but going to be impossible to execute because you don’t control the token (Pump does and it can’t be modified) and burning only screws with mcap. Buybacks and locks are better. Ask me how I know - I wish I had never done the burn we did. But live and learn. All in all - if I make the assumption that you are coming from a sincere place (I have no evidence to believe you’re not - but this is crypto after all and I don’t know you) then I would say that your mission is noble. We are pursuing different ways to solve the same problem. But at least someone is talking about the problem. I wish you no ill-will, and best of luck out there!

@wellgogether @TatoPicks Everything you said is false and a lie. Do not do it again. End of discussion.






