Mallory

How much have things changed since 1999? Here's what celebrity row looked like for Game 4 of the Finals - the last year the Knicks made it that far until 2026

I don't think LA is evil but I do think it's haunted. And that's why it is awsome

being single is so awesome bc I can do whatever I want (nothing) go see whomever I want (no one) and go out whenever I want (never)

Uhm. Colbert could save PBS. Please have your NEW show on PBS. We will buy all the tote bags. PLEASE.

Okay I need merch of this immediately

Larry Edmunds on Hollywood Blvd. Don’t give this place any of that vague bull crap. Nothing but respect for one of the last institutions left standing on the boulevard.

cinephile imposter syndrome until you talk to normal people about films

Used to be you could cast Paul Scheer in your movie. Now they get a hot MCU guy and force him to Scheer-maxx

@elaine_stritch It’s a totally normal reaction to meeting Julie Andrews.

I met Julie Andrews in 2015 and took a picture where I look actually insane but come on it’s Julie Andrews

Most people in the quotes and replies have no idea how television production works and the amount of people involved.

This took over the entertainment media cycle for months when this happened.

He should bring this format to YouTube.

Fifth Harmony in the Work From Home video

Cristian Mungiu’s ‘FJORD’ wins top prize, the Palme d’Or, at the 79th Cannes Film Festival.

Any good cults interesting in buying this temple right across from Dolores Park? Generational cult opportunity right here don’t miss out

@pandarespecter x.com/timecaptales/s…

Name a fat guy with aura:

I’m just gonna keep adding to this every time he wears a new beret

@Mikeedakid1 Surprise, surprise. Look who is directly profiting from the hate. thesun.co.uk/tv/38854022/pi…

CORRECTING THE RECORD Today’s subject: “The Royals Uncensored” Let’s stop pretending these shows are balanced discussions. They’re not. They’re carefully curated echo chambers built around the same rotating commentators, the same predictable narratives, and the same targets: Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex. Watch the format closely. A few polite minutes discussing the rest of the Royal Family… then suddenly the REAL show starts once Harry and Meghan enter the conversation. And what do audiences get? The tone shifts immediately. The smirks come out. The loaded language starts flying before the discussion even has a chance to breathe. A nonstop parade of smug commentary, cheap shots, and recycled narratives pretending to be objective analysis. The same recycled talking heads. The same outrage dressed up like breaking news. The same damn conclusions locked in before anybody even sits down. No real pushback. No serious counterarguments. No balanced debate. Just the same pile-on over and over again. One of the hosts, Katie Nicholl, was recently in court giving testimony connected to tabloid information-gathering practices and royal reporting controversies. Whether people like it or not, audiences are allowed to question credibility, bias, and objectivity when covering the Sussexes after years of openly negative and deeply personal commentary surrounding them. Then you have panels stacked with commentators and guests who already share the exact same viewpoint. So let’s ask the obvious question: If these shows are truly about journalism and honest debate… why are dissenting voices almost never invited on? Why not bring on someone informed enough to challenge the narratives in real time? Why not allow actual scrutiny of the claims being made? Why not create genuine discussion instead of another damn group affirmation session? Because the setup depends on agreement. It depends on outrage. It depends on feeding audiences the same narratives they already came there to hear. And people are starting to catch on. This isn’t about defending every decision Harry and Meghan Sussex make. Criticism is fair game. But when entire media ecosystems build profitable programming around ridicule, selective framing, and repetitive hostility toward the same couple week after week, people have every right to question whether this is still journalism — or simply outrage entertainment. Correcting the record means asking harder questions. Even when certain commentators clearly don’t want those questions asked. @RoyalsUncensrd @katienicholl

“some like it hot” (1959) dir. billy wilder