
Phyllis Ring
78.4K posts

Phyllis Ring
@phyllisring
Author: THE MUNICH GIRL: A Novel of the Legacies that Outlast War. Balance-seeking investigator of Reality.


THE MAN THEY CALLED A NUTTER JUST GOT A KNIGHTHOOD In 2003, the Post Office fired Alan Bates from his small branch in Llandudno, Wales. The reason? He refused to repay £1,200 that the Horizon computer system had invented out of thin air. He invested £65,000 in that post office. He made 507 calls to the helpline. He kept meticulous records proving the software was broken. The Post Office's response was to terminate his contract and walk away. Their own internal documents called him "unmanageable." People at industry conferences called him a nutter and a thief. He couldn't afford a hotel room at one protest event. He slept in a tent. So naturally he spent the next 20 years building the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance, dragging the Post Office into the High Court, winning a landmark judgment in 2019 that proved Horizon was riddled with bugs, errors and defects, and triggering the overturning of more than 900 wrongful convictions. Over 900 people were prosecuted. Around 700 convicted. 236 went to prison. The scandal was linked to at least 13 suicides. The compensation bill has now passed £1.2 billion. Fujitsu (@Fujitsu_Global) knew about the bugs from 1999. The Post Office (@PostOfficeNews) knew. They prosecuted people anyway. Then they destroyed the evidence, sacked the forensic accountants when they got too close to the truth, and deleted social media comments from victims. Paula Vennells, the CEO who presided over much of it, collected a CBE. She kept it for years. Bates turned down an OBE in 2023 specifically because of that. He finally accepted a knighthood in 2024. After the ITV drama. After the public inquiry. After the nation had caught up with what he'd been saying since 2003. Twenty years. Sleeping in a tent. Called a thief by the people who were supposed to represent him. Sir Alan Bates was right from the start. The institution was lying from the start. That is the whole story. Sources: @ComputerWeekly | @BBCNews | @ITVNews | @guardian |



Whether or not Europe stands with us, whether or not your journalists do their jobs, whether or not your politicians demonstrate the courage to act, I will fight for my people and my country.

While more than 150 journalists attended Prince Reza Pahlavi's press conference during his trip to Europe, not a single one asked about executions, massacres, or the current reality inside Iran. So no—this isn't vague "bias." It's a lens. Let's call it what it is: Third-Worldism. Look at the contrast. Nothing has changed since the 1970s. Back then, Khomeini was welcomed in Paris and romanticized by Western intellectuals like Michel Foucault, who framed his Islamist revolution as "political spirituality." Today, a press conference with Prince Reza Pahlavi—a figure speaking about regime change, repression, and the future of Iran—is met with suspicion, trivialities, and ideological vetting. Instead of asking: What is happening inside Iran right now? How many are being executed? What do the Iranian people want? You get: "Are you an asset?" "What did your wife retweet?" "Let's relitigate your father." That's not journalism. That's filtering reality through a preconceived narrative. Prince Reza Pahlavi represents something deeply inconvenient to that lens: a secular Middle Eastern country, aligned with the West and Israel—not imposed, but chosen—by a population rejecting an Islamic regime in favor of liberal democracy and pluralism. That doesn't fit the script. So instead of engaging with it, they try to disqualify it before the conversation even begins.






















