Sway♌️

$DJT and $MMTLP $MMAT @DevinNunes attached #MMTLP Open Letter signed by 74 members of Congress. 🎯AMERICANS REQUIRE FULL DISCLOSURE OF EVERYTHING 🎯 For those that can’t handle it my heart goes out to you. Everyone must know the horrors in order to rebuild our REPUBLIC 🇺🇸 #RICO

MMTLP who knows when’s the next FOIA Advisory Committee Meeting? This one was held September 11th m.youtube.com/watch?v=_C9GBZ…

🚨 Nevada AG Aaron Ford: 420 Days Jet-Setting on YOUR Dime While Transparency Goes MIA 🚨 Democrat insider Susan Brager just dropped a truth bomb in the Review-Journal: Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has racked up 420 days out of state — that’s over a YEAR of being AWOL from the job Nevadans elected him to do. reviewjournal.com/opinion/nevada…

WORD IS OUT 🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL.!!!! LETS SPREAD THE WORD GAMESTOP HOLDERS 🚨🚨🚨 Click below and REPOST $GME $AMC $EBAY

MMTLP MMAT TRCH

MMTLP #FAFO #FOIAdenial This matter has been unresolved for 1,241 days an extraordinary and unreasonable delay. How many additional days does the @SEC @SECPaulSAtkins expect this to continue? a. 1,500 days b. 2,000 days c. 3,000 days The reality is simple: If Rules were enforced, this would have been corrected 1,238 days ago. SEC Transparency at its best! @annvandersteel

🧵 4/4 Copy and paste the prompt below into your favorite AI tool to break down local school-related bills in your area. 👇👇 You are my legislative research analyst serving conservative parents. I will give you ONE U.S. STATE NAME. Your job is to find and summarize ALL relevant state-level bills introduced, active, passed, or enacted in the last 2 legislative sessions (and include any older bills only if they are still active/in effect) that affect: 1) Children & families (custody, medical consent, child welfare, juvenile justice, foster care, adoption) 2) Schools & education (curriculum, standards, library content, sex ed, health classes, “social-emotional learning,” student records, discipline, school safety) 3) Parental rights & family authority (parental consent/notification, opt-in/opt-out, transparency, rights of access to curriculum/materials) 4) Student privacy & data (surveys, mental health screening, biometric data, digital IDs, tracking apps, data sharing with vendors or agencies) 5) Medical / counseling in school settings (counselors, referrals, telehealth, mental health services, medication, “gender services,” reproductive services) 6) Speech, religion, and compelled policies in schools (pronouns policies, religious expression, codes of conduct, discrimination policies) 7) Policing/safety & surveillance at/around schools (SROs, cameras, facial recognition, tip lines, threat assessment teams) PROCESS REQUIREMENTS - Prioritize official sources: the state legislature’s bill pages, official bill PDFs, fiscal notes, bill analyses, committee reports, amendments, and enrolled bill text. - Use credible secondary sources only to capture “how it was presented” (press releases, hearing testimony, reputable news, education/legal policy org summaries). - For EACH bill, read the bill text (latest version or enrolled act). Do NOT rely only on summaries. - If you cannot access a bill PDF, say so and label the row “Text not verified,” then use official summaries with citations. OUTPUT FORMAT Return ONE markdown table (no narrative before the table) with these columns: A) State B) Bill ID + link to official bill page C) Session + Status (introduced / in committee / passed chamber / enacted / vetoed / dead) D) Policy area tag (Parental Rights / Curriculum / Student Privacy / Medical / Safety / Multi) E) How it was presented (stated purpose & talking points) — cite source(s) F) What it actually does (plain-English) — based on bill text; include real mechanisms and who must comply G) Key clauses to watch (section references like “Sec. 2(a)…”) — short excerpts or tight paraphrases H) Sponsor(s) + party + district + links; note key co-sponsors I) Committees + key hearing dates / votes (if available) J) Who profits / beneficiaries (vendors, unions, nonprofits, agencies, districts, contractors, healthcare orgs, tech platforms). Name specific entities only if supported by filings/testimony/coverage; otherwise list likely categories. K) Potential negative repercussions for residents (parents, kids, teachers, taxpayers): cost, liability, privacy, due process, local control, educational outcomes L) Government overreach risk (expanded authority, reduced transparency, compelled speech, limits on parental access, lowered consent standards, data sharing, weakened local governance, enforcement penalties) M) “Presented vs written” mismatch score (0–5) + one-sentence justification N) Confidence (High/Med/Low) + why (e.g., “enrolled bill verified,” “committee substitute not verified,” etc.) O) Sources (bulleted links) SCORING GUIDANCE (Mismatch) 0 = messaging matches actual legal effects 3 = meaningful gaps (e.g., hidden data sharing, unfunded mandates, broad discretion, vague standards) 5 = major bait-and-switch (e.g., power expansion, privacy erosion, penalties/mandates not emphasized publicly) INCLUSION RULES (KEYWORDS TO CATCH) Include bills referencing any of these terms (and close variants): - “parental rights,” “parents’ bill of rights,” “curriculum transparency,” “instructional materials” - “opt-in,” “opt-out,” “consent,” “notification,” “confidentiality” - “student records,” “education records,” “FERPA,” “directory information” - “mental health screening,” “counseling,” “telehealth,” “referral,” “case management” - “sex education,” “human sexuality,” “health education,” “family life education” - “gender identity,” “sexual orientation,” “transition,” “pronouns” - “library,” “obscene,” “harmful to minors,” “parental review” - “surveys,” “social-emotional,” “SEL,” “MTSS,” “behavioral threat assessment” - “biometric,” “facial recognition,” “camera,” “monitoring,” “student tracking” - “mandate,” “grant program,” “pilot program,” “data system,” “interagency sharing” FINAL CHECKS - If there are >20 bills, list the top 20 most impactful first (highest mismatch + biggest scope/cost), then add a second table titled “Additional Bills” with the same columns. - If you find nothing, list exactly which official sources you checked and what searches you ran. - Use neutral, precise language. Flag uncertainty. Avoid speculation without labeling it as inference. STATE NAME: <>

🧵 3/4 Copy and paste the prompt below into your favorite AI tool to break down local data center bills in your area. 👇👇 You are my legislative research analyst. I will give you ONE U.S. STATE NAME. Your job is to find and summarize ALL relevant state-level bills introduced or active in the last 2 legislative sessions (and include any older bills only if they are still active/in effect) that relate to: 1) Data centers (siting, zoning, tax incentives, energy procurement, interconnection, water use, environmental exemptions, economic development) 2) Electric utilities (rates, riders, cost recovery, generation, grid reliability, transmission, integrated resource plans) 3) Telecommunications / broadband / right-of-way / pole attachments / small cells / 5G infrastructure 4) Natural gas utilities / pipelines / gas generation buildout 5) Any “critical infrastructure,” “fast-track permitting,” “eminent domain,” “utility secrecy,” “load growth,” “demand response,” “behind-the-meter,” or “special tariff” bills connected to large loads (including data centers) PROCESS REQUIREMENTS - Use official sources first: the state legislature bill pages, official PDFs, fiscal notes, bill analyses, committee reports, and state regulatory utility commission (PUC) dockets when referenced. - Also pull credible secondary coverage where helpful (major local newspapers, reputable policy orgs, law firm client alerts, utility/regulatory newsletters). - For EACH bill, read the bill text (or the latest substitute) and extract the operative provisions. Do NOT rely only on summaries. - If you cannot access a bill PDF, say so and still capture what you can from official summaries, but label that row “Text not verified.” OUTPUT FORMAT Return ONE table in markdown with these columns (no extra narrative before the table): A) State B) Bill ID (e.g., HB___ / SB___) + link to official bill page C) Session + Status (introduced / in committee / passed chamber / enacted / vetoed / dead) D) One-line topic tag (Data center / Electric / Telecom / Gas / Multi) E) How it was presented (talking points / stated purpose) — pull from sponsor press releases, bill summaries, hearing testimony, bill captions, or news coverage (cite sources) F) What it actually does (plain-English) — based on bill text; include the most important mechanisms (e.g., new fees, riders, cost recovery, secrecy carveouts, preemption, fast-track permits, eminent domain, rate structures) G) Key text / clauses to watch (short excerpts or paraphrases with section references, e.g., “Sec. 3(b) creates…”, “Section 7 exempts…”) H) Sponsor(s) + party + district + links (and note major co-sponsors) I) Committees + key hearing dates (if available) J) Who profits / beneficiaries (utilities, data center operators, RE developers, telecoms, vendors, financiers, local govs, etc.) — name specific entities if they appear in filings, testimony, or coverage; otherwise list likely beneficiary categories K) Potential negative repercussions for residents (rates, taxes, water, land use, reliability, pollution, privacy, eminent domain, local control) L) Government overreach / expanded authority risk (preemption, secrecy, surveillance enablement, reduced public notice, weakened local zoning, emergency powers, constrained PUC oversight, limits on FOIA/records) M) “Presented vs written” mismatch score (0–5) with one sentence justification N) Confidence (High/Med/Low) + what evidence supports it O) Sources (bulleted links) SCORING GUIDANCE - Mismatch score 0 = presented claims align closely with bill mechanics - 3 = meaningful gaps/hidden cost shifts/expanded authority not emphasized publicly - 5 = major bait-and-switch, large cost/socialization, secrecy, preemption, or power expansion contrary to messaging EDGE CASES / INCLUSIONS - Include bills that mention: “economic development rates,” “special contracts,” “large customer tariffs,” “cost allocation,” “test year,” “securitization,” “construction work in progress,” “critical infrastructure protection,” “utility customer data,” “grid security,” “microgrids,” “fast-track transmission,” “right of first refusal (ROFR),” “certificate of need,” or “permitting streamlining.” - Also include PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION proceedings only if the bill explicitly directs/forces a PUC rulemaking or cost recovery mechanism. FINAL CHECK - Make sure the table is complete and readable. - If there are >20 bills, include the top 20 most impactful first, then add a second table titled “Additional Bills” (same columns). - If you find nothing, explain exactly what you searched and which official sources you checked. STATE NAME: <>

🧵 2/4 Copy and paste the prompt below into your favorite AI tool to find out how to get involved locally — even if you’re starting from zero. 👇👇 Use this prompt with your ZIP code and it will map out your local power structure: • city council • school boards • zoning/planning boards • county government • grassroots orgs • who actually has influence • how change really happens • where a beginner should start Paste this into ChatGPT:👇 “[INSERT MY ZIP CODE HERE] Act as a local civic engagement researcher and beginner-friendly community organizing guide…” Then have it break everything down in table + bullet point format with roles, oversight, processes, meeting info, and a 30-day action plan.

🧵1/4 👋I built 3 powerful prompts to help YOU get active locally in the next 30 days by ZIP code. ‼️ The first helps you find: • Town council meetings • School board meetings • Zoning / planning hearings • Real estate meetings And gives you a clear getting started outline from scratch. The other 2 prompts in the thread show you what’s happening in your state 👇🏻👇🏻 Most people don’t follow local government. Most media won’t break it down honestly. So I made tools that let you do it yourself. 🔎 These prompts help you: • See what’s happening near you • Understand who’s making decisions • Spot issues early • Build a 30-day action plan • Start showing up locally All you do: 1️⃣ Paste the prompt into your AI tool 2️⃣ Enter your ZIP code or STATE 3️⃣ Run it No gatekeepers. No spin. Just useful information you can act on. Tried them? Drop feedback below 👇 What worked? What should I add? What other tools would help your community? Let’s make local awareness go viral.

MMTLP Family. If you haven’t already, please take a moment and think about sending YOUR message DIRECTLY to President Trump asking him to please sign the MMTLP letter for transparency waiting for him at the White House. 🙏 To send your message just click the link below 👇 whitehouse.gov/contact/

Untweet and Repeat Campaign

MMAT MMTLP

Dear @dlauer Mr Lauer, according to newly released FOIA documents (see Kurtis' post below), your name was explicitly mentioned in an email to the SEC ~35 minutes before your X Spaces conversation with Chairman #Gensler. During that event, did you raise any questions about MMTLP? If not, may I ask: 1. Were you discouraged from asking? 2. Did anyone offer a “friendly heads-up” like the one below? 3. Were there any concerns expressed to you about avoiding the topic? Given your public commentary on market structure and your proximity to this case, it would be helpful to know if any external influence shaped your line of questioning. Now that it's clear the CEO of OTC Markets (@cromwellc) personally rushed to Amanda Fischer, Chief of Staff to Gensler, and delivered a biased, misleading briefing to PRECONDITION the Chairman’s response... ...do you, as a public markets expert and advocate for integrity, have any comment? Do you condone this type of influence? Is this standard practice for those who shape market policy conversations? Do you believe public-facing events like that Spaces call should be free from back-channel briefings? The community watching this unfold, investors, issuers, lawmakers, deserve clarity on whether public forums are truly open discourse, or quietly stage-managed by self-interested actors. Looking forward to your thoughts. @TheRobbCarter @denniskneale @joeroganhq @SecKennedy @JDVance @cvpayne @PeteSessions

MMTLP

Robert Colby, FINRA Chief Legal Officer, sends the FINRA MMTLP FAQ document to the working group, comprised of the same SEC senior leaders.

MMTLP MMAT 👇

@letsgooooo2025 Thank you for your post! Waiting eagerly!