I am okay with never adding quantum-resistance to Bitcoin and more people should be considering that position.

@BitcoinErrorLog Is that to say, if quantum comes at scale, bitcoin is fucked anyways? Because the tradeoffs to make it quantum resistant aren't a feasible long term solution?

Ready to bring ideas to life? Try Grok Imagine today

@BitcoinErrorLog People who have any interest in making Bitcoin a successful project used by humanity at scale.... Should soundly reject such a silly position.

For your attention: there is a serious matter of criminal media data, coded and embedded in the Bitcoin block chain and is being included into the proof-of-work and mining data. The segwit (segregated witness) feature was introduced and allows for the criminal media data to be validated by segwit alone. I am making efforts for an urgent investigation to take place.

@BitcoinErrorLog "I'm okay with never changing my password from "123456" to a stronger one, and more people should be considering that position"

Starlink’s high-speed internet is available in your area. Experience speeds up to 400+ Mbps to stream your favorite shows and sports, work from home, browse social media and more.

@BitcoinErrorLog Any quick bullet points to why? I don’t agree on freezing bitcoin, to be clear.

@BitcoinErrorLog The simple reality from what I understand is Satoshi era P2PKH are at risk. If that is what it takes to ‘unlock’ Satoshis coins and bring them to market, everyone wins because that’s more sats on circulation once again.

@BitcoinErrorLog You can stay in your chain. Nobody with real money in BTC want to risk that. Your nodes, your choice.

@BitcoinErrorLog It will be hard fork anyway, so just keep your coins, right?

@BitcoinErrorLog It can be added as a soft fork and people can choose to use those addresses. It’s the only way.

@BitcoinErrorLog "I'm okay with Bitcoin being cryptographically insecure and dying and more people should be considering that position." Why do you want more people considering retarded positions?