@QuantumAlteredX Not really, people just tend to trust experts more than dilettantes. The hypnosis is done by society, and it doesn't have to be with expert's opinions. Society often teaches the opposite. And just because you reject experts, you're still far from being free from the hypnosis.
No, I don't "believe" we went to the moon. This isn't a matter of theology.
I know we went to the moon, I know we have rovers on Mars, and I know the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, because all of those things are facts.
@Pwnidus@Luvh0ez19@kirawontmiss Many cameras have auto exposure which adjusts it to the incoming levels, similar to our eyes, but this one doesn't have it or hasn't turned it on.
@Pwnidus@Luvh0ez19@kirawontmiss Because it's still the same exposure as before. If you prolong the exposure time you should start seeing the night side of the earth, as well as well the stars.
@The_brownest1@kirawontmiss@Luvh0ez19 This is a perfectly fine question, and only a retard would think it's a stupid question. The given explanation is wrong. It doesn't explain it. The real explanation is camera exposure.
@Luvh0ez19@kirawontmiss That's a wrong explanation. In daytime, the sun lights up the atmosphere, which makes stars invisible. But this is above the atmosphere. We don't see stars here because of the camera exposure, which tries to capture the earth and the sun, and not just two bright blobs.
@GreenTeebox@JacquiDeevoy1 No, the defense is that there is no other bigger planet or object under the earth that would pull people from the bottom towards it.
@JacquiDeevoy1 And why are you leaving the huge earth beneath that? Of course, the gravity from the bigger earth would pull the ones on the bottom of the small one down.
@JohnScott848965@PhilosophyOfPhy It does, the Coriolis effect produces tornadoes.
But what affects movement is acceleration, constant linear speed, no matter how fast, does nothing. The only thing about earth's movement that has an effect is the acceleration in form of rotation. But rotation itself is slow.