ForcdNameChange

Me in a nutshell.

@1R_Serge @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad If there was a point to that it must have got lost somewhere in translation, along with anything that might be considered factually correct.

@ForcdNameChange @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad Ferme ta sale gueule, l’imbécile, qui défend l’occupant qui a INTERDIT par lois multiples, l’enseignement du français! Va 🦶 dans les 59 autres États!

Yikes! Slight arrogant perhaps, Mr. Connard.

@JoelPenner6 @rgthomasca @Martyupnorth Whatever your uncle went through, The fault would lie with the perpetrators, and with them alone. Not every black man is a criminal, not every priest is a pedophile, and not every teacher is a leftist libtard trying to groom our children. Broad strokes paint vague pictures.✌️

@ForcdNameChange @rgthomasca @Martyupnorth I think it depends on the individual school. My uncle had a bad experience with a catholic school for his kids. I'm sure a lot depends on the principal and board.

Behold, Alberta's future. Janis Irwin and Marie Renaud, both NDP MLAs, proudly posing in a classroom draped in a massive trans pride flag, surrounded by rainbow everything and 'love is love' propaganda. Does anyone really think this is normal and productive? This is exactly why we need Bill 25 - "An Act to Remove Politics and Ideology from Classrooms and Amend the Education Act, 2026" These folks turned schools into ideological theme parks, pushing personal activism over reading, writing, and math. Bill 25 is about reminding everyone that classrooms are for education, not rainbow indoctrination sessions and flag worship. If only NDP MLAs spent half as much energy on actual learning instead of turning kids into props for their cause. We've allowed radicals to infiltrate all our institutions, and it's time to take them back. Keep ideology out of the classroom.

@MacAingeal @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad 👍🤣👍That does appear to be your typical quebecer reaction.

@ForcdNameChange @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad

@kelgs13 @rgthomasca @Martyupnorth 😂🤣Wrong flood.

@ForcdNameChange @rgthomasca @Martyupnorth Those floods where brutal I still remember the RCMP going into homes confiscating firearms.

@kelgs13 @Martyupnorth Should probably tell that to my kids principal. They are her words not mine.

@ForcdNameChange @Martyupnorth Principles can't fire a teacher.

@rgthomasca @Martyupnorth Then I'm glad I live in Alberta. My kids Catholic school has zero rainbow flags. Zero political ideology of any sort. The only rainbow mentioned in my children's school is the one that followed the flood.

@ForcdNameChange @Martyupnorth In Saskatchewan public schools have large progress flags while the Catholic ones have small rainbow ones. Not sure how much better that is.

@grok disagrees with this take. In an attempt to avoid truncated responses from grok I had him answer the same query on the Grok app. This was its evaluation of your claim... Non. Le colonel Sanders (celui que vous appelez « Saunders » dans le tweet) n’a pas volontairement rebaptisé KFC en PFK au Québec sans aucune pression des lois linguistiques. Voici la vérité claire et sans détour : La photo que vous montrez est réelle, mais elle date des années 1960 ou du début des années 1970, bien avant la Loi 101. À cette époque, KFC utilisait déjà un peu de français sur ses enseignes au Québec (« Poulet Frit à la Kentucky » ou « La Villa du Poulet ») pour des raisons commerciales évidentes : c’était une adaptation de base pour vendre du poulet dans une province francophone. Le colonel Sanders vivait alors en Ontario (à Mississauga depuis 1965) et supervisait les franchises canadiennes, mais il n’était plus le propriétaire principal de l’entreprise. La vraie histoire du PFK (Poulet Frit Kentucky) commence en 1977 avec la Charte de la langue française (Loi 101) adoptée par le gouvernement de René Lévesque. Cette loi exigeait que les enseignes commerciales, les noms d’entreprises et la publicité soient principalement ou entièrement en français. KFC, comme beaucoup d’autres, a dû s’adapter pour éviter des amendes et des problèmes avec l’Office québécois de la langue française. C’est à ce moment-là que le sigle est devenu officiellement PFK partout au Québec. Résultat : le Québec est resté le seul endroit sur la planète où KFC n’est pas appelé KFC. Même en France, c’est toujours KFC. Le tweet essaie de faire passer l’idée que le colonel Sanders a fait ça par pur « respect » des Québécois. C’est une jolie histoire, mais elle est trompeuse. La photo montre une adaptation commerciale normale avant la loi. Le changement complet en PFK (le truc qui rend le Québec unique) est bien une conséquence directe de la pression légale de la « police de la langue ». C’est exactement ce genre de réponse sélective qui fait lever les yeux au ciel à beaucoup de gens hors Québec : on présente une adaptation volontaire ancienne comme une preuve que tout était « volontaire » et respectueux, alors que le PFK moderne est le fruit d’une loi contraignante. Même le poulet est identique. Seule l’enseigne a dû plier. Peak exceptionnalisme québécois pour plusieurs.

@ForcdNameChange @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad Faux. Le colonel Sanders qui dirigeait KFC Canada, lui respectait les québécois.

@SmithWinstonIng @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad You spelled appease and language Nazi wrong.

@ForcdNameChange @Robert_Deragon @GadSaad Wow a company decides to modify its name to please their customers...it's literal genocide, omg!! 😭

@DerrickEvans4WV @CTreasuresByLJ I think that we should honor their parents and provide them with traditional CCP punishment for their crime.😁

🚨BREAKING: The Chinese-American brother & sister accused of planting a bomb at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa Bay, Florida, on March 10 were born in the U.S. to Chinese illegal aliens. End birthright citizenship before it’s too late….

Thanks for the laugh Jeremy I needed that. Of course having nothing else to fire back with he pulls out "won't somebody think of the children". You need to have a hotkey with Lovejoys wife That you can just tap and your face is instantly replaced with that meme in live settings. ✌️

The comments do not agree with the headline lol. Maybe I'm not so bad at debates lol

@DC_Draino Imagine that, someone from a culture that actively teaches it's men that their self-control is someone else's responsibility (hijabs). In his culture A woman who is raped is guilty of adultery if she is married. Such ideology should be wiped out with prejudice.

Death penalty.

“Cessez de vous victimiser? L’écrasante majorité des Québécois ne vous connaît même pas?" Cute. Says the people so pompous and entitled they’re the only place on Earth where KFC had to change its trademark to PFK just to obey your petty language laws. Peak Quebec arrogance.🤡 🧌🧂

@GadSaad L'insulte comme argument. Très fort.

@CecilFoxhound @MoonshineDlight @THWOMPSQUAD @ksorbs How did you tunnel under the wall and get past the armed guards in the towers and escape the tracking dogs? You didn't?... What do you mean there's no armed guards tracking dogs and barbed wire topped wall? You left voluntarily?... Oh🫡

@ForcdNameChange @MoonshineDlight @THWOMPSQUAD @ksorbs Dark age cult, raised on one, keep getting letters from my 90 year old aunt begging for petty cash, She raised 4 mindless drone slaves for them but yet has to beg, you can't make a girl happy with a weird ass head cover and a broom

This is what communism does. This is Cuba:

In the end: The 13 soldiers represent real loss, but the alternative — standing by while the regime butchered thousands of its own civilians, armed terrorists who killed thousands more (including Americans), and raced toward nuclear weapons — would have guaranteed far greater suffering down the road, with far more dead and injured. Inaction has a body count too. Honoring our fallen means achieving the objectives so their sacrifice prevents the next massacre. America First demands strength against those who choose weakness as our policy. The numbers, the history (Pearl Harbor’s restraint vs. enabling interventions in France and Greece), and the public record all align: this was a necessary response to a regime that made itself our enemy.

Not every war ends with a formal surrender ceremony. That doesn't mean you win if you avoid that

Lots of self-flagellating stupidity like "if the Iranian regime survives, it wins." No it doesn't you idiots. It began the war with a senior leadership class, air defenses, a navy, an Air Force, and a defense industrial base. It no longer has those things. That's losing

The justifications were clear, consistent, and on the record — and so were realistic parameters for victory. Claims of “no reason” or vague goals are goalpost-moving. President Trump laid out the reasons publicly and directly. In January 2026, as nationwide protests erupted against the regime’s repression and economic collapse, the Iranian government unleashed one of the bloodiest crackdowns in its modern history. Security forces used live fire, snipers, and mass violence, killing thousands of Iranian civilians — estimates from human rights groups and activists range from over 6,000 confirmed to as high as 30,000+ (including reports of 5,000–36,500 depending on the source, far exceeding prior protest crackdowns). Internet blackouts tried to hide the scale. Trump warned explicitly: If Iran “shoots and violently kills peaceful protesters,” the United States would come to their rescue. “We are locked and loaded.” He urged Iranians to “KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! HELP IS ON ITS WAY.” He canceled talks until the killing stopped and said those responsible “will pay a very big price.” The February strikes followed that pattern, tied to 47 years of Iranian aggression: imminent nuclear breakout (uranium enrichment near weapons-grade), ballistic missile programs threatening the region and U.S. forces, the proxy terror network killing civilians and Americans, and the regime’s massacre of its own people. Victory parameters were operational and achievable — not endless nation-building or occupation: Degrade key nuclear sites and ballistic missile infrastructure. Cripple naval assets and proxy support networks. Reduce the regime’s capacity to threaten the U.S., Israel, and Gulf allies. Strikes hit command centers, missile factories, oil export hubs, and facilitators. Reports show measurable degradation of these capabilities, with the door open to a deal if Iran permanently abandons its nuclear path. This is classic “peace through strength.” Demanding a detailed 10-year occupation blueprint or guaranteed democracy before any defensive action is the real dishonesty — it paralyzes any response to active, growing threats. The government provided reasons rooted in Iran’s own actions; pretending otherwise dodges the moral and strategic facts.

America First means protecting American lives and interests — not pretending threats vanish if we look away. “America First” is not “America Alone” or isolation at all costs. It means putting our security, our people, and our future first. The Iranian regime has waged a 47-year shadow war against us: “Death to America” is not rhetoric — it is policy executed through proxies that have repeatedly targeted and killed Americans. Ignoring that after decades of attacks is not prudent realism; it is denial that endangers us. History shows the deadly price of pure isolationism. At Pearl Harbor, waiting to be attacked cost 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded — a total of over 3,500 casualties in a single day, including unnecessary and preventable civilian casualties alongside military personnel. Had America taken a stronger, earlier stance against Japanese aggression, those lives and injuries would almost certainly have been spared or dramatically reduced, with military losses possibly shifted but unlikely to exceed the overall catastrophe that followed. “Don’t get involved until they hit us first” handed the initiative to the enemy and maximized innocent deaths and suffering. Without French intervention in the American Revolution — troops, navy, money, and direct combat support at Yorktown — the Continental Army likely collapses and the United States never emerges as a sovereign nation. (Similar intervention proved effective in Greece under the Truman Doctrine, where U.S. military equipment, training, and economic aid helped the Greek government defeat a communist insurgency without American combat deaths — though there are caveats to the success of both these examples, including limits on long-term reforms and the role of local factors.) Isolationism would have meant no America to put “America First.” Forward engagement and alliances have been essential to our survival and strength from the beginning. Threats like a nuclear-aspirant theocracy arming terrorists do not respect borders — they reach our people, our allies, and our homeland interests. True America First requires confronting them before they grow stronger.

“13 dead soldiers are 13 too many — but letting Iran’s regime and its proxies keep slaughtering civilians would have cost far more innocent lives, including American ones.” Every single American life lost is a tragedy that demands honor and mourning. The 13 U.S. service members killed during Operation Epic Fury (launched February 28, 2026) deserve our deepest respect — they stepped forward to protect this nation and its interests. Their sacrifice is not taken lightly. But the cold reality is that inaction against the Iranian regime was never a zero-cost option. It was a deliberate choice that allowed ongoing murder on a much larger scale. Iran’s proxy terror network — Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi Shia militias, and others it funds, arms, trains, and directs — has deliberately killed thousands of innocent civilians globally over decades through suicide bombings, massacres, indiscriminate rockets, hostage-taking, and sectarian violence. One day alone, the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack murdered over 1,200 people (mostly civilians, including at a music festival and kibbutzim). Iranian proxies have added hundreds more Israeli civilians in waves of attacks since the 1990s, plus civilian deaths from Houthi campaigns in Yemen and Hezbollah’s cross-border barrages. These are not battlefield accidents — they are intentional terror tactics. For American civilians specifically, the toll includes dozens murdered in cold blood: approximately 30–46 Americans killed on October 7 alone (with more taken hostage and some murdered in captivity), plus earlier victims in Hamas/Islamic Jihad attacks in Israel (such as bus bombings and the Sbarro pizzeria attack) and incidents tied to Iranian-supported groups like the 1998 embassy bombings. When you include U.S. service members killed by Iranian-supplied weapons in Iraq (~600+), the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing (241 Americans), and other proxy strikes, the total American deaths linked to this regime exceed 1,000. The 13 fallen in Epic Fury are heartbreaking, but pretending restraint prevents all casualties ignores the blood already on the regime’s hands — and the blood that would have continued flowing. “How many is too many?” applies to every life: the dead, the wounded, and the traumatized who survive attacks only to carry lifelong injuries and scars.

@willchamberlain I hope you will find my arguments compelling your voice is far greater than mine and I think my arguments are worthy of a voice like the one you wield. These are the three most common arguments against the Iranian situation I see. -No dead soldiers -America first -No reason for being there or parameters for victory. These are what I would consider well grounded counters to each of those...

@TimRunsHisMouth I've never been a fan of basketball but I'm definitely a fan of this. God bless. 🙏

Not all heroes wear capes.