Nic Not Null

Don't trade blind. Follow the river. Follow the OI with @frenflow.

I don't see how @predictdotfun can resolve this as YES without undermining their entire exchange In an interview with the Lighter founder when asked if the token will have governance rights (in Russian, so bare with me): "At first no. Then in the future, because it seems to me that many projects in recent years, on the contrary, have been too much on this, as it were, but in reality this has complicated their decision-making. That is, it seems to me that more is better as a kind of utility for traders, but then maybe, as if when the project becomes even larger, and we will actually need to make governance more, as if distributive, decentralized, when there will be a decentralized sequencer and so on. This could happen within 2 years. That is at some point it will make sense, but I think doing it too early doesn't make sense because it will only slow down progress." TLDR: It's not a governance token So now you have a situation where: > The question and rules clearly state it has to be a governance token > Team was asked several times if governance matters, which they confirmed YES it does > @dingalingts previously said "if you believe it's not a governance token, buy no" > Certain team members have deleted messages (Not Dingaling), which were screenshotted