Randolph Carter

@boneGPT lmfao

The video that got the Supermicro cofounder arrested

@deredleritt3r wtf infiltrated by doomers

"develop proposed options for regulatory or governmental oversight, including potential nationalization... for preventing or managing the development of ASI if ASI seems likely to arise" The timeline is rapidly turning bad.

@JackPrescottX I have both, and signed copy of tech republic

How to save the West starter pack:

@DOJNatSec Doomers be like "There is no AI race China will play by the rules"

Three Charged with Conspiring to Unlawfully Divert Cutting Edge U.S. Artificial Intelligence Technology to China “The indictment unsealed today details alleged efforts to evade U.S. export laws through false documents, staged dummy servers to mislead inspectors, and convoluted transshipment schemes, in order to obfuscate the true destination of restricted AI technology—China,” said John A. Eisenberg, Assistant Attorney General for National Security. “These chips are the product of American ingenuity, and NSD will continue to enforce our export-control laws to protect that advantage.” 🔗: justice.gov/opa/pr/three-c…

@ns123abc Doomers be like "There is no AI race China will play by the rules"

🚨BREAKING: SUPER MICRO CO-FOUNDER ARRESTED FOR SMUGGLING $2.5B IN NVIDIA GPUs TO CHINA >SMCI co-founder Yih-Shyan "Wally" Liaw arrested today >personally holds $464 MILLION in SMCI stock >charged with smuggling BILLIONS in Nvidia servers to china >used a southeast asian shell company to funnel $2.5B in servers to chinese buyers >$510 million worth shipped in just THREE WEEKS in spring 2025 >built thousands of fake dummy servers to fool U.S compliance auditors >caught on surveillance camera using a HAIR DRYER to swap serial number stickers >coordinated the whole thing over encrypted group chats >SMCI down 12% after hours >faces up to 30 years in federal prison ITS SO OVER…

@Polymarket We've got to be careful of cult members tricking our older politicians too like what happened with Bernie

JUST IN: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls on tech leaders to "be careful not to scare people" regarding AI.

@NaderLikeLadder @saranormous @Baxate @karpathy How much...

THE FIRST DGX STATION IS ONLINE I got to witness this historic event We're now in a world of GB300 rippin tokens under your desk 24/7

@So8res Just trying to scare people "people don't program computers, they program the compilers that..."

People don't program AIs. They program the machine that grows the AI. AI behavior is an emergent consequence of complex internal machinery that literally nobody understands.

Major update to the 𝕏 AI recommendation algorithm rolling out next week. This will be open sourced at the same time.

@ENERGY @POTUS Make sure doomers don't regulate AI into oblivion

.@POTUS’ Cyber Strategy for America will ensure we remain unrivaled in cyberspace, with critical infrastructure security as a key pillar. As the Sector Risk Management Agency for the energy sector, strengthening America’s energy systems’ security & resilience is a top priority.

@AdamThierer Ouch

Senator Marsha Blackburn's massive new AI regulation bill -- 291 pages of near endless mandates🤯-- would make European technocrats blush with envy if it ever passed. The layers of red tape contained in this proposal would create a compliance cost hell for small innovators, and the liability provisions would spawn an endless litigation hell that would be a trial lawyers dream once they start filing frivolous lawsuits based on the completely open-ended theories of harm​ throughout the bill. The radical ​regulatory approach ​embodied in the Blackburn bill is completely at odds with the Trump AI Action plan vision and her measure would undermine American AI leadership at a time when our nation is in the middle of the most crucial advanced technology race in modern history. It represents a recipe for technological stagnation and hyper-politicization of technology markets and speech that must be completely rejected.

@RokoMijic @NateH8574 They still shouldn't be able to put on a fake "AI scientist" hat

@RandolphCarterZ @NateH8574 But people generally don't ask superforecasters - at least not in this hype-y way superforecasters have reputations to defend and they will not back sensationalist forecasts

AI Risk is really a misframing Imagine you're on a sinking ship and someone says you shouldn't get in the lifeboat because of "small boat risk". The risk is the risk that you die, not that you die specifically because you're on a small boat. Without AI, we are probably all going to die. And our cultures and extended families are also going to die, but for a different reason (politics/war/migration/low fertility). I already feel that the world I was most comfortable in has died; my friends and family are mostly gone. My country stopped existing between 2007 and 2022. The ship has nearly sunk already.

@RokoMijic @NateH8574 Well then we can call it superforecaster or whatever The problem is weirdos with backgrounds in psychology who read some sci-fi and game theory calling themselves AI scientists / experts

@RandolphCarterZ @NateH8574 I hate the idea that training ML models makes someone qualified to predict the future of planet Earth because they really are two almost diametrically opposed skillsets

@AnjneyMidha Let's go. Non bureaucrat-blockable AI.

@So8res The result is overhyped and superintelligence is benign. Terrorists can download models 100x more powerful than ones doomers tried to ban in 2023 over bioweapon fears and yet 0 deaths.

If someone says they're trying to build a superintelligence that poses a substantial chance of ending the world, "Eh whatever; you'll probably fail" stops being a good societal response at around the time the opaque machines start generating novel physics results.

@JordanSchachtel It's true

@NateH8574 @RokoMijic Top AI scientist? What AI models / architectures has he created?

Here this is basically a risk assessment turned into a book from the TOP AI scientist in the world AI only has to escape containment once and that could be enough, I suggest you watch the video as the issue is we are not making AI at this point, we are growing it. AI should not be used for us to think, it should not invent things for us and even allowing it to only invent life saving treatment for us can be humanity ending which is also explained in the video. youtube.com/watch?v=D8RtMH…