Sol Zelic ®

565 posts

Sol Zelic ® banner
Sol Zelic ®

Sol Zelic ®

@Solzelic

Unemployed Founder ⚙️ Mapping the structures of tech, capital and beyond I look at the machine and write exactly what is broken.

शामिल हुए Ocak 2023
680 फ़ॉलोइंग100 फ़ॉलोवर्स
पिन किया गया ट्वीट
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
We need an open-source political party.
English
0
0
2
76
shiv
shiv@shivkanthb·
built a tiny rayban display app to view claude code's status i can make myself some tea, vacuum or read a book when my agents are hard at it and address them when they need my attn
English
30
9
300
48.3K
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
Brett Adcock
Brett Adcock@adcock_brett·
Power On
Brett Adcock tweet media
English
274
293
4.7K
263.7K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@TorontoStar It’s not that Canadians aren’t ambitious. BlackBerry was the visible case. We had the company, the talent, and the early proof. Then the conditions required to keep scaling it were allowed to erode. Everything since has followed the same logic.
English
0
0
2
1.7K
Toronto Star
Toronto Star@TorontoStar·
Don't hate Elon Musk for being a trillionaire. Canada needs more ambitious, wealthy entrepreneurs trib.al/ats1m91
English
850
218
2.6K
1.6M
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
I hate to admit it but the loop people were right
English
347
107
4.9K
735.2K
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
Convergence Boy
Convergence Boy@vicnaum·
Don't know who did this, but I want that!
English
81
94
2.9K
341.5K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@_dylanga There are Claude wrapper plus or minus a few steps.
English
0
0
0
17
Dylan Garcia
Dylan Garcia@_dylanga·
I'm not sure I understand what most software companies are building nowadays
English
91
0
248
40.2K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
I actually respect what Palantir built: the vision, the tech that works, and how Alex Karp talks about it without the usual bullshit. The problem isn’t the intentions. The problem is the structure. They’re building a single platform that pulls data from everywhere into one place and layers AI on top to automate decisions at scale. (From an AI safety perspective.) That means one system ends up with far more visibility and steering power over operations and choices than anyone else. Put that in private hands with founder-level control, and when you look at the companies they partner with, it stops feeling like a neutral tool. They named it after the palantir on purpose. What am I missing?
English
0
0
0
47
Eliano A Younes
Eliano A Younes@eliano·
@Solzelic you’re sources of information on Palantir are likely… flawed just so you know
English
2
0
4
255
Eliano A Younes
Eliano A Younes@eliano·
Palantir is a global lifestyle brand
English
19
11
268
26.7K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@eliano The collection does go hard though
English
0
0
1
15
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@eliano That sentence said out loud.. is dystopian just so you know.
English
2
0
0
193
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@elonmusk @SpaceX On Starlink scaling: With 10k+ satellites and plans for 15k–30k+ maneuver rates are already high (50k avoidance burns in recent 6 months). How does propellant budget and cascaded avoidance complexity scale in denser shells? Kepler syndrome risk is exponential.
English
0
0
0
10
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@JonErlichman And I would be surprised if revenue is not greater than $1T in 2031
English
501
473
6.1K
443.6K
Jon Erlichman
Jon Erlichman@JonErlichman·
SpaceX's projected revenue: 2040: $3.4 trillion (estimate) 2030: $330 billion (estimate) 2028: $160 billion (estimate) 2025: $18.7 billion (actual) Source: Morgan Stanley estimates
English
298
336
4.8K
1.4M
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
You teach the system how you think so it can keep going when you’re not there to think it. Right now most of what gets called institutional memory is still just documents the model pulls from. The actual gap is building something with real agency, something that holds how decisions get made and gets sharper on its own instead of needing people to keep feeding it the same patterns. How do you close that without the loop learning to run without the people who started it?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Ultimately replacing them.
English
0
0
0
968
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
Lewis Hamilton
Lewis Hamilton@LewisHamilton·
REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE
Lewis Hamilton tweet media
English
7.5K
104.4K
485.9K
10.2M
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
SemiAnalysis
SemiAnalysis@SemiAnalysis_·
SemiAnalysis tweet media
David Sacks@DavidSacks

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

ZXX
43
114
3.2K
427.3K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@oprydai Do you think we’re in a hype cycle with robotics because of AI? AI allows for advancements, but the bottleneck is physics data. How do you see the labs getting around that?
English
0
0
0
58
Sol Zelic ® रीट्वीट किया
Mustafa
Mustafa@oprydai·
Robotics is more of a physics benchmark than an AI benchmark
English
8
2
46
2.8K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@pmitu Build it because the active creation is why you’re here. Money comes with doing a good job.
English
0
0
1
35
Paul Mit
Paul Mit@pmitu·
Don't build for fun. Build for money.
English
292
100
1K
37.8K
Sol Zelic ®
Sol Zelic ®@Solzelic·
@DaveShapi All loops, all the way down. Identify your loops.
Sol Zelic ® tweet media
English
0
0
0
8