Greenhawk

@usebloom_base Why not have a TG? I can’t find info on tiers or any docs?

BLOOM CITY FOUNDING CITIZENS To celebrate the launch of Bloom City, we're giving away $500 in $BLOOM. How to enter: Join Bloom City Create an Agent Wallet Post a screenshot of your city profile Tell us which agent you would deploy first 🏆 10 winners will be selected. ⏳ Giveaway ends in 7 days. This isn't just a giveaway. We're looking for the first citizens of an autonomous economy. The users who will help shape the future of autonomous agents, agent-owned capital, and onchain finance. Join Bloom City below 👇 bloomterminal.io/city $BLOOM

v4 HOOKS: THE SCAM YOUR SECURITY SCANNER CAN'T SEE Every "token safety" check you've been trusting is looking in the wrong place. WHAT IS A HOOK? Uniswap v4 introduced "hooks." A hook is a separate contract attached to a liquidity pool that runs custom code at the exact moments you interact with it. Before/after every swap, every add, every remove. In plain terms: a hook is code that executes every time you buy or sell. That's powerful for real builders. It's a gift for scammers. WHY THEY'RE DANGEROUS For years, scams lived inside the token contract: high sell tax, blacklists, "can't sell" honeypots. Scanners learned to catch those. So the scam moved. In v4, the malicious logic now lives in the HOOK, not the token. A hostile hook can: - charge a tax on every swap that the token contract never declares - let you buy, then make your sell revert — a honeypot at the pool layer - skim a slice of every trade to the deployer - sit clean at launch, then flip after liquidity builds (upgradeable logic) The token itself reads perfectly clean. 0% tax. Sellable. Owner renounced. All true — because the trap isn't in the token. It's in the hook bolted to the pool. WHY MOST TOOLS MISS IT The popular "is this token safe?" scanners analyze the TOKEN bytecode. They don't resolve and inspect the HOOK contract sitting behind the pool. So they hand you a green checkmark on a pool that's quietly taxing or trapping you. This isn't theoretical. Malicious and broken hooks have already drained real money (the Cork Protocol hook bug alone cost ~$11M), and v4 lets anyone deploy any pool with any hook — no gatekeeper. On the BASE chain, where new pools launch by the minute, that's exactly the gap scammers are farming: deploy a clean-looking token, hide the mechanism in the hook, let the standard scanners wave it through. WHERE @palsai_bot COMES IN PALS resolves the actual v4 hook behind a pool and inspects what it can do — not just the token. We check the hook's permissions and behavior (can it tax you, block your sell, or change the rules after launch?) and fold that into Contract Safety, so a pool that looks clean on the surface but hides risk in the hook gets flagged, not greenlit. It's one of the very few tools — and one of the first built for retail Base launches — that actually looks at the hook layer instead of stopping at the token. Don't trust a checkmark that never read the hook.

@DjGriffith Definitely worth checking out, highlights many good early stage projects and sifts out the larps.

PALS does all the heavy lifting for on-chain research on BASE. If you are a BASE degen, there is no better tool than PALS. I am building with all my on-chain expertise.

You do not need to chase which coins are pumping and spend time figuring out why. @pals_bot makes everything easier for you. Receive quick reports on all the onchain gems that are sending, with the reasons behind them. Start: t.me/palsai_bot

@AltcoinSensei It’s only dumped because of all the rotating jeets. That’s how SOL and Base operate. Fomo and hype followed by massive dump from early buyers. Same playbook nearly every time.

So much hate on $GITLAWB lol. You know it ran from like 100K to 42M in like 30-40 days right? It was literally the ONLY reason the trenches got alive again. Funny how everyone comes out after it dumps, but when it was up only for 40 days, NO ONE talked. It shows people like to GRAVE dance, but never are there when money is to be earned. I think that @kevincodex made some mistakes. The test coin, but also the playground was a mistake IMO. All the volume went to shitters that RUGGED. That volume was destined for $GITLAWB if the playground wasn’t launched. BUT you can’t say that @kevincodex did not do ENOUGH to earn trust. I will wait for some hours to let the chart chill, and will look to DCA some dips again. I think the network and the utility is too big to let it fail.

@crypthick38 @Aisi_Space Genuine team building a great ecosystem with their web3 banking project. Most web3 banking protocols are bulls#it, AISI are the real deal!

@DjGriffith @pals_bot I hope so, the sheer number of daily scam tokens is outrageous and nothing is being done about it. We need more people like you to expose these scummers and their scam tokens and more white hat hackers to fight back.

The more I build @pals_bot the more I realise 99.9% of AI crypto projects are garbage. Vibe coding removed the barrier between idea and product. Teams just need an idea and a vision. However they don’t because they think nothing but scamming. I will fix this.

@Hyre_agent @Cloudflare Dang!

High traffic volume across HYRE over the past 30 days. Based on @Cloudflare: → 20.83K total unique visitors → 1.41K max unique visitors in a day → 574 min unique visitors in a day But here's the difference this isn't a marketing site. This is an agent-facing API. Organic, consistent traffic from agents and builders actually using the product. Every single day. For us, this is the clearest signal that agentic commerce is real not announcements, not hype, just usage. Traction > Narrative.

@crypthick38 @Aisi_Space Can’t wait!

Nothing beats good charts backed by the project's fundamentals. $ETHY was screaming higher for months because it dominates the Virtual agentic economy and makes insane revenue, which is used for buybacks. Next should be ATH. NFA, just a personal opinion.

@greedyape1 @QuintenFrancois Ayyyyeeee!

@QuintenFrancois This is your last chance on $AISI dexscreener.com/solana/B51YPnT…

Every bull market you tell yourself you should’ve bought during the bear market Here is your chance

@AltcoinSensei @fomo Nice one Sensei!

It’s time for a @fomo account. Who wants it? There everyone can COPY my trades and ENTER at the EXACT same time as I do? 100 likes + 100 comments and I will create it this week.

@DjGriffith Definitely some interesting AI projects that are seriously undervalued.

Base onchain is where the next generation of millionaires will be made.

@CoinMarketCap Check out $AISI Latest update x.com/aisi_space/sta…

@AltcoinSensei Yes!

have accumulated some more AI tokens on Base, who wants to see them? 👀

@cortensor More need to know about this.

🧪 Testnet Phase #4 – Preview Recap (Kicks Off This Weekend) Phase #4 docs are now live: docs.cortensor.network/community-and-… Phase #4 is less about adding isolated features and more about tightening the full pipeline under realistic conditions - data → quality → routing, reliability under load, and Mainnet Lite readiness. 🔹 Kickoff note (this weekend) - We expect to kick off this weekend after a one-time indexer reset. - Most major research/design items are now done, so Phase #4 shifts from planning → execution. 🔹 Infra readiness (new RPC / server path is ready) - L2 testnet/mainnet RPC path and L3 testnet/pre-mainnet RPC path are now fully set up on new servers. - During Phase #4 we’ll test against this path more directly and then move toward switching over to the newer server setup. - L2 mainnet RPC is ready as well - Phase #4 will begin bringing up Mainnet Lite pieces on top (dashboard, indexer, oracle-related path). 🔹 Portal readiness (key path proven → gateway→router pool is next) - API key issuance + consumption experiments are working: issue key → consume key → verify via Unkey → record usage/state via Supabase. - Portal focus now shifts to the main product question: the Portal/API Gateway → managed router pool execution path (simple, stable, clean). 🔹 1) E2E Scope Lock (Phase #3 → Phase #4) - Finalize the full end-to-end test plan + order + pass/fail metrics (latency/throughput, recovery, drift, data integrity/offchain correctness) 🔹 2) Deeper Stress Testing (Data → Quality Path) - Longer-duration, higher-volume tests that hit real failure modes (churn, partial outages, RPC degradation, queue spikes) 🔹 3) Privacy + Offchain Storage Stress Tests (Optional / Heavier) - Heavier testing where enabled: encryption paths + offchain correctness + edge cases (timeouts, stale keys, partial writes) 🔹 4) SLA / Quality Signals – Deeper Validation (#3 Signals) - Validate SLA signals under churn/load (drift detection, reliability weighting vs uptime, disagreement/arbitration behavior) 🔹 5) Portal V1 (Design → Early Implementation) + Product Boundary - Portal becomes a real product layer: client → Portal backend → router pool → sessions - Scope: API keys, usage visibility, managed router pools, auth/rate limits, billing hooks + metering 🔹 6) PyClaw (Early Dev Release Track) - Move from design into early dev release: landing page + docs + initial runtime scaffolding aligned to router/session primitives 🔹 7) Mainnet Lite Infra Planning (Execution Readiness) - Servers/RPC/monitoring/ops + validate runbooks under realistic failure scenarios #Cortensor #Testnet #Phase4 #DevUpdate #Portal #PyClaw #InferenceQuality #AIInfra #DePIN #L3