@lxvesickpisces Is dat niet zo’n naam die ouders geven aan hun kind omdat ze denken dat dat kind ooit misschien transgender wil zijn en Anne een redelijk uniseks naam is?
@likewise7581561@choehau_ara We thankfully had a choice between X11 and Wayland, but now X11 devs have been bullied off of major distros before "Wayland" is even ready. And its about to get removed completely soon
Wayland also doesn't allow standard programs to change screw resolution. A load of rubbish
No that is not how it works. If someone commits a deed of kufr, and he himself thinks he is still a muslim, then you cannot call him a kafir. There are a few conditions that have to be reached first.
1. Person must be of sound mind
2. Person must not be ignorant
3. Person must know and admit that he freely committed kufr
4. Person doing this interview must be knowledgable
Reaching these condition and committing takfir over the internet is impossible. I may have forgotten a condition. Wa Allahu a3lam.
@arisSyan84919@HothaAli@IraqiWithAGun Generally yes but he committed blatant kufr there
Like if you saw someone say he’s a Muslim but Prays to a human you must say he’s a kafir , what he did wasn’t even a gray area
As a Muslim, your prayers are not accepted if you turn your back on Saudi Arabia, and if you are able to visit it but choose not to, then you will go to hell.
@Redzoreck@AllahGreatQuran Its not about affordability. Its impossible to give equal love to 4. Its impossible for a woman not to feel jealousy. Its permissible but with great responsibility.
@_ProjectZeus@dyyeen1@llostinspace20@MuzlimsPostingW In times of constant war and disease, every widow would love to become a second wife. This was solving major societal problems. Widows need love, protection, a house and kids too.
@AKuzfgujgtzz@AllahGreatQuran ur saying some dangerous stuff bordering on kufr bro. learn the deen before you go against what Allah says like in this case.
@AllahGreatQuran Evil Eye only hits the one who believes in it. You guys give people the same power as allah. Keep live in fear and superstitions. You made the Religion into a circus. Sahaba conquered the map and Muslims of today fear eyes and jinns. Islam is a way of living, not abrakadabra.
@ElderScrolls8@benonwine Unsigned apps? Unsigned by whom? By google? I also don't trust them. I'd rather download my apps directly from developers who show their source code.
Banking apps can now see which apps you have installed and where they came from. Let that sink in.
Install something they don’t approve of? Suddenly it’s “sorry, you can’t access your money until you fix your wrongthinking.” No court order. No warning. Just a locked screen and zero options.
This isn’t about security anymore, it’s about control, compliance, and surveillance baked into everyday tech. Convenience was the bait. Dependence is the trap.
We’re not entering a golden age of technology.
We’re sliding into the digital dark ages.
@ProtonMail LOL the thinking process has me giggling. But as a proton user, I have no idea how it’s any less convenient than Gmail. It’s email…just safer.
Christians need to realize that circumcision during biblical times was vastly different from today. The Bible also states that circumcision is no longer necessary, as Christ fulfilled the law. There is no reason for Christian families to have their sons circumcised.
The 'Ulamaa have said, if you are you must also acquire a marriage license in the country where you're living. If you are unable to do this, than marriage is off the table. Because if the government questions (on paper or in person) you and ask you, are you married to so and so, and you reply with no, then you are not married.
There is no loophole here. This is the Shari'ah.
@geddz65@rinusredpill dan moet je geen fvd stemmen op moment, ik zou dolgraag fvd stemmen, maar ze schieten zichzelf echt in de voet door niet voluit israel te steunen
Waarom hangt er een Israëlische vlag in het partijkantoor van een 'Nederlandse' partij? Bij FVD kennen we maar één loyaliteit: Nederland. Wij laten ons buitenlandbeleid niet dicteren door vreemde mogendheden of lobby’s. Kies voor echte soevereiniteit, niet voor verraders. 🚫🇮🇱
I already said it's a choice, that's literally my point. Parents make medical decisions for their children all the time before the child can consent, from vaccines to tonsillectomies. You can disagree with the decision, but calling the health benefits "false" doesn't make them false. The AAP, the WHO, and the CDC have all acknowledged them. You don't get to dismiss peer-reviewed evidence because it doesn't fit your position.
As for the New Testament argument, Paul said circumcision is neither here nor there for salvation. He didn't say it was harmful or wrong. "Not needed for salvation" and "shouldn't be done" are two very different statements, and conflating them is either dishonest or sloppy reading.
And yes, I'm aware of the argument about biblical circumcision removing less tissue. That's a debated claim among scholars, not an established fact. But even if we accept it, it doesn't change the core point: the practice itself was instituted, and nowhere in scripture is it condemned. Only its role as a requirement for gentile believers was set aside.
We're clearly going in circles. You keep arguing against points I'm not making while ignoring the ones I am. I think we've both said our piece.
@compiledpixel@LSeasonist@ZoomerRestore Why would you want to be circumcised when the New Testament says it’s not needed at all? And you do know that the OP is talking about how biblical circumcision removed far less skin than they do now, right?