MeWhenSkull
1.3K posts


@MyNguyen6688 @WhiteHouse @NASA Alright whats misunderstood then? Because earlier you were yappin about a "reflected along a 3-6-9 degree curve" LMFAO
English

@oh_womp @WhiteHouse @NASA The theory sounds pretty good, but the most basic and simple thing is misunderstood. Do it your way and thrive!
English

@oh_womp @WhiteHouse @NASA 😀 with 80-400mm lens and witj 4,067 miles from the lunar surface? Let's you try with your imagination and see what the result!
English

@MyNguyen6688 @WhiteHouse @NASA Using just pixel measurements and obvious estimations, the space not accompanied by the Earth is around 900 pixels, with the total height being 1800 pixels, that matches our 50%
English

LIVE: Watch with us as the Artemis II astronauts make their closest approach to the Moon, traveling farther from Earth than ever before. twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

@neoviky Cry about it? I'm not even wrong lol. Also yeah it can easily be created but it doesn't look nearly as realistic lol. Of course post processing can be done since these are quite literally the original photos
English

If you say that somthin looks shtt repeatedly 1000 times it does start to look like that.
If you say somethng looks amazing and repeat that 1000 times, people start to think it is amazing, even if it's shtt. I was not trying to make a better image. I was just trying to understand how is it that these images can be easily created using free versions of AI?
MeWhenSkull@oh_womp
@neoviky @NASA The left one looks like shit icl, and you compressed the original like 100x lol
English

@swingstatemind @WhiteHouse @NASA Because i've seen it answer for like a picture is Australia yet it was Africa from these missions lol. Its observing use cases for recent events, not that hard to judge something if other people use it
English

@SunCeylonHQ @NASA Its bot accounts spreading a fake AI image, pretty obvious when you look closer

English

@Average2028 @NASA "no stars" me when I don't understand how exposure works
English

@MelvineTheGreat @NASA Because it was taken at a different focal length
English

@Charles_Muxia @naomirwolf This is ironic because you don't even understand focal lengths
English

I still have the same question or the same areas of curiosity. If a quarter of what we can see of earth from the space capsule is in sunlight and the rest of what we see is in darkness and the moon that we see is in darkness, can someone please map out or show in a chart where the sun is in relation to both, and what is the angle of illumination that is causing this illumination and darkness? Isn’t anyone else curious to see how this all relates?
Abid@Zyrax2005
@WhiteHouse @NASA @grok can you tell me which camera use for take this photo?
English

@swingstatemind @WhiteHouse @NASA "i did, *it* said the image"
So you didnt LMFAO
If you want to do some critical thinking, use your brain, Grok isn't the smartest AI model whatsoever lol, it is difficult with images, why do you think every new photo thats come out from this it gets completely wrong?
English

@qboomer17 @WhiteHouse @NASA Different photo but basically just zoomed out as the last one
They are lit at the same angles, the moon is also darker because it has a much lower albedo and the surface is rough.

English

@WhiteHouse @NASA lol weird that a sun 93 million miles away can’t equally light the earth and moon at the same angles…. 🤡
English
















