Chad Moran: "Is this not a double standard? The CT was on FSD 13, this test on FSD 14. Every "

Post

Chad Moran@ChadMoran·18h

Is this not a double standard? The CT was on FSD 13, this test on FSD 14. Every time I post a critical issue FSD has done 90% of the comments are yelling at me about how I'm "not on the latest version". Yet we're using a version 6 months newer to prove an older one DIDN'T do something?

JC Christopher@JCChristopher

I went to the exact same location of the Cybertruck accident shown in the Fox News video. This is the US-69/59 Eastex Freeway northbound HOV lane at the Y-split near the Eastex Park & Ride exit (approaching from downtown Houston toward Humble). In the Fox News video, the vehicle failed to follow the right curve, going straight into the barrier. Well, I tested it twice today with Tesla FSD engaged the entire time with zero human intervention. And unless you think I am a hologram speaking to you from another dimension now, it worked out really well. Here is the video of me taking the exact same curve twice, with Tesla FSD v14.2.2.5.

English

139

19.4K

Joseph Wilson@ThisisJoeWilson·10h

@ChadMoran The issue is you think that FSD Supervised is a driver replacement system. It is not. It’s a driver enhancement system. We all know it makes mistakes. That’s what we agreed to when we bought it and activated it. Your life is more protected with it on than if it was off.

English

498

CajunCybertruck@CajunCybertruck·4h

The older version of FSD didn’t do it. The driver did. We still don’t know why or how the disengagement occurred. But what we do know is that the video starts 4 seconds before the crash, which is exactly when she took over/disengaged. In that time, the vehicle isn’t slowing. So it does not appear that she was braking at the start of the video. She must have had her foot on the accelerator at that time—and likely had it there before the disengagement too—otherwise the truck would have been slowing drastically.

English

288

Tom Ford Capital@MoneyMacGyver·2h

What does any of it matter? Elon himself has already commented that the driver disengaged FSD 4 seconds before impact. People created these videos before the truth of the incident came out. It not always as nefarious as you think, a lot of FSD enthusiasts get excited when they find potential bugs because they want it to be the best product possible.

English

103

JCurling@CurlingCrypto·9h

@ChadMoran Some folks went thru it on versions older than what she was on and it did fine. The driver was pressing the accelerator. Knowingly or not...

English

262

The Count of Monte Crypto@Il_Pastore_TCMC·14h

@ChadMoran Was it on FSD 13? The original court filing said Autopilot which on a Cybertruck would be TACC with no Autosteer. It was later amended to say FSD, but I have not seen any public evidence yet that it had an FSD subscription, or that FSD was engaged.

English

457

Seattle_RT 🇺🇸@Seattle_RT·4h

@ChadMoran She was driving. She took over and was driving during the ENTIRE video that’s been shared. There is literally zero FSD in use during that video.

English

118

Alex@AC693420·6h

@ChadMoran I agree - even if it were the same version - the test is flawed unless done 100X and even then.... Anything could happen to make the situation different - lighting, a shadow, wheel slippage...etc . I dont know how someone can think this proves anything with certainty

English

184

EspElement@EspElement·6h

@ChadMoran Oh crap, that CT was on 13? If so, then they should have been WAY more alert. 13 is not anything close to 14.

English

157